{"id":330713,"date":"2025-05-05T14:43:34","date_gmt":"2025-05-05T19:43:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/news\/?p=330713"},"modified":"2025-05-04T23:34:44","modified_gmt":"2025-05-05T04:34:44","slug":"devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/","title":{"rendered":"He devised a scheme to get pro-lifers jailed for a decade. Is he now being called to account?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The attorney who devised the strategy behind a series of high-profile prosecutions against pro-life advocates under the Biden administration has been asked to appear before the House Judiciary Committee (HJC).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">According to a recent HJC <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/judiciary.house.gov\/media\/press-releases\/chairman-jordan-demands-special-counsel-weiss-and-biden-harris-doj-officials\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">press release<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, Sanjay Patel is one of eight Department of Justice (DOJ) officials requested \u201cto testify about the DOJ&#8217;s misconduct and weaponization during the Biden-Harris Administration.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Under the Biden administration, the number of federal prosecutions against pro-life advocates <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/doj-twisting-conspiracy-law-penalize-pro-lifers\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">skyrocketed<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, leading many to <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/pam-bondi-investigation-biden-doj-targeting-prolifers\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">conclude<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> that Biden\u2019s DOJ <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/hearing-weaponization-doj-pro-lifers\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">disproportionately and unfairly targeted<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> pro-life Americans.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Patel played a pivotal role in advancing these <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/dailycaller.com\/2024\/07\/30\/joe-biden-department-justice-doj-face-act-pro-life-conspiracy-against-rights\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">unprecedented prosecutorial efforts<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. He resurrected a law 150+ years old that was crafted to combat Ku Klux Klan crimes and used it to exponentially extend prison sentences for non-violent pro-life activists. That law originally sought to curtail civil rights violations against a vulnerable population; ironically, pro-life advocates attempting to achieve the same goal within a different context fell prey to Patel\u2019s scheme to twist the law into a weapon against them.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Now, members of the House Judiciary Committee appear to have <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/judiciary.house.gov\/sites\/evo-subsites\/republicans-judiciary.house.gov\/files\/evo-media-document\/2025-03-18-jdj-to-bondi-doj-re-ti-requests.pdf\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">asked<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Patel to explain his actions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Patel\u2019s Novel Strategy<\/b><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/sanjay-patel-53199420\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sanjay Patel<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> has been a federal prosecutor in the criminal section of the DOJ\u2019s Civil Rights Division since January 2011. A <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/search.justice.gov\/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&amp;affiliate=justice-archive&amp;query=%22Sanjay+Patel%22\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">search<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> of the DOJ\u2019s website suggests that Patel has primarily prosecuted law enforcement officials and pro-lifers during his tenure in that role.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">According to his <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/docs.house.gov\/meetings\/JU\/JU10\/20241218\/117765\/HHRG-118-JU10-Wstate-VaughnP-20241218.pdf#page=39\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">self-penned bio<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, he has also \u201cserved as the Director of the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/crt\/national-task-force-violence-against-reproductive-health-care-providers\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Task Force on Violence Against Reproductive Health Care Providers<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u201d Although the stated aim of the task force is to prosecute incidents of \u201cclinic violence,\u201d its list of <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/crt\/recent-cases-violence-against-reproductive-health-care-providers\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">recent cases<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> includes several in which no actual <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/dictionary.cambridge.org\/us\/dictionary\/english\/violence\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">violence<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> occurred.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In March 2022, the DOJ\u2019s Journal of Law and Practice published an <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/usao\/page\/file\/1492851\/dl?inline\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">article<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> written by Patel titled \u201cFACE Off with Anti-Abortion Extremism\u2014Criminal Enforcement of 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 248 (FACE Act).\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The article provides historical context for and a legal explanation of the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/18\/248\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">FACE Act<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which prohibits the physical obstruction of abortion facilities, pregnancy centers, and places of worship. It also prohibits intentional property damage at those locations and the intimidation of or interference with individuals engaged in obtaining or providing related services or attempting to exercise their religious rights. <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the article, Patel outlined a novel strategy for prosecuting pro-lifers who have engaged in activism at abortion facilities. Suggesting that the statutory penalties allowed by the FACE Act are insufficient because \u201cUnless bodily injury or death results, the FACE Act does not have felony penalties,\u201d Patel proposed:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Because other applicable statu[t]es may provide stronger penalties, prosecutors should consider charging other federal offenses in addition to FACE Act violations. \u2026<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">FACE Act violations are often planned and coordinated offenses that involve more than one subject. In those situations, the investigations may reveal evidence that support[s] conspiracy charges in addition to the underlying offense.