{"id":88160,"date":"2016-02-17T19:53:49","date_gmt":"2016-02-18T00:53:49","guid":{"rendered":"\/news\/?p=88160"},"modified":"2016-02-17T19:53:49","modified_gmt":"2016-02-18T00:53:49","slug":"texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/","title":{"rendered":"Texas abortion law deserves scrutiny because men wrote it, argues radical brief"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

Among the many dubious arguments<\/a> pro-aborts are making to the Supreme Court as it considers Texas abortion regulations<\/a>, this one<\/a> may be the most preposterous: a brief by a group of radical academics arguing that, as the Washington Post\u2019s Robert Barnes describes it, we should \u201cbe skeptical of laws protecting women that are written by men.\u201d<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

The brief urges the justices to examine the intent of Texas legislators who say they approved new restrictions on abortion providers as health safeguards for the women undergoing the procedure.<\/p>\n

“Any new law that claims to protect women’s health and safety should be scrutinized carefully to assess whether its ostensibly protective function actually serves to deny liberty and equal citizenship to women,” said the brief filed by 16 historians, 13 of whom are women.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Funny, last I checked the entire point of gender equality was that a person\u2019s sex shouldn\u2019t<\/em> influence our assessment of his or her character, ideas, or abilities. Maybe pro-abortion sexism<\/a> is a bigger<\/a> problem<\/a> than the press has led us to believe.<\/p>\n

With their suspiciously-discriminatory premise established, it should come as no surprise that their evidence is bunk:<\/p>\n

\n

The nation’s past is littered with such statutes, say the historians who filed the friend-of-the-court brief, and the motives were suspect.<\/p>\n

Some protected women from “the embarrassment of hearing filthy evidence” as members of a jury, a sheltering instinct that resulted in female defendants being judged by panels composed only of men.<\/p>\n

Some shielded women from having to work nights as pharmacists in hospitals – but not as low-wage custodians.<\/p>\n

Some barred women from working as bartenders – jobs coveted by men – but not as cocktail waitresses.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Yes, these are ridiculous laws that are thankfully gone, but as a more self-respecting opposition would not bother making us point out in the first place, none of them have anything to do with abortion or medical regulations<\/em>. The legal logic is what\u2014because women were targeted by sexist laws in the past, completely unrelated<\/em> laws that happen to involve women are to be presumed illegitimate? If law schools are actually teaching such utter nonsense these days, we\u2019re in bigger trouble than I thought.<\/p>\n

In any event, intent is too subjective a criterion to base a law\u2019s constitutionality on. What really matters is a law\u2019s actual effect, judged against a simple, straightforward<\/a> examination of (1) whether anything in the Constitution specifically says something is the feds\u2019 business or a state\u2019s, (2) specifically guarantees a right to the activity in question and (3) specifically forbids a state from regulating it, and (4) whether the state constitution expressly forbids the regulation. Then again, if we ran things by how the law actually works, pro-aborts would be out of a job.<\/p>\n

Roberts\u2019s article even notes that this is what\u2019s known as a \u201cBrandeis brief,\u201d characterized for being \u201clong on history and science and short on detailed legal citations.\u201d Naturally, activist Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a big fan of Brandeis briefs for \u201ceducat[ing] the judiciary about the real world in which the laws under inspection operated.\u201d<\/p>\n

As I explained<\/a> recently, this is precisely backward because we already have two elected branches of government to consider the \u201creal world impact\u201d of policy. Unelected judges are supposed to balance politicians\u2019 emotional decisions and value judgments with completely detached technical assessment of how the law applies.<\/p>\n

Not that that would matter to Ginsburg, who has explicitly said<\/a> that Roe v. Wade<\/em> doesn\u2019t deserve upholding (despite her repeated votes to do just that), and that the Supreme Court should base their abortion decisions on whatever would best promote the culture\u2019s long-term acceptance of abortion.<\/p>\n

Finally, while intent does not change the merits of a case, it can shed light on the true seriousness of an interested party\u2014like, for instance, Texas plaintiff Whole Woman\u2019s Health having racked up quite the rap sheet<\/a> for rusty instruments \u201clikely to cause infection,\u201d expired drugs, mishandled documentation, and vital medical equipment either maintained improperly or missing entirely.<\/p>\n

