{"id":316535,"date":"2024-08-02T12:46:14","date_gmt":"2024-08-02T17:46:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/news\/?p=316535"},"modified":"2024-08-02T11:50:43","modified_gmt":"2024-08-02T16:50:43","slug":"self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/","title":{"rendered":"Self-managed abortions are rising&#8230; and Big Abortion is gaslighting the public"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><p>A new <a href=\"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/fullarticle\/2821654?utm_source=For_The_Media&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=ftm_links&amp;utm_term=073024\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">study<\/a> making the media rounds suggests that &#8220;self-managed&#8221; abortions (SMA) have risen 40% since the Supreme Court overturned <em>Roe v. Wade<\/em> in its 2022 decision in <em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women&#8217;s Health Organization<\/em>. If accurate, then the abortion industry has achieved increased &#8220;self-managed&#8221; abortions \u2014 which is exactly what it has wanted for over a decade.<\/p>\n<p>Though there is a direct line between the abortion industry&#8217;s efforts to expand abortion access and the increased use of at-home abortion methods, the results of the study are being dishonestly used to <em>attack<\/em> <em>pro-life laws as dangerous<\/em>, as if they are the cause of the increase in self-managed abortion.<\/p>\n<p>But the truth is that the abortion industry has been <em>intentionally<\/em> attempting to expand self-managed abortion for years.<\/p>\n<p>The new study was authored by researchers affiliated with pro-abortion groups: the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), and the Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>The gaslighting of the masses<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Once <em>Roe<\/em> fell, the gaslighting began. After well over a decade of pushing for at-home, self-managed abortions, the abortion industry was handed two &#8216;gifts,&#8217; so to speak. The first was the Covid-19 pandemic, which created an excuse to allow abortion to take place in the home. (It might seem unfair or shocking to say the pandemic was a gift to the abortion industry, but an industry insider once <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/founder-911-saving-abortion-pill\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">said the same of the horrific events on September 11, 2001<\/a>). The second &#8216;gift&#8217; was the fall of <em>Roe<\/em>, which allowed newly enacted pro-life laws to become the industry&#8217;s scapegoat when the number of at-home abortions began to rise \u2014 likely along with the number of abortion-related <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/police-investigating-death-28-week-baby-abortion-pill\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">complications<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Though it is abortion supporters who are selling the abortion pill online, advocating for states and <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/abortion-pill-startup-stockpile-pregnant\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">women<\/a> to <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/states-stockpile-abortion-pills-violate-fda-safety\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">stockpile<\/a> abortion drugs, and attempting to hide the fact that studies have shown that six percent (6%) of women who took the abortion pill required emergency care, the abortion industry&#8217;s allies in the media are ensuring that Americans blame pro-life laws enacted since the fall of <em>Roe<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Case in point: <\/strong><em>this study<\/em> on the &#8216;negative effects&#8217; of self-managed abortion was carried out by <em>researchers <strong>affiliated with the<\/strong><\/em><strong> <em>same pro-abortion groups<\/em><\/strong> behind previous studies <strong><em>in support <\/em><\/strong>of self-managed abortion.<\/p>\n<p>These groups <em>wanted<\/em> self-managed abortions to expand, despite the known risks to women. They got what they wanted during the pandemic, and then they blamed any negative consequences on pro-life laws.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, their friends in the media appear willing to aid in the gaslighting. The Associated Press <a href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/abortion-pills-mifepristone-ending-pregnancy-783bea83469d1632cde4e51819f191f5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">reported<\/a> on the new study by saying, &#8220;A growing number of women said they\u2019ve tried to end their pregnancies on their own by doing things like taking herbs, drinking alcohol or even hitting themselves in the belly, a new study suggests.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It <em>completely ignored<\/em> that a major method of self-managed abortion in the study was the <em><strong>approved, no-test, at-home abortion drugs heavily promoted by the same groups<\/strong><\/em> now blaming &#8220;self-managed&#8221; abortions on pro-lifers.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s take a look at that study.