{"id":87176,"date":"2016-06-08T15:36:48","date_gmt":"2016-06-08T19:36:48","guid":{"rendered":"\/news\/?p=87176"},"modified":"2016-09-01T15:23:01","modified_gmt":"2016-09-01T19:23:01","slug":"abortionist-unsettling-babies-born-alive","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/abortionist-unsettling-babies-born-alive\/","title":{"rendered":"Abortion workers admit infants who survive abortions are killed outside the womb"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

In the\u00a0Stanford Law & Policy Review<\/em>, two\u00a0abortionists made a startling statement. Apparently, when these abortionists committed\u00a0late-term abortions in the 1990s, they ensured that the child died in the womb prior to delivery\u00a0in order to\u00a0avoid delivering born-alive infants. Seeing an abortion survivor, they admitted, was “unsettling.”<\/p>\n

\n

We use urea to be certain that we effect fetal death. It is unsettling to all personnel to deliver these fetuses when they are not stillborn.(1)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

To these abortionists, having a living, kicking, fully born infant alive in an abortion facility\u00a0is “unsettling.” I would think so. Imagine how “unsettling” it must be for the mother.\u00a0To view an unintended live birth as merely “unsettling,” however, would seem to be quite an understatement.<\/p>\n

One wonders how many times this scenario has actually happened. We know from various statements made by abortionists during Live Action’s undercover InHuman<\/a> investigation that the goal of a late-term abortion is to ensure that the child does not survive to be born alive. However, there are\u00a0no guarantees:<\/p>\n