The intent of men who died generations ago pales in comparison to the intent of officials trying to avoid consequences for their misdeeds today, no matter how much legal trickery pro-aborts engage in to paint their protection of a crooked industry as something noble.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Among the many dubious arguments pro-aborts are making to the Supreme Court as it considers Texas abortion regulations, this one may be the most preposterous: a brief by a group of radical academics arguing that, as the Washington Post\u2019s Robert Barnes describes it, we should \u201cbe skeptical of laws protecting women that are written by […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":54,"featured_media":51551,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[15],"tags":[3795,6854,7566,259,1118,158,3913,197,82],"yoast_head":"\nTexas abortion law deserves scrutiny because men wrote it, argues radical brief<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A brief has been filed on behalf of an abortion facility suggesting that laws passed by men should be scrutinized to see if they discriminate against women.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Texas abortion law deserves scrutiny because men wrote it, argues radical brief\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A brief has been filed on behalf of an abortion facility suggesting that laws passed by men should be scrutinized to see if they discriminate against women.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-02-18T00:53:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/supreme-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"222\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Calvin Freiburger\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Calvin Freiburger\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Calvin Freiburger\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6eb2bf94c8064b71953ba137bf413c4d\"},\"headline\":\"Texas abortion law deserves scrutiny because men wrote it, argues radical brief\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-02-18T00:53:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-18T00:53:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/\"},\"wordCount\":727,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"abortion clinic regulations\",\"amicus brief\",\"Brandeis brief\",\"judicial activism\",\"pro-life laws\",\"sexism\",\"state laws\",\"Supreme Court\",\"Texas\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Analysis\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/\",\"name\":\"Texas abortion law deserves scrutiny because men wrote it, argues radical brief\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-02-18T00:53:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-18T00:53:49+00:00\",\"description\":\"A brief has been filed on behalf of an abortion facility suggesting that laws passed by men should be scrutinized to see if they discriminate against women.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Texas abortion law deserves scrutiny because men wrote it, argues radical brief\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6eb2bf94c8064b71953ba137bf413c4d\",\"name\":\"Calvin Freiburger\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e27533b6967b0c47cce543ba67e2a7a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e27533b6967b0c47cce543ba67e2a7a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Calvin Freiburger\"},\"description\":\"Calvin Freiburger is a Wisconsin-based conservative writer and 2011 Hillsdale College graduate, dedicated to the principles of the American Founding\u2014individual liberty, limited government, public virtue, free markets, and strong defense\u2014though he believes no issue is more important than defending the unalienable rights of society\u2019s most vulnerable members. Calvin is an editor and administrator for TheFederalistPapers.org, and his work has appeared on NewsRealBlog.com, PatriotUpdate.com, LifeNews.com, LifeSiteNews.com, RightWisconsin.com, AmericanThinker.com, Stream.org, AmericanClarion.org, and more. Please check out his official website, ConservativeStandards.com. Follow @CalFreiburger\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/calvin-freiburger\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Texas abortion law deserves scrutiny because men wrote it, argues radical brief","description":"A brief has been filed on behalf of an abortion facility suggesting that laws passed by men should be scrutinized to see if they discriminate against women.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Texas abortion law deserves scrutiny because men wrote it, argues radical brief","og_description":"A brief has been filed on behalf of an abortion facility suggesting that laws passed by men should be scrutinized to see if they discriminate against women.","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2016-02-18T00:53:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":640,"height":222,"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/supreme-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Calvin Freiburger","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@liveaction","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Calvin Freiburger","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/"},"author":{"name":"Calvin Freiburger","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6eb2bf94c8064b71953ba137bf413c4d"},"headline":"Texas abortion law deserves scrutiny because men wrote it, argues radical brief","datePublished":"2016-02-18T00:53:49+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-18T00:53:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/"},"wordCount":727,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"keywords":["abortion clinic regulations","amicus brief","Brandeis brief","judicial activism","pro-life laws","sexism","state laws","Supreme Court","Texas"],"articleSection":["Analysis"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/","name":"Texas abortion law deserves scrutiny because men wrote it, argues radical brief","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-02-18T00:53:49+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-18T00:53:49+00:00","description":"A brief has been filed on behalf of an abortion facility suggesting that laws passed by men should be scrutinized to see if they discriminate against women.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/texas-abortion-law-deserves-scrutiny-men-wrote-argues-radical-brief\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Texas abortion law deserves scrutiny because men wrote it, argues radical brief"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6eb2bf94c8064b71953ba137bf413c4d","name":"Calvin Freiburger","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e27533b6967b0c47cce543ba67e2a7a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e27533b6967b0c47cce543ba67e2a7a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Calvin Freiburger"},"description":"Calvin Freiburger is a Wisconsin-based conservative writer and 2011 Hillsdale College graduate, dedicated to the principles of the American Founding\u2014individual liberty, limited government, public virtue, free markets, and strong defense\u2014though he believes no issue is more important than defending the unalienable rights of society\u2019s most vulnerable members. Calvin is an editor and administrator for TheFederalistPapers.org, and his work has appeared on NewsRealBlog.com, PatriotUpdate.com, LifeNews.com, LifeSiteNews.com, RightWisconsin.com, AmericanThinker.com, Stream.org, AmericanClarion.org, and more. Please check out his official website, ConservativeStandards.com. Follow @CalFreiburger","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/calvin-freiburger\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88160"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/54"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=88160"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88160\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":88170,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88160\/revisions\/88170"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/51551"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=88160"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=88160"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=88160"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}