{"id":315137,"date":"2024-07-05T14:42:21","date_gmt":"2024-07-05T19:42:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/news\/?p=315137"},"modified":"2024-07-09T13:56:50","modified_gmt":"2024-07-09T18:56:50","slug":"biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/","title":{"rendered":"Is Biden’s HHS pushing propaganda about ’emergency abortions’? You be the judge."},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court sent Moyle v. United States<\/a><\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0Idaho v. United States<\/a><\/em> back to a lower court, reinstating an injunction on Idaho’s Defense of Life Act. This means that should an “emergency abortion” become absolutely necessary to protect a pregnant woman in any of the very narrow possible circumstances where Idaho’s law conflicts with the federal EMTALA rules, doctors in Idaho must provide that “emergency abortion” as a “stabilizing treatment.” A press release quote from Idaho AG Ra\u00fal Labrador noted<\/a>:<\/p>\n

The Biden administration\u2019s concession that EMTALA will rarely override Idaho\u2019s law<\/strong> caused the Supreme Court to ask the 9th Circuit for review in light of the federal government\u2019s change in position. Justice Barrett wrote, those concessions mean that Idaho\u2019s Defense of Life Act \u2018remains almost entirely intact.\u2019<\/strong> The 9th Circuit\u2019s decision should be easy. As Justice Alito explained well: the Biden administration\u2019s \u2018preemption theory is plainly unsound.\u2019<\/em><\/p>\n

And yet, after the decision, the Biden HHS issued a letter, telling<\/a> emergency room doctors that they must commit abortions on women in emergencies, as if the administration didn’t already concede to the Court that EMTALA would rarely override Idaho’s law. So, is the Biden administration simply trying to pretend 1) that Idaho’s law is not<\/em> left “almost entirely intact,” and 2) as if doctors in pro-life states aren’t already<\/em> legally allowed to do so-called “emergency abortions”?<\/p>\n

You be the judge.<\/p>\n

Is induced abortion ever the standard of care?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

In a letter to doctor and hospital associations obtained by the Associated Press, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Director Chiquita Brooks-LaSure told them they have a legal obligation to commit abortions as a stabilizing treatment during emergencies.<\/p>\n

\u201cNo pregnant woman or her family should have to even begin to worry that she could be denied the treatment she needs to stabilize her emergency medical condition in the emergency room,\u201d the letter said. “And yet, we have heard story after story describing the experiences of pregnant women presenting to hospital emergency departments with emergency medical conditions and being turned away because medical providers were uncertain about what treatment they were permitted to provide.\u201d<\/p>\n

Here’s the thing<\/strong>: induced abortion is not the standard of care<\/em> for pregnancy emergencies. Not PPROM<\/a>, not preeclampsia<\/a>, not placenta accreta<\/a>, not placenta percreta<\/a>, not placenta increta<\/a>, not placenta previa<\/a>, and so on (see more information at links provided). While some of these conditions may warrant early delivery<\/em> of the baby, this is not remotely the same as intentionally killing<\/em> the preborn child. Nowhere is induced abortion listed as a treatment for any of these conditions. Therefore, if induced abortion is not<\/strong> the standard of care<\/em> for pregnancy complications or conditions, then why wouldn’t a medical provider provide whatever is<\/strong> the standard of care for such conditions<\/em>?<\/p>\n

While induced abortion \u2014 the direct and intentional<\/em> killing of a preborn human being \u2014 is not medically necessary to end a pregnancy and save the mother’s life, state pro-life laws provide exceptions for abortion in emergency situations. When a pregnancy must end (such as in the case of ectopic pregnancy), doctors can provide women with appropriate treatment, whether that be surgery to remove the fallopian tube and embryo during an ectopic pregnancy (which if untreated will be fatal to the mother), or preterm delivery of the child in other circumstances. With these procedures, the unintended death of the child may result \u2014 but this is fundamentally different from intentionally<\/em> killing the child when it is unnecessary to do so.<\/p>\n

“Completely baseless”<\/strong><\/h3>\n

The Associated Press stated<\/a> (emphasis added):<\/p>\n

But enforcement in Texas, the country\u2019s most populous state with a strict six-week abortion ban<\/a><\/span>, will still be on hold because of a lower court ruling.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

The letter is the Biden administration\u2019s latest attempt to raise awareness about a 40-year-old federal law<\/a><\/span> that requires almost all emergency rooms \u2014 any that receive Medicare dollars \u2014 to provide stabilizing treatment for patients in a medical emergency. When hospitals turn away patients or refuse to provide that care,<\/a><\/span> they are subject to federal investigations, hefty fines and loss of Medicare funding.<\/em><\/p>\n