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Methods of and reasons for at-home abortion<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>The Hill <a href=\"https:\/\/thehill.com\/policy\/healthcare\/4800173-self-managed-abortions-up-since-dobbs-decision-study\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">reported<\/a> about the study: &#8220;Significantly more women chose to end pregnancies themselves \u2014 using <em><strong>unsupervised and potentially dangerous at-home methods<\/strong><\/em> \u2014 in the year following the Supreme Court&#8217;s abolition of federal protections for abortion&#8230;&#8221; (emphasis added).<\/p>\n<p>The findings of the study were <a href=\"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/fullarticle\/2821654?utm_source=For_The_Media&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=ftm_links&amp;utm_term=073024\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">published<\/a> on Tuesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network Open. It found that when comparing two different cohorts of women \u2014 the first from December 2021 and January 2022 and the second from June and July 2023 \u2014 the number of women of reproductive age reporting &#8220;<em>ever<\/em> having a self-managed abortion increased from 2.4% to 3.3%&#8221; (emphasis added).<\/p>\n<p>This should not be surprising, since great efforts were made among the abortion industry and its allies to increase the number of self-managed abortions.<\/p>\n<p>The study found that the most common methods of SMA after <em>Dobbs<\/em> were 1) the use of emergency contraception before confirming pregnancy (and a different method <em>after<\/em> confirming pregnancy), 2) herbs, and 3) the use of mifepristone and\/or misoprostol.<\/p>\n<p>Eliminating emergency contraception (since another method of SMA was used but not specified by researchers) puts &#8220;herbs&#8221; and &#8220;mifepristone and\/or misoprostol&#8221; at the top of the list of <a href=\"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/fullarticle\/2821654?utm_source=For_The_Media&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=ftm_links&amp;utm_term=073024\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">primary methods of SMA<\/a>\u00a0in 2023. However, while the use of herbs decreased from 2021 to 2023, the use of mifepristone and\/or misoprostol <em>increased<\/em>. Other methods such as &#8220;Hit in the stomach,&#8221; &#8220;Taking a hot bath or shower,&#8221; and &#8220;Lifting heavy objects&#8221; as methods of self-managed abortion also decreased.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_316539\" style=\"width: 710px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-316539\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-316539\" src=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Screenshot-2024-07-31-at-8.27.59\u202fPM-700x342.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"700\" height=\"342\" srcset=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Screenshot-2024-07-31-at-8.27.59\u202fPM-700x342.png 700w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Screenshot-2024-07-31-at-8.27.59\u202fPM-300x147.png 300w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Screenshot-2024-07-31-at-8.27.59\u202fPM-768x376.png 768w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Screenshot-2024-07-31-at-8.27.59\u202fPM-1536x751.png 1536w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Screenshot-2024-07-31-at-8.27.59\u202fPM-2048x1002.png 2048w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Screenshot-2024-07-31-at-8.27.59\u202fPM-500x245.png 500w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-316539\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Via JAMA<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The study also revealed women&#8217;s &#8220;most frequently cited reasons&#8221; for using self-managed abortion, including being &#8220;early in pregnancy&#8221; (33.3% in 2021 and 31.8% in 2023), and a desire for privacy (30.4% in 2021 and 32.2% in 2023). In addition, nearly one in five women said &#8220;the clinic was too expensive&#8221; (16.7% in 2021 and 18.2% in 2023) or they wanted to try a DIY abortion before going to an abortion facility (20.8% in 2021 and 19.1% in 2023).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Only 5.9% of women cited &#8220;Abortion is illegal&#8221; (in other words, <em>pro-life laws<\/em>) as their reason for choosing self-managed abortion in 2023.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"YouTube video player\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/gnEHZiud8dg?si=wlxMmE8Jy78XIBgO\" width=\"640\" height=\"355\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><span data-mce-type=\"bookmark\" style=\"display: inline-block; width: 0px; overflow: hidden; line-height: 0;\" class=\"mce_SELRES_start\">\ufeff<\/span><\/iframe><\/p>\n<h3><strong>An abortion industry &#8216;win&#8217;, over a decade in the making<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>The findings of this study reveal that the abortion industry is achieving a goal it set years before <em>Roe v. Wade<\/em> was even on the chopping block.<\/p>\n<p>As <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortion-brainchild-abortion-industry\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">reported<\/a> by Live Action Research Fellow Carole Novielli, &#8220;&#8216;self-managed&#8217; abortion basically involves no medical professional and by definition leaves women alone to &#8216;manage&#8217; whether their abortions are complete (without retained tissue), whether they are bleeding too much (hemorrhage), or whether they are experiencing a potential emergency.