{"id":320114,"date":"2024-10-27T10:47:46","date_gmt":"2024-10-27T15:47:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/news\/?p=320114"},"modified":"2024-10-25T16:26:34","modified_gmt":"2024-10-25T21:26:34","slug":"showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/","title":{"rendered":"A &#8216;showdown&#8217; of sort is happening over abortion laws, and it could lead to a Supreme Court battle"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><p>A Comstock Act showdown could lead to a United States Supreme Court battle over abortion as states pressure various Courts to enforce the federal law, which <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/18\/1461\">prohibits<\/a> the mailing of \u201cany article, instrument, substance, drug, medicine, or thing [that] may, or can, be used or applied for producing abortion.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Currently, abortion pills are flooding into states that restrict abortion, sent illegally from abortion providers in outside states who are protected under so-called &#8216;shield laws&#8217;. As of August 2024, the Williams Institute <a href=\"https:\/\/williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu\/publications\/shield-laws-fact-sheets\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">claimed<\/a> there are &#8220;23 states and Washington, D.C.&#8221; which &#8220;have shield law protections related to reproductive health care.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>DOJ &#8220;memorandum&#8221; focuses on illegal intent of sender<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Comstock Act should be applied where the sender &#8220;intends [the items] to be used unlawfully\u201d despite a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/olc\/opinion\/file\/1560596\/dl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2022<\/a> Department of Justice (DOJ) Memorandum&#8217;s claim to the contrary.<\/p>\n<p>In December of 2022, a &#8220;Memorandum Opinion for the General Counsel United States Postal Service&#8221; authored by\u00a0 the Assistant AG for the Office of Legal Counsel, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/olc\">Christopher H. Schroeder<\/a>, attempted to answer &#8220;whether section 1461 of title 18 of the United States Code&#8221; (otherwise known as the Federal Comstock Act) &#8220;prohibits the mailing of mifepristone and misoprostol&#8230;&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That <a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/olc\/opinion\/file\/1560596\/download\">slip opinion<\/a> argued that the long-held Comstock Act did not apply where \u201cthe sender lacks the intent that the recipient will use them unlawfully.\u201d This key phrase, &#8220;intends them to be used unlawfully\u201d appears to indicate that the Comstock Act could be applicable when the sender mails abortion-inducing drugs where they <em>are<\/em> intended to be used &#8220;unlawfully.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Footnotes in the DOJ&#8217;s 2022 memorandum on the Comstock Act suggested that the &#8220;sender&#8217;s intent&#8221; is the focus of the law, while also acknowledging that &#8220;some states have independently enacted laws to restrict the mailing of these drugs for abortion purposes within their jurisdiction.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Despite this distinction, Schroeder&#8217;s memorandum claimed that because abortion-inducing drugs could have other uses, the \u201cmere mailing of such drugs to a particular jurisdiction is an insufficient basis for concluding that the sender intends them to be used unlawfully.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Federal law does not prohibit the use of mifepristone and misoprostol for producing abortions&#8230;&#8221; the DOJ opinion suggested. &#8220;This is true even when the drugs would be delivered to an address in a jurisdiction with restrictive abortion laws, because women who receive the drugs in all fifty states may, at least in some circumstances, lawfully use mifepristone and misoprostol to induce an abortion.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>As such, the DOJ&#8217;s opinion stated that &#8220;those sending or delivering mifepristone and misoprostol typically will lack complete knowledge of how the recipients intend to use them and whether that use is unlawful under relevant law.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The only problem with this statement is that abortion providers in multiple states are <em>admittedly<\/em> shipping the drugs &#8220;unlawfully&#8221; into states that prohibit them or restrict telehealth dispensing.<\/p>\n<div class=\"video-container\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">\ud83d\udea8PLEASE SHARE\ud83d\udea8<\/p>\n<p>Do you live in a state that bans abortions? With the help of mail-forwarding, you can still get safe, effective abortion pills from a doctor in days. <\/p>\n<p>RT this thread to spread the word\u2014so the people who need help learn how they can get it: <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/55kdyLGFCi\">pic.twitter.com\/55kdyLGFCi<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; mayday.health (@HealthMayday) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/HealthMayday\/status\/1540337772979838981?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 24, 2022<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/div>\n<p>A FOIA request by journalists at The Intercept uncovered that <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2024\/10\/16\/abortion-pills-mail-usps\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">drug-sniffing police dogs<\/a> in states like <a href=\"https:\/\/www.documentcloud.org\/documents\/25211474-us-postal-inspection-service-documents-on-seized-abortion-pills-in-jackson-miss\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Mississippi<\/a> (which has pro-life protections in place) recently <a href=\"https:\/\/www.documentcloud.org\/documents\/25211632-warrant-documents-related-to-search-of-mailer-containing-abortion-pills-in-jackson-miss\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">intercepted<\/a> unregulated abortion drugs coming into the state from outside the country.