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Patel further suggested: \u201c\u200b\u200bAlthough criminal conspiracy offenses are usually charged under <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/18\/371\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">18 U.S.C. \u00a7 371<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, a conspiracy to commit a FACE Act offense should be charged under <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/18\/241\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">18 U.S.C. \u00a7 241<\/span><\/a> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2014 conspiracy against rights.\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>READ: <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-harris-doj-persecution-peaceful-pro-lifers\/\"><em>How Roe\u2019s reversal triggered the Biden-Harris DOJ\u2019s persecution of peaceful pro-lifers<\/em><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Patel argued that \u201cconspiracy against rights\u201d charges are a superior option because they have \u201cthree advantages\u201d over conspiracy charges under section 371:<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">First, unlike a section 371 conspiracy, <\/span><\/i><b><i>a section 241 conspiracy conviction is always a felony, even when the underlying substantive violation would be a misdemeanor.<\/i><\/b><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Second, section 241 violations are punishable by up to 10 years\u2019 imprisonment; or up to life or the death penalty, if certain aggravators apply. And third, under section 241, <\/span><\/i><b><i>the government is not required to prove an overt act or substantial step in furtherance of the agreement <\/i><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">[emphases added]<\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In other words, Patel advocated for applying \u201cconspiracy against rights\u201d charges because they facilitate more extreme penalties for pro-life activism than what the FACE Act intended and because no action by the accused is necessary to prove a conspiracy\u2014all that need be proven is that the \u201cconspirators\u201d engaged in the same thoughtcrime.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>\u201cConspiracy Against Rights\u201d: Background, Context, and Timeline<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Section 241 <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawfaremedia.org\/article\/three-questions-about-section-241-the-conspiracy-against-rights-statute\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">originates<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> from the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.senate.gov\/artandhistory\/history\/common\/image\/EnforcementAct_1870_Page_1.htm\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Enforcement Act of 1870<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which was a response to the Ku Klux Klan\u2019s efforts \u2014 including murder \u2014 to <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.senate.gov\/artandhistory\/history\/common\/generic\/EnforcementActs.htm\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">prevent<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Black Americans from exercising their civil rights during the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.history.com\/articles\/reconstruction\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Reconstruction<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> era.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Patel not only crafted the strategy to apply the 150-year-old law to thwart modern efforts to achieve the same goal \u2014 namely, protecting the civil rights of a vulnerable population routinely targeted for murder \u2014 but he also personally prosecuted many of the pro-lifers pursued by Biden\u2019s DOJ.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Those cases were not prosecuted in a civic vacuum. The timeline of events suggests the string of FACE charges filed by Biden\u2019s DOJ \u2014 particularly those paired with \u201cconspiracy against rights\u201d \u2014 was a <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-harris-doj-persecution-peaceful-pro-lifers\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">direct response<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> to the fall of <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe v. Wade<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On December 1, 2021, the Supreme Court heard <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pro-life-rally-oral-arguments\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">oral arguments<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> in <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Dobbs v. Jackson Women\u2019s Health Organization<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which ultimately overturned <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. As early as that day, statements made during oral arguments led many journalists and SCOTUS pundits to <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scotusblog.com\/2021\/12\/majority-of-court-appears-poised-to-uphold-mississippis-ban-on-most-abortions-after-15-weeks\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">conclude<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> that the Court seemed inclined to overturn <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On March 30, 2022 \u2014 just shy of four months later \u2014 nine pro-life advocates were <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/usao-dc\/pr\/nine-defendants-indicted-federal-civil-rights-conspiracy-and-freedom-access-clinic\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">indicted<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> on conspiracy against rights and FACE Act charges for <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/nine-pro-life-activists-arrested-fbi-dc\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">activism<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> that took place in October 2020. Another <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/atheist-pro-lifer-indicted-face-act-doj\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">individual<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> was later <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/archives\/opa\/pr\/pennsylvania-man-indicted-freedom-access-clinic-entrances-act-and-conspiracy-against-rights\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">indicted<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> on the same charges in relation to the same incident.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This was the first time pro-life advocates had <em>ever<\/em> been charged with \u201cconspiracy against rights.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On May 2, 2022, a <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-overturn-roe-leaked-opinion\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">draft<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> of the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Dobbs <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">decision<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">indicating the Court would overturn <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> was leaked to <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2022\/05\/02\/supreme-court-abortion-draft-opinion-00029473\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Politico<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. On June 24, the decision was <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-overturned-roe-pro-life-fight\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">officially handed down<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On September 23, 2022, just three months later, <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/fbi-raids-pro-life-traumatize-children\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mark Houck<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> was <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/usao-edpa\/pr\/bucks-county-man-indicted-federal-charges-assaulting-reproductive-healthcare-clinic\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">indicted<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> on FACE charges for an incident that occurred almost a year beforehand, in October 2021.