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Novielli found that between May 2009 and February 2011 \u2014 <em><strong>yes, 15 years ago<\/strong><\/em> \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/archive\/NCT00994734\/2009_10_13\">clinical trials<\/a> \u201cto assess the acceptability of home-use mifepristone\u201d were sponsored by Gynuity Health Projects to expand access to the abortion pill. In 2015, Gynuity announced clinical trials for direct-to-consumer telemedicine abortion \u2014 also known as &#8220;mail order&#8221; abortion pills \u2014\u00a0through businesses like Planned Parenthood. Then in 2016, the pro-abortion Obama administration <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-fda-commissioner-expanded-abortion-pill-obama\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">weakened the Food and Drug Administration\u2019s (FDA) REMS<\/a>\u00a0safety regulations by\u00a0<em>removing<\/em> the requirement that women take the first drug in the abortion pill regimen (mifepristone) in front of a clinician, in-person at the location of a certified prescriber. That year, a TelAbortion trial also began, and in 2017, the <a href=\"https:\/\/tarahealthfoundation.org\/about-us\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tara Health Foundation<\/a> (which <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/abortion-pill-california-college-campuses\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">pledged<\/a> to fund the abortion pill on college campuses in California) published a <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20190625185253\/https:\/\/tarahealthfoundation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/RHIA_InvestmentCase.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">92-page strategy<\/a> that included \u201cself-managed\u201d abortion.<\/p>\n<p>The pro-abortion efforts to expand &#8220;self-managed&#8221; abortion continued into 2018, during which a consortium of pro-abortion groups \u2014 ANSIRH (which is part of this most recent study), Gynuity, and Ibis Reproductive Health \u2014 published a <a href=\"https:\/\/ibisreproductivehealth.org\/sites\/default\/files\/files\/publications\/US%20research%20roadmap%20self%20managed%20abortion.pdf\">report<\/a> that stated, <b>\u201c<\/b>[M]edication abortion could be even further demedicalized through pharmacy dispensing and expansion of telemedicine models \u2014 <strong>or even making it available over the counter (OTC)<\/strong> \u2014 which have the potential to expand access greatly\u201d (emphasis added).<\/p>\n<h3><strong>The &#8220;no-test&#8221; abortion pill protocol<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>A <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/fda-abortion-pill-medical-supervision\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2018 report<\/a> from the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute revealed that the intent of abortion expansion efforts would include the &#8220;no-test&#8221; protocol for the abortion pill. The report explained:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><em>To fully integrate self-managed medication abortion with existing abortion practices in the United States, <strong>misoprostol and mifepristone must first become available without a prescription<\/strong>\u2026. Lifting the REMS on mifepristone would allow more convenient models to emerge in states that permit telemedicine abortion\u2026. lifting the REMS on mifepristone <strong>and securing OTC status for medication abortion<\/strong> are advances that do not depend on state legislatures or the Supreme Court.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s recap: Planned Parenthood&#8217;s former &#8220;special affiliate,&#8221; the Guttmacher Institute, recommended <strong>in 2018<\/strong> making the abortion pill regimen available <em>without a prescription and over the counter<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>The so-called \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/gynuity.org\/resources\/no-test-medication-abortion-a-sample-protocol-for-increasing-access-during-a-pandemic-and-beyond\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">no-test<\/a>\u201d abortion pill\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20200420152641\/https:\/\/gynuity.org\/assets\/resources\/No-test-MA-Protocol-and-Instructions.pdf\">protocol<\/a>\u00a0was helped along in 2020 by the Covid-19 pandemic. Abortion businesses were given permission to <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/alarming-abortion-pill-ultrasounds-guess\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">skip all testing<\/a> that once ensured that women met the criteria for taking the abortion pill \u2014 including all lab work and ultrasounds \u2014 so that women could continue to have abortions under Covid social distancing restrictions. Not testing women to determine gestational age or a possible ectopic pregnancy puts them at greater risk of abortion pill-related complications, but that didn&#8217;t matter to abortion allies.<\/p>\n<p>By 2021, the Biden administration had <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/fda-letter-permits-abortion-pill-by-mail-during-the-covid-19\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">approved<\/a> abortion pill distribution <em>by mail<\/em> during the pandemic and expanded the REMS safety regulations to allow for mail-order pharmacy distribution. It later allowed the abortion pill to be shipped by mail <em>even after<\/em> the pandemic had ended.