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The pink-envelope investigation came out of a sort of collaboration between the feds\u2019 regional offices and a local official: U.S postal workers and a city K-9 cop. Though no one in Mississippi has yet been arrested\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2023\/04\/26\/abortion-wrongful-death-texas-lawsuit\/\">for helping carry out an abortion<\/a>,&#8221; The Intercept <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2024\/10\/16\/abortion-pills-mail-usps\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">reported<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Despite this frightening scenario, the DOJ opinion insisted that &#8220;even when a sender or deliverer of mifepristone or misoprostol, including USPS, knows that a package contains such drugs\u2014or indeed that they will be used to facilitate an abortion\u2014such knowledge alone is not a sufficient basis for concluding that section 1461 has been violated,&#8221; DOJ wrote.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Accordingly, USPS could not reasonably assume that the drugs are nonmailable simply because they are being sent into a jurisdiction that significantly restricts abortion,&#8221; wrote the DOJ.<\/p>\n<p>But pro-life attorney Mike Seibel holds a different view, <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-doj-political-opinion-mailing-abortion-drugs\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">suggesting<\/a> that politics not judicial integrity was at play, \u201cMy initial reaction is that this is merely an opinion of the Biden DOJ, which will likely not prosecute under this federal law,\u201d Seibel said. \u201cHowever, when a new administration is elected, that DOJ may see it differently. Without actual litigation in the courts, this appears to be simply a political move to protect abortion.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Despite Comstock, abortion pills &#8216;illegally&#8217; flood pro-life states<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Despite the federal Comstock Act remaining active, abortion pills continue flooding into states that either restrict abortion or fully protect preborn children except when the life of the mother is at risk. As such, states are struggling to enforce their own laws.<\/p>\n<p>Shield laws, which protect abortion providers who mail abortion drugs into states that restrict the procedure do not <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/shielding-abortion-providers-consequences-women-risk\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">protect women<\/a>. Shield laws <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/abortion-pro-life-laws-risk-self-managed\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">have been credited<\/a> for 40,000 abortion pill shipments to women in the last half of 2023, according to a <a href=\"https:\/\/societyfp.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/WeCountRelease_5_14_2024.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">#WeCount report<\/a>\u00a0from May 14, 2024.<\/p>\n<p>An <a href=\"https:\/\/societyfp.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/WeCount-Report-8-June-2024-data.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">October 2024 report<\/a> published by #WeCount claimed that because of shield laws, nearly 100,000 preborn human beings were killed, despite state pro-life laws, between July of 2023 and June of 2024.<\/p>\n<p>#WeCount is\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ansirh.org\/research\/ongoing\/wecount-post-dobbs-project\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">sponsored<\/a> by the pro-abortion Society of Family Planning, which was\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.contraceptionjournal.org\/article\/S0010-7824(15)30069-X\/pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">founded<\/a>\u00a0in 2005 with contributions from the Packard Foundation, and is\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/CaroleNovielli\/status\/1204803418709209090\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">heavily funded<\/a> by both the Packard and Susan Thompson Buffett Foundations (Warren Buffett). These foundations <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/bad-actors-money-trail-abortion-pill-corruption\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">financed<\/a>\u00a0abortion pill manufacturer Danco Laboratories in its early days.<\/p>\n<p>In its <a href=\"https:\/\/societyfp.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/WeCount-Report-8-June-2024-data.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">October 2024 report<\/a>, #WeCount revealed that &#8220;In April-June 2024&#8230; an average of over 7,700 monthly telehealth abortions [were] provided under shield laws to people in states with total abortion bans or 6-week bans [23,210] and nearly 2,000 monthly telehealth abortions provided under shield laws to people in states with restrictions [6,010] that explicitly ban telehealth abortion or implicitly preclude telehealth due to in-person visit requirements.&#8221; The report added, &#8220;This amounts to an average monthly number of telehealth abortions provided under shield laws in April-June 2024 of over 9,700.&#8221;<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_320756\" style=\"width: 822px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-320756\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\" wp-image-320756\" src=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/WeCount-abortions-provided-under-state-shield-laws-2023-to-early-2024-2.jpg\" alt=\"WeCount abortions provided under state shield laws 2023 to early 2024 2\" width=\"812\" height=\"444\" srcset=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/WeCount-abortions-provided-under-state-shield-laws-2023-to-early-2024-2.jpg 1268w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/WeCount-abortions-provided-under-state-shield-laws-2023-to-early-2024-2-300x164.jpg 300w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/WeCount-abortions-provided-under-state-shield-laws-2023-to-early-2024-2-700x383.jpg 700w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/WeCount-abortions-provided-under-state-shield-laws-2023-to-early-2024-2-768x420.jpg 768w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/WeCount-abortions-provided-under-state-shield-laws-2023-to-early-2024-2-500x273.