{"id":7248,"date":"2011-10-19T18:21:07","date_gmt":"2011-10-19T22:21:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/liveaction.org\/blog\/?p=7248"},"modified":"2013-04-01T18:51:55","modified_gmt":"2013-04-01T22:51:55","slug":"the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/","title":{"rendered":"The future of Roe: can pro-lifers afford to wait for the Supreme Court to take a stand?"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Though united in our tireless opposition to abortion, many pro-lifers disagree about how to most effectively fight it. One school of thought holds that we should chip away at abortion with incremental reforms like parental notification<\/a> and sonogram bills<\/a>, and wait until Roe v. Wade<\/a><\/em> gets overturned to attempt more comprehensive abortion bans, since the latter would just get struck down by the courts anyway. Others think we should try to bypass Roe<\/em> completely with a constitutional amendment<\/a> permanently securing the rights of the unborn in American law.<\/p>\n

Both sides have a compelling pragmatic case, but there is one critical point which I believe incrementalist arguments don\u2019t sufficiently account for: Roe\u2019s<\/em> overturn is nowhere near as close as many would like to believe.<\/p>\n

Conventional wisdom holds that there are currently four anti-Roe<\/em> justices on the Supreme Court\u2014Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, and Samuel Alito\u2014so only one more is needed for a majority. But in reality, while Scalia<\/a> and Thomas<\/a> are reliable, the jury\u2019s still out on Roberts and Alito.<\/p>\n

As Deputy Solicitor General, Roberts coauthored a 1991 brief<\/a> arguing against Roe<\/em>, and he did vote to uphold the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act in Gonzales v. Carhart<\/a><\/em>. However, in Gonzales<\/em> he declined to join Thomas and Scalia in a concurring opinion that called for Roe\u2019s<\/em> overturn, and most troubling, during his Senate confirmation hearings<\/a> he said:<\/p>\n

Roe v. Wade is the settled law of the land. It’s a little more than settled. It was reaffirmed in the face of a challenge that it should be overruled in the Casey decision. Accordingly, it’s the settled law of the land. There’s nothing in my personal views that would prevent me from fully and faithfully applying that precedent, as well as Casey.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Alito\u2019s abortion record is also mixed<\/a>, containing instances where he has both upheld and struck down pro-life laws. As a White House lawyer in 1985, he argued<\/a> President Reagan\u2019s position that Roe<\/em> should be overturned, and in his 2006 Senate confirmation testimony<\/a> he merely said of Roe<\/em> that he \u201cwould approach the question with an open mind.\u201d But his testimony was also far too deferential to the concept of stare decisis<\/em> (the authority of past rulings):<\/p>\n

[I]t’s important because it reflects the view that courts should respect the judgments and the wisdom that are embodied in prior judicial decisions. It’s not an exorable command, but it is a general presumption that courts are going to follow prior precedents [\u2026] <\/em>I don’t agree with the theory that the Constitution always trumps stare decisis. <\/em><\/strong>There would be no room for the doctrine of stare decisis in constitutional law if that were the case. [Emphasis added.]<\/em><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

So we might<\/em> only need one more vote to vanquish Roe<\/em>\u2026or we might need three. And that\u2019s assuming the next president will appoint pro-lifers, rather than brand-new pro-aborts. That\u2019s also assuming that Scalia (age 75) and Thomas (age 63) remain on the Court long enough to rule on abortion again. Barack Obama appointing a relatively young replacement for either judge is all it would take to ensure that Roe<\/em> continues to dominate US abortion law for another generation.<\/p>\n

Granted, considering the public’s mixed feelings<\/a> about abortion, reaching the high bar necessary<\/a> to amend the Constitution (passage by two thirds of Congress or 33 states, then ratification by 38 states) would also be a difficult, long-term battle. Even so, we at the grassroots level can at least do something<\/em> about public opinion, whereas our influence over the judiciary is virtually nonexistent.<\/p>\n

