{"id":78987,"date":"2015-11-03T10:21:15","date_gmt":"2015-11-03T15:21:15","guid":{"rendered":"\/news\/?p=78987"},"modified":"2015-11-02T20:52:04","modified_gmt":"2015-11-03T01:52:04","slug":"family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;Family planning&#8217; in China is social control, masquerading as population control"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><p>Xinhua News Agency reported on October 29 that China will move to a two-child policy for all couples. \u00a0This move replaces the 2014 change that enabled couples to have a second child if one member of the couple is an only child.<\/p>\n<p>Newspaper headlines heralded the change as the \u201cend\u201d or \u201cabandonment\u201d of the One Child Policy.\u00a0Not so. Coercion is the core of the policy. Instituting a two-child policy will not end forced abortion or forced sterilization. As blind activist Chen Guangcheng succinctly tweeted:<\/p>\n<div class=\"video-container\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">This is nothing to be happy about. First the <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/CCP?src=hash\">#CCP<\/a> would kill any baby after one. Now they will kill any baby after two.<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/ChinaOneChildPolicy?src=hash\">#ChinaOneChildPolicy<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Chen Guangcheng \u9648\u5149\u8bda (@iguangcheng) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/iguangcheng\/status\/659769190547660800\">October 29, 2015<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/div>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>The Chinese Communist Party will never end coercive population control, because coercive population is keeping it in place.<\/p>\n<p>All the reasons the Chinese government has given for this adjustment are demographic.\u00a0 Even if China were to completely abandon all population control now, however, demographers worry that it might be\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scmp.com\/news\/china\/article\/1224885\/critic-one-child-policy-cold\">too little<\/a><strong>, <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/yaleglobal.yale.edu\/content\/easing-one-child-policy-may-be-too-late\">too late<\/a>\u00a0to avert the demographic disaster it has caused.\u00a0 As one researcher stated, \u201cEven if the family-planning policy were terminated today, it would be too late to solve our rapidly aging population, the drastic shrinkage of the labour force and the gaping hole in social-security funds that the country has already begun struggling with.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In addition, the most recent modification of the One Child Policy has failed to produce the expected number of births, as couples are <a href=\"http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/women\/womens-life\/11963915\/China-one-child-policy-Its-changed-but-dont-celebrate-too-soon.html\">self-limiting<\/a> the size of their families.\u00a0Continuing any form of coercive population control \u2013 including a two-child policy &#8211; makes no demographic sense.\u00a0 China\u2019s population problem is not that it has too many people, but too few young people, too few workers and too few women.<\/p>\n<p>Why, then, does the Chinese Communist Party keep the One Child Policy?<\/p>\n<p>In my opinion, the Chinese Communist Party will never abolish coercive population control.\u00a0 The government is exploiting so-called \u201cfamily planning\u201d as\u00a0social control, masquerading as population control.<\/p>\n<p>The One Child Policy was formally instituted on September 25, 1980, in response to the population explosion under the Mao era, when the average fertility was 5.9 children per woman. The Policy began as a means to control the population, however brutal and misguided. The terror of forced abortion and involuntary sterilization was a by-product of the Policy. The fertility rate has fallen to approximately 1.6 children per woman, far below the replacement level of 2.1. These birth rates are dangerously low.<\/p>\n<p>Now that keeping the Policy makes no demographic sense, I believe that\u00a0terror is the purpose of the Policy.<\/p>\n<p>Forced abortion <a href=\"http:\/\/news.sky.com\/story\/1150016\/china-couple-speak-of-forced-abortion\">continues<\/a> in China, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.asianews.it\/news-en\/Xinjiang-authorities-try-to-force-six-women-to-abort-for-violating-one-child-policy-29925.html\">terrifying<\/a> both <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rfa.org\/english\/news\/uyghur\/abortion-12302013050902.html\">women and men<\/a>. Some of these forced abortions have been so violent that the women themselves have <a href=\"http:\/\/news.sky.com\/story\/1150016\/china-couple-speak-of-forced-abortion\">died<\/a> along with their full term babies. \u00a0 Forced abortion is so terrifying that victims at times <a href=\"http:\/\/www.christianpost.com\/news\/forced-abortion-at-7-months-the-horror-of-chinas-one-child-policy-sparks-further-outrage-101764\/\">succumb to mental illness<\/a> and China has the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.worldmag.com\/2014\/01\/chinese_couple_seeks_damages_for_forced_abortion\">highest female suicide rate<\/a> in the world.<\/p>\n<p>Gong Quifeng is just one woman affected by China\u2019s brutal family policies.\u00a0 Seven months pregnant with her second son, Quifeng was removed from her home and forced to undergo an abortion procedure in 2011. Her crime?\u00a0 This was her second pregnancy, in violation of the One Child Policy. Two years later, the induced abortion was still taking its emotional toll and Quifeng was diagnosed with schizophrenia. The story of Quifeng is tragic but hardly unique.<\/p>\n<p>Men also are terrorized. Some have been <a href=\"http:\/\/www.womensrightswithoutfrontiers.org\/blog\/?p=147\">killed or maimed for life<\/a>. Others have lost control and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/news\/article-2376771\/Chinese-father-kills-1-child-policy-officials-registering-4th-child.html\">murdered family planning officials<\/a>. Some men have <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lifesitenews.com\/news\/chinese-father-of-four-commits-suicide-over-one-child-policy-fines-so-his-c\">resorted to suicide<\/a> in protest over the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.globaltimes.cn\/content\/830847.shtml\">excessive fines<\/a> imposed by the government.<\/p>\n<p>The spirit of the Cultural Revolution lives on in the family planning police, who function as\u00a0\u201cwomb police\u201d\u00a0and have been able to steal, intimidate, torture and kill with relative impunity.\u00a0 The result is a strengthened police state with an intimidated populace unable to offer effective resistance.<\/p>\n<p>The Chinese Communist Party is a brutal, totalitarian regime, responsible for multifarious human rights abuses.\u00a0 Coercive population control, however, is unique in that it touches each individual and community.\u00a0CCP maintains its grip on power by extending its arm from Beijing and inserting its hand into every womb to declare life or death over the beating heart inside.