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 812px) 100vw, 812px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-320756\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">WeCount abortions provided under state shield laws 2023 to early 2024 2<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Starting in July 2023, #WeCount&#8217;s report claimed it &#8220;began to include abortions provided by licensed clinicians in states with shield laws in place. Shield laws give some legal protections to clinicians who offer abortion care via telehealth to people living in states with total abortion bans, with 6-week bans, or with laws that explicitly or implicitly preclude a component of telehealth abortion, such as requiring in-person ultrasounds,&#8221; #WeCount <a href=\"https:\/\/societyfp.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/WeCount-Report-8-June-2024-data.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">wrote<\/a>. &#8220;In this report, for the first time, we provide data on the number of abortions provided under shield laws by state, including for states with abortion bans and restrictions.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>#WeCount estimates indicated that between July 2023 and June 2024:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Nearly 25,000 abortions (24,880) were &#8220;provided under shield laws to states with telehealth restrictions.&#8221;<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Nearly 73,000 abortions (72,930) were &#8220;provided under shield laws to states with total bans and 6-week bans.&#8221;<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In other words, while the U.S. Supreme Court in the <em>Dobbs v Jackson Women&#8217;s Health Organization<\/em> case that overturned <em>Roe v. Wade<\/em> granted states authority to regulate abortion, <em><strong>shield laws enacted in abortion-liberal states are usurping laws in abortion restrictive states<\/strong><\/em> \u2014 leading to a showdown of sorts over the Comstock Act.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_320743\" style=\"width: 871px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-320743\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\" wp-image-320743\" src=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/WeCount-abortions-provided-under-state-shield-laws-2023-to-early-2024.jpg\" alt=\"#WeCount abortion estimates provided under state shield laws 2023 to June 2024\" width=\"861\" height=\"871\" srcset=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/WeCount-abortions-provided-under-state-shield-laws-2023-to-early-2024.jpg 1394w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/WeCount-abortions-provided-under-state-shield-laws-2023-to-early-2024-296x300.jpg 296w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/WeCount-abortions-provided-under-state-shield-laws-2023-to-early-2024-692x700.jpg 692w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/WeCount-abortions-provided-under-state-shield-laws-2023-to-early-2024-768x777.jpg 768w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/WeCount-abortions-provided-under-state-shield-laws-2023-to-early-2024-80x80.jpg 80w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/WeCount-abortions-provided-under-state-shield-laws-2023-to-early-2024-500x506.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 861px) 100vw, 861px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-320743\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">#WeCount abortion estimates provided under state shield laws 2023 to June 2024<\/p><\/div>\n<p><strong>Lawsuit: Three States Request Enforcement of Comstock Act<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As Live Action News <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/three-states-sue-fda-abortion-pill-expansion\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">previously<\/a> documented, Missouri, Kansas and Idaho filed a lawsuit on October 14, 2024, in Amarillo, Texas, asking the Courts to weigh in on the expansion of the abortion pill. The plaintiffs in <a href=\"https:\/\/s3.documentcloud.org\/documents\/25222818\/mifepristone-complaint.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>State of Missouri; State of Kansas; State of Idaho v. FDA<\/em><\/a> are also requesting that the Courts enforce the Comstock Act and grant them the ability to \u201cvindicate [their] sovereign, quasi-sovereign, and proprietary interests, including [their] interests in protecting [their] citizens.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In the lawsuit, the Plaintiff states allege that abortion pills (namely <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/mifepristone-miscarriage-cushing-syndrome\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">mifepristone 200mg<\/a>) come with significant dangers, and therefore, \u201cWomen face severe, even life-threatening, harm because the federal government has disregarded their health and safety.&#8221; They add that the <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/fda-abortion-pill-timeline-events\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">FDA&#8217;s decision<\/a> to allow mail order abortions has resulted in &#8220;These dangerous drugs&#8230; flooding states like Missouri and Idaho and sending women in these States to the emergency room.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Plaintiff states suggested that the FDA was reckless in disregarding the Federal Comstock Act in its expansion of the drug.