<\/p>\n<p>At-home, no-test, self-managed abortion was here to stay well before the end of <em>Roe<\/em>, all pushed and promoted and applauded by abortion supporters.<\/p>\n<p>But abortion industry insiders weren&#8217;t done.<\/p>\n<p>At the end of 2021, the pandemic quickly fading in the rearview mirror, <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/former-employees-accuse-abortion-organization-racism\/\">former NARAL board member<\/a> Renee Bracey Sherman penned an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thenation.com\/article\/society\/fda-abortion-pill\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">op-ed<\/a> along with abortionist and UCSF professor Daniel Grossman (a co-author of this study) in which they, too, <em>advocated for over-the-counter sales of the abortion pill<\/em>. And in a whiplash narrative switch, advocates of abortion began <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/illegal-abortion-safe-claim-abortion-advocates\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">claiming<\/a> that <em>\u201cillegal\u201d abortion could be \u201csafe.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>In 2022, a <a href=\"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamainternalmedicine\/fullarticle\/2790319?widget=personalizedcontent&amp;previousarticle=0\">study<\/a> out of UCSF doubled down on that claim. It was unsurprisingly authored by four abortionists, an affiliate of Gynuity, and three researchers associated with UCSF (an abortion training facility with over 100 training programs).<\/p>\n<p>As Live Action researcher Bettina di Fiore <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/four-reasons-distrust-ucsf-abortion-pill-study\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">explained<\/a>, &#8220;Every single author on this [2022 UCSF] study has a vested interest in promoting abortion, either by virtue of their direct participation therein, or consequent to their financial ties to pro-abortion organizations. Every single author on this study is biased in favor of abortion.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><em>So<\/em> biased, in fact, that they shrugged their shoulders at the understanding that some women could likely die as a result. Concerning ectopic pregnancy, they wrote (emphasis added):<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><i>In this study, the ectopic pregnancy rate of 2 per 1000 suggests that the screening procedures used by the participating clinics will not triage all patients with ectopic risks to ultrasonography before the abortion.\u00a0However, <strong>the potential benefits of expanded access, increased convenience, and earlier treatment conferred by removing testing requirements may outweigh potential risks of delayed identification of ectopic pregnancies<\/strong>.\u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n<p>In other words, explained di Fiore, &#8220;They are literally suggesting that the nearly 1,000 annual <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/irish-woman-undiagnosed-ectopic-pregnancy-abortion-pill\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ectopic pregnancies<\/a> that would go undiagnosed if the no-test protocol became standard \u2014 every one of which would be potentially fatal \u2014 might be an acceptable sacrifice if it means they can expand abortion.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The bottom line is this: Any negative consequences of at-home, no-test, self-managed abortion pill use lie squarely at the feet of the abortion industry and its media allies, who continue to gaslight the public into believing otherwise.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/actnow.io\/ARQQhk1\"><b><i>The DOJ put a pro-life grandmother in jail for protesting the killing of preborn children. Please take 30-seconds to TELL CONGRESS: STOP THE DOJ FROM TARGETING PRO-LIFE AMERICANS.<\/i><\/b><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A new study making the media rounds suggests that &#8220;self-managed&#8221; abortions (SMA) have risen 40% since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in its 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women&#8217;s Health Organization. If accurate, then the abortion industry has achieved increased &#8220;self-managed&#8221; abortions \u2014 which is exactly what it has wanted for over [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":62,"featured_media":316607,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[15,3],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Self-managed abortions are rising... and Big Abortion is gaslighting the public<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A study on &#039;negative effects&#039; of self-managed abortion was done by researchers from the same abortion groups that did studies to promote it.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Self-managed abortions are rising... and Big Abortion is gaslighting the public\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A study on &#039;negative effects&#039; of self-managed abortion was done by researchers from the same abortion groups that did studies to promote it.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-08-02T17:46:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-08-02T16:50:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/GettyImages-2107845319-abortion-pill.