<\/p>\n<p><em>Author\u2019s Note:\u00a0 This is the first in a four-part series of opinion pieces on the reasons that the Chinese Communist Party will never abandon coercive population control.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Editor&#8217;s Note: Find more information at\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.womensrightswithoutfrontiers.org\">Women&#8217;s Rights Without Frontiers<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Xinhua News Agency reported on October 29 that China will move to a two-child policy for all couples. \u00a0This move replaces the 2014 change that enabled couples to have a second child if one member of the couple is an only child. Newspaper headlines heralded the change as the \u201cend\u201d or \u201cabandonment\u201d of the One [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":383,"featured_media":71995,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[3],"tags":[1241,422,5959,5958,5960,1578,531,396,5957],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>&#039;Family planning&#039; in China is social control, masquerading as population control<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"&#039;Family planning&#039; in China is social control, masquerading as population control\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Xinhua News Agency reported on October 29 that China will move to a two-child policy for all couples. \u00a0This move replaces the 2014 change that enabled couples to have a second child if one member of the couple is an only child. Newspaper headlines heralded the change as the \u201cend\u201d or \u201cabandonment\u201d of the One [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-11-03T15:21:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-11-03T01:52:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/China.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"672\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"372\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Reggie Littlejohn\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Reggie Littlejohn\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Reggie Littlejohn\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/1b5106e04442619847bfac7374a2bcb0\"},\"headline\":\"&#8216;Family planning&#8217; in China is social control, masquerading as population control\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-11-03T15:21:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-03T01:52:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/\"},\"wordCount\":719,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"chen guangcheng\",\"china\",\"Chinese Communist Party\",\"Communist Party\",\"Gong Quifeng\",\"mental illness\",\"One-Child Policy\",\"suicide\",\"two child policy\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Opinion\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/\",\"name\":\"'Family planning' in China is social control, masquerading as population control\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-11-03T15:21:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-03T01:52:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"&#8216;Family planning&#8217; in China is social control, masquerading as population control\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/1b5106e04442619847bfac7374a2bcb0\",\"name\":\"Reggie Littlejohn\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6101e43744970445b8a70f34f259f82b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6101e43744970445b8a70f34f259f82b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Reggie Littlejohn\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.womensrightswithoutfrontiers.org\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/reggie-littlejohn\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"'Family planning' in China is social control, masquerading as population control","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"'Family planning' in China is social control, masquerading as population control","og_description":"Xinhua News Agency reported on October 29 that China will move to a two-child policy for all couples. \u00a0This move replaces the 2014 change that enabled couples to have a second child if one member of the couple is an only child. Newspaper headlines heralded the change as the \u201cend\u201d or \u201cabandonment\u201d of the One [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2015-11-03T15:21:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-11-03T01:52:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":672,"height":372,"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/China.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Reggie Littlejohn","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@liveaction","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Reggie Littlejohn","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/"},"author":{"name":"Reggie Littlejohn","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/1b5106e04442619847bfac7374a2bcb0"},"headline":"&#8216;Family planning&#8217; in China is social control, masquerading as population control","datePublished":"2015-11-03T15:21:15+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-03T01:52:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/"},"wordCount":719,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"keywords":["chen guangcheng","china","Chinese Communist Party","Communist Party","Gong Quifeng","mental illness","One-Child Policy","suicide","two child policy"],"articleSection":["Opinion"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/","name":"'Family planning' in China is social control, masquerading as population control","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-11-03T15:21:15+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-03T01:52:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/family-planning-in-china-is-social-control-masquerading-as-population-control\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"&#8216;Family planning&#8217; in China is social control, masquerading as population control"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/1b5106e04442619847bfac7374a2bcb0","name":"Reggie Littlejohn","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6101e43744970445b8a70f34f259f82b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6101e43744970445b8a70f34f259f82b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Reggie Littlejohn"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.womensrightswithoutfrontiers.org"],"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/reggie-littlejohn\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78987"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/383"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=78987"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78987\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":78992,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78987\/revisions\/78992"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/71995"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=78987"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=78987"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=78987"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}