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The FDA\u2019s decision to eliminate the in-person dispensing protection failed to account for or address the federal laws that prohibit the distribution of abortion drugs by postal mail, express company, or common carrier and by interactive computer service&#8230; Instead, through its words and actions FDA permitted and sometimes even encouraged these illegal activities. But a federal agency cannot authorize unlawful actions,&#8221; the lawsuit stated.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_320757\" style=\"width: 1341px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-320757\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-320757\" src=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Three-states-sue-FDA-allege-illegally-allowed-abortion-pills-by-mail-against-Comstock-Act.jpg\" alt=\"Three states sue FDA allege illegally allowed abortion pills by mail against Comstock Act\" width=\"1331\" height=\"616\" srcset=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Three-states-sue-FDA-allege-illegally-allowed-abortion-pills-by-mail-against-Comstock-Act.jpg 1331w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Three-states-sue-FDA-allege-illegally-allowed-abortion-pills-by-mail-against-Comstock-Act-300x139.jpg 300w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Three-states-sue-FDA-allege-illegally-allowed-abortion-pills-by-mail-against-Comstock-Act-700x324.jpg 700w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Three-states-sue-FDA-allege-illegally-allowed-abortion-pills-by-mail-against-Comstock-Act-768x355.jpg 768w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Three-states-sue-FDA-allege-illegally-allowed-abortion-pills-by-mail-against-Comstock-Act-500x231.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1331px) 100vw, 1331px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-320757\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Three states sue FDA allege illegally allowed abortion pills by mail against Comstock Act<\/p><\/div>\n<p>\u201cBecause a federal agency cannot permit what federal law expressly prohibits, the FDA lacked legal authority,&#8221; the Plaintiff states claimed. The suit accuses the FDA of failing \u201cto account for or address the federal laws that prohibit the distribution of abortion drugs by postal mail, express company, or common carrier and by interactive computer service.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>New Mexico Lawsuit Could Become a Potential Comstock Act Challenge to U.S. Supreme Court\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Surprisingly, perhaps the challenge most likely to succeed regarding the Comstock Act could come the pro-abortion state of New Mexico. That lawsuit originated in 2023 after the cities of <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-mexico-clovis-63rd-sanctuary-city-unborn\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Clovis<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/hobbs-first-sanctuary-city-unborn-new-mexico\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hobbs<\/a>\u00a0passed <a href=\"https:\/\/sanctuarycitiesfortheunborn.org\/comstock-ordinances\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn Ordinances<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/sanctuarycitiesfortheunborn.org\/comstock-ordinances\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">,<\/a> requiring abortion providers to comply with federal law \u2014\u00a0namely the Comstock Act.<\/p>\n<p>Immediately after the ordinances passed, New Mexico <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-mexico-supreme-court-pro-life-ordinances\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Attorney General Raul Torrez<\/a>, who has been <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/search?q=%40TorrezforNM%2C%20planned%20parenthood%20&amp;src=typed_query\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">endorsed<\/a> by Planned Parenthood,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-mexico-supreme-court-pro-life-ordinances\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">requested<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-mexico-supreme-court-stay-sanctuary-battles\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">received<\/a>\u00a0an\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/Emergency-Petition-for-Writ-of-Mandamus.pdf\">Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Request for Stay<\/a>\u00a0from the New Mexico Supreme Court, halting implementation of the ordinances. The state legislature then\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-mexico-pro-abortion-bill\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">passed<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/nmlegis.gov\/Sessions\/23%20Regular\/Amendments_In_Context\/HB0007.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HB7<\/a>, essentially declaring any ordinance that violates the state\u2019s \u201cReproductive and Gender-Affirming Health Care Freedom Act\u201d as null and void.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the AG&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/clearinghouse.net\/case\/43984\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">lawsuit<\/a>, the City of Eunice moved forward final passage of its ordinance on the same day the New Mexico AG filed suit. The <a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/1kHwoeKlQNgJ7gEFPd-RNVrya1d8-21gS\/view\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">City of Eunice<\/a> then <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/lawsuit-new-mexico-comstock-act\/\">sued<\/a> Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham and AG Torrez, setting the stage for a showdown that could make its way to the United States Supreme Court. Oral arguments at the New Mexico Supreme Court were heard in December and a decision has not yet been rendered.