{"id":67691,"date":"2015-07-23T07:30:16","date_gmt":"2015-07-23T11:30:16","guid":{"rendered":"\/news\/?p=67691"},"modified":"2015-07-23T14:11:49","modified_gmt":"2015-07-23T18:11:49","slug":"new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/","title":{"rendered":" New York Times <\/em> shames journalism with presumptuous editorial on Planned Parenthood"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

Since when did the editorial board of the top consumer paper in the nation resort to sounding like an angry teenager in a fight? Since now, it seems.<\/p>\n

An editorial in the New York Times<\/em> Wednesday<\/a> brings shame to the journalistic standards of the paper. An editorial is not an opinion column where one person is writing his or her opinion. An editorial is written as the voice of the paper to its readers. Frankly, the Times<\/em>\u2019 take on Planned Parenthood would have been equally as ineffective as a signed opinion column anyway. Instead the board gets to share the shame.<\/p>\n

The opening of the editorial says:<\/p>\n

\n

A hidden-camera video<\/a> released last week purported to show that Planned Parenthood illegally sells tissue from aborted fetuses. It shows nothing of the sort. But it is the latest in a series of unrelenting attacks on Planned Parenthood, which offers health care services to millions of people every year. The politicians howling to defund Planned Parenthood care nothing about the truth here, being perfectly willing to undermine women\u2019s reproductive rights any way they can.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\"Andrew

Andrew Rosenthal<\/p><\/div>\n

The New York Times<\/em> shows its bias and unwillingness to consider that there might be merit to the video. In fact, it\u2019s a bold statement to make after only two videos have been released when\u00a0the Times knows more are coming. However it\u2019s not surprising that this is a biased, one-sided take. The paper\u2019s editorial page editor, Andrew Rosenthal, has said publicly:<\/a>\u00a0“We are strong believers in the right to privacy and the associated right to reproductive choice.”<\/p>\n

So much for balance.<\/p>\n

But wait, people cry, it\u2019s an editorial<\/em>. It\u2019s supposed to take a side. Well, sort of. As Rosenthal said in this video<\/a> where he offers seven tips for writing an effective editorial, editorials must be \u201cbased in principle but also based in fact.\u201d Clearly the Times<\/em> missed the fact part – even though Rosenthal hammers this home in his video, adding:<\/p>\n

\n

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion; you\u2019re not entitled to your own facts.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s nothing that\u2019s going to undermine your editorial faster than a fact you got wrong that you did not have to get wrong.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Yet the tone and dogma of the editorial shows there is not the remotest of considerations that Planned Parenthood could do any wrong. Rosenthal is correct that we are not entitled to our own facts, but clearly the board\u2019s love for the abortion giant clouds its ability to look beyond the rhetoric of Planned Parenthood to the facts.<\/p>\n

It continues with these statements:<\/p>\n

\n

According to a letter<\/a> sent by Roger Evans, a lawyer for Planned Parenthood, to the House Energy and Commerce Committee, the video is a result of a years long campaign of deception.<\/p>\n

The Center for Medical Progress \u2014 which managed to get tax-exempt status in 2013 as a biomedicine charity, according to a report by The Huffington Post \u2014 <\/a>appears to have done little beyond producing the undercover video.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\"Roger

Roger Evans<\/p><\/div>\n

First, using Evans’ letter as a reliable source is ludicrous. The man is in charge of defending Planned Parenthood. It\u2019s like using the expensive defense attorney of a murderer as a source to offer facts about the murder.<\/p>\n

Second, the diction and connotation of this line: \u201cwhich managed to get tax-exempt status\u201d really says, \u201csomehow pulled the wool over the IRS\u2019s eyes to get a status it didn\u2019t remotely deserve.” Because Clearly the Times<\/em> has done research into the organization and knows all the ins and outs. Or not.<\/p>\n

Finally, what arrogance is displayed in this section to say the Center for Medical Progress \u201cappears to have done little beyond producing the undercover video.\u201d The assumption in making that statement – from an entire editorial board, no less, further shames the profession of journalism.<\/p>\n

How could the Times<\/em> even know what the Center for Medical Progress has actually done? Has it asked?<\/p>\n

The editorial concludes:<\/p>\n

\n

Researchers use fetal tissue to study and develop treatments for diseases and conditions like H.I.V., hepatitis, congenital heart defects, retinal degeneration and Parkinson\u2019s. Last year, the National Institutes of Health gave $76 million in grants for fetal tissue research. Planned Parenthood is certainly not the only collector of fetal tissue \u2014 clinics associated with universities also supply tissue for research.<\/p>\n

The Center for Medical Progress video campaign is a dishonest attempt to make legal, voluntary and potentially lifesaving tissue donations appear nefarious and illegal. Lawmakers responding by promoting their own anti-choice agenda are rewarding deception and putting women\u2019s health and their constitutionally protected rights at risk.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\"David

David Daleiden, leader of the Center for Medical Progress<\/p><\/div>\n

Yes, researchers use some fetal tissue for studying diseases. And it\u2019s true the NIH gives large amounts of money to these researchers every year. It’s true the “tissue” comes from more places than Planned Parenthood, though it is the largest abortion provider in the nation. However, these statements ignore a significant point.<\/p>\n