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"650\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Nancy Flanders\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Nancy Flanders\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Nancy Flanders\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef\"},\"headline\":\"Self-managed abortions are rising&#8230; and Big Abortion is gaslighting the public\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-02T17:46:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-02T16:50:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/\"},\"wordCount\":1761,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Analysis\",\"Opinion\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/\",\"name\":\"Self-managed abortions are rising... and Big Abortion is gaslighting the public\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-02T17:46:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-02T16:50:43+00:00\",\"description\":\"A study on 'negative effects' of self-managed abortion was done by researchers from the same abortion groups that did studies to promote it.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Self-managed abortions are rising&#8230; and Big Abortion is gaslighting the public\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef\",\"name\":\"Nancy Flanders\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Nancy Flanders\"},\"description\":\"Nancy Flanders is Associate Editor for Live Action News. She has 25 years of experience writing and editing. For more than a decade, she has focused her work on pro-life issues through human interest stories and political issues regarding abortion and physician-assisted death as well as research articles and op-eds dismantling the lies of the pro-abortion, pro-death agenda. Her work has appeared in Catholic Digest, Pregnancy Help News, and a variety of other publications.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/nancy\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Self-managed abortions are rising... and Big Abortion is gaslighting the public","description":"A study on 'negative effects' of self-managed abortion was done by researchers from the same abortion groups that did studies to promote it.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Self-managed abortions are rising... and Big Abortion is gaslighting the public","og_description":"A study on 'negative effects' of self-managed abortion was done by researchers from the same abortion groups that did studies to promote it.","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2024-08-02T17:46:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-08-02T16:50:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":650,"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/GettyImages-2107845319-abortion-pill.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Nancy Flanders","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@liveaction","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Nancy Flanders","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/"},"author":{"name":"Nancy Flanders","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef"},"headline":"Self-managed abortions are rising&#8230; and Big Abortion is gaslighting the public","datePublished":"2024-08-02T17:46:14+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-02T16:50:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/"},"wordCount":1761,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Analysis","Opinion"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/","name":"Self-managed abortions are rising... and Big Abortion is gaslighting the public","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-08-02T17:46:14+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-02T16:50:43+00:00","description":"A study on 'negative effects' of self-managed abortion was done by researchers from the same abortion groups that did studies to promote it.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/self-managed-abortions-rising-gaslighting-public\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Self-managed abortions are rising&#8230; and Big Abortion is gaslighting the public"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef","name":"Nancy Flanders","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Nancy Flanders"},"description":"Nancy Flanders is Associate Editor for Live Action News. She has 25 years of experience writing and editing. For more than a decade, she has focused her work on pro-life issues through human interest stories and political issues regarding abortion and physician-assisted death as well as research articles and op-eds dismantling the lies of the pro-abortion, pro-death agenda. Her work has appeared in Catholic Digest, Pregnancy Help News, and a variety of other publications.","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/nancy\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316535"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/62"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=316535"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316535\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":316629,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316535\/revisions\/316629"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/316607"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=316535"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=316535"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=316535"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}