<\/p>\n<p>Attorney Mike Seibel, who is representing the City of Hobbs in the <a href=\"https:\/\/caselookup.nmcourts.gov\/caselookup\/app?component=cnLink&amp;page=SearchResults&amp;service=direct&amp;session=T&amp;sp=SS-1-SC-39742\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">case<\/a>, told Live Action News that &#8220;The Supreme Court of New Mexico heard oral arguments on the Hobbs ordinance, which seeks to enforce the Comstock Act, and my clients are awaiting the decision. Given the liberal makeup of the Court, we are anticipating an appeal to the United States Supreme Court on the Comstock law.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Supreme Court Hints Comstock Could Be at Play<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Should a U.S. Supreme Court challenge on the Comstock Act be submitted, there is indication that Supreme Court Justices would accept the case.<\/p>\n<p>At least two Justices previously <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/four-shocking-admissions-supreme-court-abortion-pill\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">hinted<\/a> that the Comstock Act could be in play during oral <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=3gAHaGpADvk\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">arguments<\/a> in the\u00a0<em>Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (AHM) v. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)<\/em> lawsuit, which <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/separating-fact-fiction-supreme-court-abortion-pill\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">challenged<\/a> the legitimacy of the FDA\u2019s recent expansions of the abortion pill. While not ruling on the merits of the case, the Court <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-doctors-fda-abortion-pill-safety\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">later ruled<\/a> that the Plaintiffs did not have standing.<\/p>\n<p>However, during arguments in the case, Justice Clarence Thomas grilled attorney Jessica Ellsworth, who represented abortion pill manufacturer Danco Laboratories, on why the FDA did not take into account the Comstock Act when it approved mail-order distribution of the drug.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHow do you respond to an argument that mailing your product and advertising it would violate the Comstock Act?\u201d Justice Thomas asked Danco\u2019s attorney.<\/p>\n<p>Ellsworth dodged the question, warning Justice Thomas that challenging the FDA could \u201cinvit[e] mischief,\u201d and that the Court should \u201cthink hard\u201d about that.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMy problem is, you\u2019re private,\u201d Thomas stated, suggesting that private entities are not subject to a \u201csafe harbor\u201d against federal laws.<\/p>\n<p>In addition to Thomas, Justice Samuel Alito also questioned why the FDA &#8220;had not contended with the law in its decisions on expanding access to mifepristone through the mail,&#8221; <a href=\"https:\/\/thehill.com\/policy\/healthcare\/4560476-fears-grow-over-comstock-act-justices-thomas-alito\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">wrote<\/a> The Hill.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Shouldn&#8217;t the FDA at least considered the application of 18 USC 1461?&#8221; Alito asked the FDA. \u201cThis is a prominent provision; it\u2019s not some obscure subsection of a complicated, obscure law. They knew about it. Everybody in this field knew about it. Shouldn&#8217;t they have at least addressed it?\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"video-container\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Donald Trump doesn\u2019t need to sign a law to ban abortion nationwide. Trump could try to weaponize and misuse old and outdated Comstock laws to ban abortion \u2014 without Congress. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/oAkctPNw6k\">pic.twitter.com\/oAkctPNw6k<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Planned Parenthood Action (@PPact) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/PPact\/status\/1847340904819954006?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">October 18, 2024<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/div>\n<p>The once-obscure Comstock Act is sure to make plenty of news in upcoming months as pro-abortion forces call for the law&#8217;s repeal, while pro-life states continue to fight for it to be fully enforced.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\" style=\"text-align: center;\"><span class=\"s1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/resist-pressure-to-dispense-the-abortion-pill\/\"><b><i>Urge Walmart, Costco, Kroger, and other major chains to resist pressure to dispense the abortion pill<\/i><\/b><b><i><\/i><\/b><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A Comstock Act showdown could lead to a United States Supreme Court battle over abortion as states pressure various Courts to enforce the federal law, which prohibits the mailing of \u201cany article, instrument, substance, drug, medicine, or thing [that] may, or can, be used or applied for producing abortion.\u201d Currently, abortion pills are flooding into [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":303,"featured_media":296704,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[9953,2793],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>A &#039;showdown&#039; of sort is happening over abortion laws, and it could lead to a Supreme Court battle<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Shield laws enacted in pro-abortion states are usurping laws in states with pro-life laws, leading to a showdown over the Comstock Act.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A &#039;showdown&#039; of sort is happening over abortion laws, and it could lead to a Supreme Court battle\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Shield laws enacted in pro-abortion states are usurping laws in states with pro-life laws, leading to a showdown over the Comstock Act.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-10-27T15:47:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-10-25T21:26:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/GettyImages-1212435862-abortion-pill.