There are ethical ways of gaining fetal tissue. Sadly, many women have miscarriages or ectopic pregnancies, which would ethically let fetal tissue be used where the method for obtaining it was not from a choice to kill. This attitude – that since they do research and the government gives people money to do it, it’s all perfectly fine \u2014 is backwards. It says the end justifies the means; that even if a child dies – is killed – maybe one day a researcher will save another child. It\u2019s a sick reasoning, and when the source is one of the most respected vehicles of journalism, it seems sicker.<\/p>\n

Centuries ago, in another, more holy writing, the prophet Isaiah warned in Isaiah 5:20:<\/p>\n

\n

Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;
\nWho put darkness for light, and light for darkness;
\nWho put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The New York Times<\/em> has chosen to call evil good and darkness light.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Since when did the editorial board of the top consumer paper in the nation resort to sounding like an angry teenager in a fight? Since now, it seems. An editorial in the New York Times Wednesday brings shame to the journalistic standards of the paper. An editorial is not an opinion column where one person […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":827,"featured_media":67706,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[3],"tags":[19,4153,4127,140,14],"yoast_head":"\nNew York Times shames journalism with presumptuous editorial on Planned Parenthood - Live Action News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The tone and dogma of Andrew Rosenthal's editorial shows there is not the remotest of considerations that Planned Parenthood could do any wrong.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"New York Times shames journalism with presumptuous editorial on Planned Parenthood - Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The tone and dogma of Andrew Rosenthal's editorial shows there is not the remotest of considerations that Planned Parenthood could do any wrong.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-07-23T11:30:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-23T18:11:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/3250539603_c6cc1a67e5_z.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"427\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Catherine Livingston, PhD\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Catherine Livingston, PhD\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Catherine Livingston, PhD\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/e546e5fbb46d771bbe66c0ab7690156c\"},\"headline\":\"New York Times shames journalism with presumptuous editorial on Planned Parenthood\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-07-23T11:30:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-23T18:11:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/\"},\"wordCount\":1025,\"commentCount\":4,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"abortion\",\"Center for Medical Progress\",\"fetal parts\",\"New York Times\",\"Planned Parenthood\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Opinion\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/\",\"name\":\"New York Times shames journalism with presumptuous editorial on Planned Parenthood - Live Action News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-07-23T11:30:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-23T18:11:49+00:00\",\"description\":\"The tone and dogma of Andrew Rosenthal's editorial shows there is not the remotest of considerations that Planned Parenthood could do any wrong.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"New York Times shames journalism with presumptuous editorial on Planned Parenthood\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/e546e5fbb46d771bbe66c0ab7690156c\",\"name\":\"Catherine Livingston, PhD\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/429a591954a90dff112876f5f329b226?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/429a591954a90dff112876f5f329b226?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Catherine Livingston, PhD\"},\"description\":\"Catherine Livingston holds a PhD in education from a major U.S. university, and is a researcher and writer who has been a teacher and speaker in the pro-life movement since 2008. Born as the result of rape, she was placed for adoption and is passionate about issues of life.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/catherine-livingston\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"New York Times shames journalism with presumptuous editorial on Planned Parenthood - Live Action News","description":"The tone and dogma of Andrew Rosenthal's editorial shows there is not the remotest of considerations that Planned Parenthood could do any wrong.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"New York Times shames journalism with presumptuous editorial on Planned Parenthood - Live Action News","og_description":"The tone and dogma of Andrew Rosenthal's editorial shows there is not the remotest of considerations that Planned Parenthood could do any wrong.","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2015-07-23T11:30:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-23T18:11:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":640,"height":427,"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/3250539603_c6cc1a67e5_z.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Catherine Livingston, PhD","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@liveaction","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Catherine Livingston, PhD","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/"},"author":{"name":"Catherine Livingston, PhD","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/e546e5fbb46d771bbe66c0ab7690156c"},"headline":"New York Times shames journalism with presumptuous editorial on Planned Parenthood","datePublished":"2015-07-23T11:30:16+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-23T18:11:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/"},"wordCount":1025,"commentCount":4,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"keywords":["abortion","Center for Medical Progress","fetal parts","New York Times","Planned Parenthood"],"articleSection":["Opinion"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/","name":"New York Times shames journalism with presumptuous editorial on Planned Parenthood - Live Action News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-07-23T11:30:16+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-23T18:11:49+00:00","description":"The tone and dogma of Andrew Rosenthal's editorial shows there is not the remotest of considerations that Planned Parenthood could do any wrong.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-shames-journalism-presumptuous-editorial-planned-parenthood\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"New York Times shames journalism with presumptuous editorial on Planned Parenthood"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/e546e5fbb46d771bbe66c0ab7690156c","name":"Catherine Livingston, PhD","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/429a591954a90dff112876f5f329b226?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/429a591954a90dff112876f5f329b226?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Catherine Livingston, PhD"},"description":"Catherine Livingston holds a PhD in education from a major U.S. university, and is a researcher and writer who has been a teacher and speaker in the pro-life movement since 2008. Born as the result of rape, she was placed for adoption and is passionate about issues of life.","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/catherine-livingston\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67691"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/827"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67691"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67691\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":67814,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67691\/revisions\/67814"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/67706"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67691"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67691"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67691"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}