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On September 29, 2022, Christopher Moscinski, better known as <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/catholic-priest-found-guilty-abortion-facility\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Father Fidelis<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, was <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20220929155652\/https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/usao-edny\/pr\/defendant-charged-blocking-access-planned-parenthood-health-center-long-island\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">indicted<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> on FACE charges for actions undertaken in July.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On October 5, 2022, 11 pro-lifers were <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/usao-mdtn\/pr\/eleven-charged-face-act-violations-stemming-2021-blockade-mount-juliet-reproductive\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">indicted<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> on FACE and conspiracy against rights charges stemming from <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/fbi-charges-multiple-individuals-peaceful-protests-abortion\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">activism<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> conducted in March 2021.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On December 16, 2022, two pro-lifers were <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/usao-sdny\/pr\/two-tennessee-individuals-charged-manhattan-federal-court-violating-freedom-access\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">indicted<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> both for violating and conspiring to violate the FACE Act following <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/manhattan-pro-life-charged-face-act\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">activism<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> conducted <em>2.5 years earlier<\/em>, in June 2020.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">And in February 2023, eight pro-lifers were <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/usao-edmi\/pr\/eight-defendants-indicted-michigan-obstructing-reproductive-health-services-facility\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">indicted<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> on FACE and conspiracy against rights charges for <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/pro-lifers-guilty-michigan-face-act\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">activism<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> which also took place 2.5 years prior, in August 2020.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>False Definitions and Farcical \u201cJustice\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Patel personally prosecuted 10 of these pro-lifers. His name appears on the indictments for an additional 12. Almost all of those charged with FACE violations by Biden\u2019s DOJ were convicted; <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/sentencing-crime-new-york-pro-lifer-face-act\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">some<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> were <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/sentencing-continues-four-pro-life-activists-dc\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">sentenced<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> to spend <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/sentencing-pro-life-activists-judge-abortion-need\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">multiple years<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> in federal prison.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The fact that these individuals were not federally charged for their alleged crimes until months and even years after the fact\u2014not until <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> was either clearly threatened or officially overturned\u2014is noteworthy.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Attorney Aaron Mysliwiec, who represented two FACE defendants, <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/sentencing-crime-new-york-pro-lifer-face-act\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">observed<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">: \u201cIt seems clear from the tea leaves that \u2026 [the] DOJ decided in the wake of <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Dobbs<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> to search out and prosecute a number of cases that they thought were FACE Act violations, whereas before <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Dobbs<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, they didn\u2019t view them as serious enough to prosecute.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ironically, none of the cases in which a \u201cconspiracy against rights\u201d was alleged were tried until <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">after<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> the Supreme Court had corrected <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which manufactured the false \u201cright\u201d to abortion.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">But just as <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/defendants-dc-face-act-detained-convicted\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">stretching the definition<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> of \u201cviolence\u201d to encompass non-violence and unjustly punish pro-lifers has been a hallmark of Patel\u2019s career, he has also predicated many of his attacks against pro-lifers upon an <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/pro-lifer-face-act-tennessee-goal-christ\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">erroneous definition of what constitutes a \u201cright.\u201d<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It would appear that the tide is turning, however. Those who were convicted of FACE violations and \u201cconspiracy against rights\u201d by Biden\u2019s DOJ have been subsequently <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/president-trump-pardons-pro-lifers-face-act-biden\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">pardoned<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> by President Trump. But as the president himself said, they should never have been prosecuted in the first place.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Congress has already <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/judiciary.house.gov\/committee-activity\/hearings\/revisiting-implications-face-act\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">taken steps<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> to <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/judiciary.house.gov\/committee-activity\/hearings\/revisiting-implications-face-act-part-ii\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">investigate<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> why these events occurred and to prevent future recurrence. The latest of these efforts is the request for testimony from the main actors responsible for promulgating this injustice \u2014 including Sanjay Patel.