We may sometimes struggle to determine the right strategies in the battle against abortion, but one thing should be clear to everyone: we won\u2019t get anywhere if we simply wait for someone else to tear down roadblocks like Roe v. Wade<\/em> for us.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Though united in our tireless opposition to abortion, many pro-lifers disagree about how to most effectively fight it. One school of thought holds that we should chip away at abortion with incremental reforms like parental notification and sonogram bills, and wait until Roe v. Wade gets overturned to attempt more comprehensive abortion bans, since the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":54,"featured_media":30615,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[15,3],"tags":[1093,1094,1095,1096,1097,144,1098,197],"yoast_head":"\nThe future of Roe: can pro-lifers afford to wait for the Supreme Court to take a stand? - Live Action News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The future of Roe: can pro-lifers afford to wait for the Supreme Court to take a stand? - Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Though united in our tireless opposition to abortion, many pro-lifers disagree about how to most effectively fight it. One school of thought holds that we should chip away at abortion with incremental reforms like parental notification and sonogram bills, and wait until Roe v. Wade gets overturned to attempt more comprehensive abortion bans, since the […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-10-19T22:21:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2013-04-01T22:51:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/05\/Supreme_Court_US_20101.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"900\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Calvin Freiburger\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Calvin Freiburger\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Calvin Freiburger\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6eb2bf94c8064b71953ba137bf413c4d\"},\"headline\":\"The future of Roe: can pro-lifers afford to wait for the Supreme Court to take a stand?\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-10-19T22:21:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-04-01T22:51:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/\"},\"wordCount\":647,\"commentCount\":12,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Antonin Scalia\",\"Clarence Thomas\",\"Gonzales v. Carhart\",\"John Roberts\",\"Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act\",\"roe v. wade\",\"Samuel Alito\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Analysis\",\"Opinion\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/\",\"name\":\"The future of Roe: can pro-lifers afford to wait for the Supreme Court to take a stand? - Live Action News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-10-19T22:21:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-04-01T22:51:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The future of Roe: can pro-lifers afford to wait for the Supreme Court to take a stand?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6eb2bf94c8064b71953ba137bf413c4d\",\"name\":\"Calvin Freiburger\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e27533b6967b0c47cce543ba67e2a7a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e27533b6967b0c47cce543ba67e2a7a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Calvin Freiburger\"},\"description\":\"Calvin Freiburger is a Wisconsin-based conservative writer and 2011 Hillsdale College graduate, dedicated to the principles of the American Founding\u2014individual liberty, limited government, public virtue, free markets, and strong defense\u2014though he believes no issue is more important than defending the unalienable rights of society\u2019s most vulnerable members. Calvin is an editor and administrator for TheFederalistPapers.org, and his work has appeared on NewsRealBlog.com, PatriotUpdate.com, LifeNews.com, LifeSiteNews.com, RightWisconsin.com, AmericanThinker.com, Stream.org, AmericanClarion.org, and more. Please check out his official website, ConservativeStandards.com. Follow @CalFreiburger\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/calvin-freiburger\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The future of Roe: can pro-lifers afford to wait for the Supreme Court to take a stand? - Live Action News","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The future of Roe: can pro-lifers afford to wait for the Supreme Court to take a stand? - Live Action News","og_description":"Though united in our tireless opposition to abortion, many pro-lifers disagree about how to most effectively fight it. One school of thought holds that we should chip away at abortion with incremental reforms like parental notification and sonogram bills, and wait until Roe v. Wade gets overturned to attempt more comprehensive abortion bans, since the […]","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2011-10-19T22:21:07+00:00","article_modified_time":"2013-04-01T22:51:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":900,"height":600,"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/05\/Supreme_Court_US_20101.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Calvin Freiburger","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@liveaction","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Calvin Freiburger","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/"},"author":{"name":"Calvin Freiburger","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6eb2bf94c8064b71953ba137bf413c4d"},"headline":"The future of Roe: can pro-lifers afford to wait for the Supreme Court to take a stand?","datePublished":"2011-10-19T22:21:07+00:00","dateModified":"2013-04-01T22:51:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/"},"wordCount":647,"commentCount":12,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"keywords":["Antonin Scalia","Clarence Thomas","Gonzales v. Carhart","John Roberts","Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act","roe v. wade","Samuel Alito","Supreme Court"],"articleSection":["Analysis","Opinion"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/","name":"The future of Roe: can pro-lifers afford to wait for the Supreme Court to take a stand? - Live Action News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-10-19T22:21:07+00:00","dateModified":"2013-04-01T22:51:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/the-future-of-roe-can-pro-lifers-afford-to-wait-for-the-supreme-court-to-take-a-stand\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The future of Roe: can pro-lifers afford to wait for the Supreme Court to take a stand?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6eb2bf94c8064b71953ba137bf413c4d","name":"Calvin Freiburger","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e27533b6967b0c47cce543ba67e2a7a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e27533b6967b0c47cce543ba67e2a7a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Calvin Freiburger"},"description":"Calvin Freiburger is a Wisconsin-based conservative writer and 2011 Hillsdale College graduate, dedicated to the principles of the American Founding\u2014individual liberty, limited government, public virtue, free markets, and strong defense\u2014though he believes no issue is more important than defending the unalienable rights of society\u2019s most vulnerable members. Calvin is an editor and administrator for TheFederalistPapers.org, and his work has appeared on NewsRealBlog.com, PatriotUpdate.com, LifeNews.com, LifeSiteNews.com, RightWisconsin.com, AmericanThinker.com, Stream.org, AmericanClarion.org, and more. Please check out his official website, ConservativeStandards.com. Follow @CalFreiburger","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/calvin-freiburger\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7248"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/54"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7248"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7248\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/30615"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7248"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7248"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7248"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}