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"650\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Carole Novielli\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/CaroleNovielli\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Carole Novielli\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Carole Novielli\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/81ff4ca810d98b0b5b376a640452d9e6\"},\"headline\":\"A &#8216;showdown&#8217; of sort is happening over abortion laws, and it could lead to a Supreme Court battle\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-10-27T15:47:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-10-25T21:26:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/\"},\"wordCount\":2114,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Abortion Pill\",\"Activism\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/\",\"name\":\"A 'showdown' of sort is happening over abortion laws, and it could lead to a Supreme Court battle\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-10-27T15:47:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-10-25T21:26:34+00:00\",\"description\":\"Shield laws enacted in pro-abortion states are usurping laws in states with pro-life laws, leading to a showdown over the Comstock Act.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A &#8216;showdown&#8217; of sort is happening over abortion laws, and it could lead to a Supreme Court battle\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/81ff4ca810d98b0b5b376a640452d9e6\",\"name\":\"Carole Novielli\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/df095be9fa34b48e50413a07102ab289?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/df095be9fa34b48e50413a07102ab289?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Carole Novielli\"},\"description\":\"Carole Novielli has over thirty years of research experience on abortion, Planned Parenthood and eugenics. Her work has been published by many reputable media outlets. As a woman opposed to abortion, Carole is a committed Christian who refuses to be silenced by the main stream media and the nation's pro-abortion feminist minority.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/CaroleNovielli\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/carole\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A 'showdown' of sort is happening over abortion laws, and it could lead to a Supreme Court battle","description":"Shield laws enacted in pro-abortion states are usurping laws in states with pro-life laws, leading to a showdown over the Comstock Act.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A 'showdown' of sort is happening over abortion laws, and it could lead to a Supreme Court battle","og_description":"Shield laws enacted in pro-abortion states are usurping laws in states with pro-life laws, leading to a showdown over the Comstock Act.","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2024-10-27T15:47:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-10-25T21:26:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":650,"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/GettyImages-1212435862-abortion-pill.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Carole Novielli","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/CaroleNovielli","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Carole Novielli","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/"},"author":{"name":"Carole Novielli","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/81ff4ca810d98b0b5b376a640452d9e6"},"headline":"A &#8216;showdown&#8217; of sort is happening over abortion laws, and it could lead to a Supreme Court battle","datePublished":"2024-10-27T15:47:46+00:00","dateModified":"2024-10-25T21:26:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/"},"wordCount":2114,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Abortion Pill","Activism"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/","name":"A 'showdown' of sort is happening over abortion laws, and it could lead to a Supreme Court battle","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-10-27T15:47:46+00:00","dateModified":"2024-10-25T21:26:34+00:00","description":"Shield laws enacted in pro-abortion states are usurping laws in states with pro-life laws, leading to a showdown over the Comstock Act.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/showdown-abortion-laws-supreme-court-battle-comstock\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A &#8216;showdown&#8217; of sort is happening over abortion laws, and it could lead to a Supreme Court battle"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/81ff4ca810d98b0b5b376a640452d9e6","name":"Carole Novielli","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/df095be9fa34b48e50413a07102ab289?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/df095be9fa34b48e50413a07102ab289?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Carole Novielli"},"description":"Carole Novielli has over thirty years of research experience on abortion, Planned Parenthood and eugenics. Her work has been published by many reputable media outlets. As a woman opposed to abortion, Carole is a committed Christian who refuses to be silenced by the main stream media and the nation's pro-abortion feminist minority.","sameAs":["https:\/\/twitter.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/CaroleNovielli"],"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/carole\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/320114"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/303"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=320114"}],"version-history":[{"count":51,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/320114\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":320827,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/320114\/revisions\/320827"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/296704"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=320114"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=320114"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=320114"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}