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">How he might attempt to explain his actions remains to be seen.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/actnow.io\/G3Bhv6M\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-325597\" src=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/LA25DefundPP_EmailBannerAd-02-1-700x251.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"700\" height=\"251\" srcset=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/LA25DefundPP_EmailBannerAd-02-1-700x251.png 700w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/LA25DefundPP_EmailBannerAd-02-1-300x107.png 300w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/LA25DefundPP_EmailBannerAd-02-1-768x275.png 768w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/LA25DefundPP_EmailBannerAd-02-1-500x179.png 500w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/LA25DefundPP_EmailBannerAd-02-1.png 1167w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The attorney who devised the strategy behind a series of high-profile prosecutions against pro-life advocates under the Biden administration has been asked to appear before the House Judiciary Committee (HJC).\u00a0 According to a recent HJC press release, Sanjay Patel is one of eight Department of Justice (DOJ) officials requested \u201cto testify about the DOJ&#8217;s misconduct [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":788,"featured_media":330714,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>He devised a scheme to get pro-lifers jailed for a decade. Is he now being called to account?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Patel resurrected a 150-year-old law crafted to combat the KKK and used it to exponentially extend non-violent pro-lifers&#039; prison sentences.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"He devised a scheme to get pro-lifers jailed for a decade. Is he now being called to account?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patel resurrected a 150-year-old law crafted to combat the KKK and used it to exponentially extend non-violent pro-lifers&#039; prison sentences.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-05T19:43:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-05-05T04:34:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/GettyImages-2212809438-department-of-justice-doj.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"650\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bettina di Fiore\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bettina di Fiore\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bettina di Fiore\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/189f8a60121ec1992ae74917a7134f0f\"},\"headline\":\"He devised a scheme to get pro-lifers jailed for a decade. Is he now being called to account?\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-05T19:43:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-05-05T04:34:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/\"},\"wordCount\":1350,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Politics\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/\",\"name\":\"He devised a scheme to get pro-lifers jailed for a decade. Is he now being called to account?\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-05T19:43:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-05-05T04:34:44+00:00\",\"description\":\"Patel resurrected a 150-year-old law crafted to combat the KKK and used it to exponentially extend non-violent pro-lifers' prison sentences.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"He devised a scheme to get pro-lifers jailed for a decade. Is he now being called to account?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/189f8a60121ec1992ae74917a7134f0f\",\"name\":\"Bettina di Fiore\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3e31061bd16493d73f3e184e7dfec4d3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3e31061bd16493d73f3e184e7dfec4d3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bettina di Fiore\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/bettina-di-fiore\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"He devised a scheme to get pro-lifers jailed for a decade. Is he now being called to account?","description":"Patel resurrected a 150-year-old law crafted to combat the KKK and used it to exponentially extend non-violent pro-lifers' prison sentences.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"He devised a scheme to get pro-lifers jailed for a decade. Is he now being called to account?","og_description":"Patel resurrected a 150-year-old law crafted to combat the KKK and used it to exponentially extend non-violent pro-lifers' prison sentences.","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2025-05-05T19:43:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-05-05T04:34:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":650,"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/GettyImages-2212809438-department-of-justice-doj.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bettina di Fiore","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@liveaction","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bettina di Fiore","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/"},"author":{"name":"Bettina di Fiore","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/189f8a60121ec1992ae74917a7134f0f"},"headline":"He devised a scheme to get pro-lifers jailed for a decade. Is he now being called to account?","datePublished":"2025-05-05T19:43:34+00:00","dateModified":"2025-05-05T04:34:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/"},"wordCount":1350,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Politics"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/","name":"He devised a scheme to get pro-lifers jailed for a decade. Is he now being called to account?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-05-05T19:43:34+00:00","dateModified":"2025-05-05T04:34:44+00:00","description":"Patel resurrected a 150-year-old law crafted to combat the KKK and used it to exponentially extend non-violent pro-lifers' prison sentences.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/devised-scheme-pro-lifers-jailed-decade-account\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"He devised a scheme to get pro-lifers jailed for a decade. Is he now being called to account?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/189f8a60121ec1992ae74917a7134f0f","name":"Bettina di Fiore","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3e31061bd16493d73f3e184e7dfec4d3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3e31061bd16493d73f3e184e7dfec4d3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Bettina di Fiore"},"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/bettina-di-fiore\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/330713"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/788"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=330713"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/330713\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":330715,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/330713\/revisions\/330715"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/330714"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=330713"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=330713"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=330713"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}