{"id":74679,"date":"2015-09-21T16:52:05","date_gmt":"2015-09-21T20:52:05","guid":{"rendered":"\/news\/?p=74679"},"modified":"2016-02-18T00:41:50","modified_gmt":"2016-02-18T05:41:50","slug":"house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/","title":{"rendered":"House vote on born-alive protection divides lawmakers"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><p>When Congress considered the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/107th-congress\/house-bill\/2175\">Born-Alive Infants Protection Act<\/a> in 2002, it <a href=\"http:\/\/thomas.loc.gov\/cgi-bin\/bdquery\/z?d107:HR02175:@@@X\">passed by<\/a> voice vote in the House and unanimous consent in the Senate, meaning no Democrat or pro-abortion legislators opposed it. Even NARAL <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nrlc.org\/archive\/ObamaBAIPA\/TimelineFederalBAIPA.html\">agreed not to oppose it<\/a>. Abortion\u2019s most zealous defenders knew better than to try to stick their necks out for starving newborns to death after women\u2019s \u201cchoice\u201d is no longer in play, or when protecting them wouldn\u2019t imperil their precious <em>Roe v. Wade<\/em> in any way.<\/p>\n<p>What a difference thirteen years makes.<\/p>\n<p>When the House voted last week on the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/114th-congress\/house-bill\/3504\">Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act<\/a>, which requires abortionists to get such babies to hospitals and criminalizes their deliberate murder, 177 Democrats <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lifenews.com\/2015\/09\/18\/only-5-democrats-voted-to-protect-babies-born-alive-from-planned-parenthood-harvesting-them\/\">voted against it<\/a>. A paltry five took what was their party\u2019s default position in 2002 and did the right thing.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>The President of the United States (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/article\/225404\/why-obama-really-voted-infanticide-andrew-c-mccarthy\">no stranger to<\/a> excusing this sort of thing) <a href=\"https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/omb\/legislative\/sap\/114\/saphr3134-3504r_20150916.pdf\">condemned<\/a> the bill for its likely \u201cchilling affect\u201d on \u201caccess to care\u201d\u2014while refusing to describe its contents more specifically than \u201cnew legal requirements related to the provision of abortion services in certain circumstances,\u201d a stark contrast to the paragraph\u2019s worth of complaints about defunding Planned Parenthood in the same press release.<\/p>\n<p>What could account for such a dramatic shift in the Democrats\u2019 willingness to publicly commit to murdering newborns?<\/p>\n<p>The merits of their position are no more defensible (the bill applies solely after birth),\u00a0could no more be construed as threatening legal abortions than BAIPA, and in no way threatens medical research using <a href=\"\/news\/liberal-media-ignores-difference-researching-tissue-killing-people-get\/\">ethically-obtained fetal remains<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>So the difference must be political. After all, the Democrats have certainly grown more radicalized between the two votes, <a href=\"\/news\/the-democratic-abortion-plank-through-the-twenty-first-century\/\">purging even lip service to making abortion &#8220;rare&#8221; from their party platform<\/a>. The number of pro-life Democrats in Congress has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.christianitytoday.com\/ct\/2012\/june\/pro-life-dems-dwindle.html\">declined<\/a>. And the year after the BAIPA vote, then-DNC chair Terry McAuliffe <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2003\/ALLPOLITICS\/07\/21\/column.shields.opinion.tolerant\/index.html?_s=PM:ALLPOLITICS\">snubbed Democrats for Life<\/a> from even getting a link on the DNC website. Odds are, in reevaluating what their opponents would <a href=\"\/news\/show-vote-gop-must-show-public-planned-parenthood-deserves-defunding\/\">let them get away with,<\/a>\u00a0they considered the fact that\u00a0their most recent presidential nominee managed to get elected twice despite supporting infanticide.<\/p>\n<p>It also may be the product of their pro-abortion lobbyists\u2019 desperation. Starting with the push for tightened medical regulations that have closed abortion facilities, then\u00a0exploding with The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.centerformedicalprogress.org\/\">Center for Medical Progress&#8217;<\/a>\u00a0bombshell baby-parts videos, Big Abortion\u00a0is increasingly feeling that their business is in danger. With that comes decreasing patience for political niceties, like finding common ground or appealing to the center.<\/p>\n<p>They don\u2019t want politicians they\u2019ve <a href=\"http:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/politics\/2015\/08\/13\/planned-parenthood-workers-pacs-donated-25m-to-dems-since-2000\/\">paid good money for<\/a> pandering to churchgoing soccer moms and waiting for things to blow over; they want lockstep devotion to the comforting lie that there\u2019s nothing to see here and absolute assurance that they won\u2019t have to change the way they do business one bit, no matter how politically modest or ethically inarguable.<\/p>\n<p>A ban on killing babies after birth? Sorry, agreeing to that comes way too close to admitting it\u2019s actually happening.<\/p>\n<p>Pro-life officeholders should take all this as clear signs it\u2019s time to go for the jugular, to not only keep up the pressure, but amplify it. Right now they have no more important job than making it as uncomfortable as possible to appease the abortion lobby\u2019s increasingly-monstrous demands, and forcing the Democrats to choose whether their standing in Planned Parenthood\u2019s eyes is more important to them than the American people\u2019s approval.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When Congress considered the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act in 2002, it passed by voice vote in the House and unanimous consent in the Senate, meaning no Democrat or pro-abortion legislators opposed it. Even NARAL agreed not to oppose it. Abortion\u2019s most zealous defenders knew better than to try to stick their necks out for starving [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":54,"featured_media":74681,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[11],"tags":[19,4738,5267,4906,5266,2913,4153,403,3017,611,5269,2620,3151,27,76,14,144,5268],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>House vote on born-alive protection divides lawmakers - Live Action News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"177 House Democrats voted against the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, requiring abortionists to hospitalize abortion survivors for care.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"House vote on born-alive protection divides lawmakers - Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"177 House Democrats voted against the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, requiring abortionists to hospitalize abortion survivors for care.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-09-21T20:52:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-18T05:41:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/Democrat-Donkey.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"3200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Calvin Freiburger\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Calvin Freiburger\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Calvin Freiburger\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6eb2bf94c8064b71953ba137bf413c4d\"},\"headline\":\"House vote on born-alive protection divides lawmakers\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-09-21T20:52:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-18T05:41:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/\"},\"wordCount\":582,\"commentCount\":3,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"abortion\",\"abortion lobby\",\"BAIPA\",\"born alive infants\",\"Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act\",\"Born-Alive Infants Protection Act\",\"Center for Medical Progress\",\"congress\",\"Democrat\",\"Democrats\",\"Democrats for Life\",\"extremism\",\"House of Representatives\",\"infanticide\",\"NARAL\",\"Planned Parenthood\",\"roe v. wade\",\"Tery McAuliffe\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Politics\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/\",\"name\":\"House vote on born-alive protection divides lawmakers - Live Action News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-09-21T20:52:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-18T05:41:50+00:00\",\"description\":\"177 House Democrats voted against the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, requiring abortionists to hospitalize abortion survivors for care.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"House vote on born-alive protection divides lawmakers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6eb2bf94c8064b71953ba137bf413c4d\",\"name\":\"Calvin Freiburger\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e27533b6967b0c47cce543ba67e2a7a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e27533b6967b0c47cce543ba67e2a7a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Calvin Freiburger\"},\"description\":\"Calvin Freiburger is a Wisconsin-based conservative writer and 2011 Hillsdale College graduate, dedicated to the principles of the American Founding\u2014individual liberty, limited government, public virtue, free markets, and strong defense\u2014though he believes no issue is more important than defending the unalienable rights of society\u2019s most vulnerable members. Calvin is an editor and administrator for TheFederalistPapers.org, and his work has appeared on NewsRealBlog.com, PatriotUpdate.com, LifeNews.com, LifeSiteNews.com, RightWisconsin.com, AmericanThinker.com, Stream.org, AmericanClarion.org, and more. Please check out his official website, ConservativeStandards.com. Follow @CalFreiburger\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/calvin-freiburger\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"House vote on born-alive protection divides lawmakers - Live Action News","description":"177 House Democrats voted against the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, requiring abortionists to hospitalize abortion survivors for care.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"House vote on born-alive protection divides lawmakers - Live Action News","og_description":"177 House Democrats voted against the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, requiring abortionists to hospitalize abortion survivors for care.","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2015-09-21T20:52:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-18T05:41:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":3200,"height":1800,"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/Democrat-Donkey.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Calvin Freiburger","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@liveaction","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Calvin Freiburger","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/"},"author":{"name":"Calvin Freiburger","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6eb2bf94c8064b71953ba137bf413c4d"},"headline":"House vote on born-alive protection divides lawmakers","datePublished":"2015-09-21T20:52:05+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-18T05:41:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/"},"wordCount":582,"commentCount":3,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"keywords":["abortion","abortion lobby","BAIPA","born alive infants","Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act","Born-Alive Infants Protection Act","Center for Medical Progress","congress","Democrat","Democrats","Democrats for Life","extremism","House of Representatives","infanticide","NARAL","Planned Parenthood","roe v. wade","Tery McAuliffe"],"articleSection":["Politics"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/","name":"House vote on born-alive protection divides lawmakers - Live Action News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-09-21T20:52:05+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-18T05:41:50+00:00","description":"177 House Democrats voted against the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, requiring abortionists to hospitalize abortion survivors for care.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/house-vote-born-alive-protection-marks-new-low-party-abortion\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"House vote on born-alive protection divides lawmakers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6eb2bf94c8064b71953ba137bf413c4d","name":"Calvin Freiburger","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e27533b6967b0c47cce543ba67e2a7a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e27533b6967b0c47cce543ba67e2a7a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Calvin Freiburger"},"description":"Calvin Freiburger is a Wisconsin-based conservative writer and 2011 Hillsdale College graduate, dedicated to the principles of the American Founding\u2014individual liberty, limited government, public virtue, free markets, and strong defense\u2014though he believes no issue is more important than defending the unalienable rights of society\u2019s most vulnerable members. Calvin is an editor and administrator for TheFederalistPapers.org, and his work has appeared on NewsRealBlog.com, PatriotUpdate.com, LifeNews.com, LifeSiteNews.com, RightWisconsin.com, AmericanThinker.com, Stream.org, AmericanClarion.org, and more. Please check out his official website, ConservativeStandards.com. Follow @CalFreiburger","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/calvin-freiburger\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74679"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/54"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74679"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74679\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":88185,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74679\/revisions\/88185"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74681"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74679"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74679"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74679"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}