The Texas Alliance for Life responded to the Biden HHS letter in a press release<\/a>, saying that the Biden administration “falsely suggests that Idaho and other state pro-life laws fail to protect women facing life-threatening emergencies during pregnancy.”<\/p>\n

It continued, “This is untrue. All state pro-life laws provide an abortion exception for those rare but tragic circumstances in which a pregnancy poses a threat to a mother’s life, including circumstances when death is not imminent. Those include Texas and Idaho.”<\/p>\n

Regardless, the Biden administration’s assertions that doctors in pro-life states are turning away pregnant women in emergency situations are inaccurate, and Texas has the statistics to prove it.<\/p>\n

Texas Alliance for Life released<\/a> the latest Texas Health and Human Services Commission report on “life-saving abortions each month since Dobbs” in the state. The report showed that from January 2022 through June 24, 2022, the day Roe v. Wade<\/em> was overturned, there were 14 abortions carried out for “medical-necessity (life\/health) exceptions” in Texas. That’s an average of 2.6 a month. After the fall of Roe<\/em> and the enactment of the state’s Human Life Protection Act on August 25, 2022, the state shows an average of 4.8 such abortions each month, from September 2022 through February 2024.<\/p>\n

“Texas’ laws are saving unborn babies from abortion and protecting women’s lives in rare and tragic cases when pregnancy endangers their lives or health,” said Amy O’Donnell, Texas Alliance for Life’s Communications Director. “The latest reports show claims by critics and naysayers to the contrary are completely baseless.”<\/p>\n

Texas Alliance for Life noted that no doctor has faced prosecution, been sanctioned by the Texas Medical Board, or been sued by the Attorney General for these emergency procedures. In addition, no pregnant woman has lost her life because of the state’s pro-life laws.<\/p>\n

“The Texas Supreme Court, in\u00a0Texas v. Zurawski<\/a>,<\/i>\u00a0recently\u00a0determined<\/a>\u00a0that the Texas Human Life Protection Act, which protects unborn babies from abortion with an exception for abortions when ‘a woman has a life-threatening physical condition that places her at risk of death or serious physical impairment unless an abortion is performed,’ is both constitutional and clear,” said the pro-life group in a press release. “Physicians may use ‘reasonable medical judgment’ to determine whether a pregnancy requires a medically necessary abortion. The Court emphasized that the law does not require a physician to wait until a woman’s life is in imminent danger before performing a life-saving abortion.”<\/p>\n

The DOJ put a pro-life grandmother in jail for protesting the killing of preborn children. Please take 30-seconds to TELL CONGRESS: STOP THE DOJ FROM TARGETING PRO-LIFE AMERICANS.<\/i><\/b><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court sent Moyle v. United States\u00a0and\u00a0Idaho v. United States back to a lower court, reinstating an injunction on Idaho’s Defense of Life Act. This means that should an “emergency abortion” become absolutely necessary to protect a pregnant woman in any of the very narrow possible circumstances where Idaho’s law conflicts […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":62,"featured_media":284667,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[15,9459],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nIs Biden's HHS pushing propaganda about 'emergency abortions'? You be the judge.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Is the Biden HHS pretending ID's law isn't "almost entirely intact" and that docs in pro-life states aren't allowed to do emergency abortions?\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Is Biden's HHS pushing propaganda about 'emergency abortions'? You be the judge.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Is the Biden HHS pretending ID's law isn't "almost entirely intact" and that docs in pro-life states aren't allowed to do emergency abortions?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-05T19:42:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-09T18:56:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/GettyImages-1407563506-Biden-Becerra.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"650\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Nancy Flanders\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Nancy Flanders\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Nancy Flanders\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef\"},\"headline\":\"Is Biden’s HHS pushing propaganda about ’emergency abortions’? You be the judge.\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-05T19:42:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-09T18:56:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/\"},\"wordCount\":1124,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Analysis\",\"Top Story on Homepage\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/\",\"name\":\"Is Biden's HHS pushing propaganda about 'emergency abortions'? You be the judge.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-05T19:42:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-09T18:56:50+00:00\",\"description\":\"Is the Biden HHS pretending ID's law isn't \\\"almost entirely intact\\\" and that docs in pro-life states aren't allowed to do emergency abortions?\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Is Biden’s HHS pushing propaganda about ’emergency abortions’? You be the judge.\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef\",\"name\":\"Nancy Flanders\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Nancy Flanders\"},\"description\":\"Nancy Flanders is Associate Editor for Live Action News. She has 25 years of experience writing and editing. For more than a decade, she has focused her work on pro-life issues through human interest stories and political issues regarding abortion and physician-assisted death as well as research articles and op-eds dismantling the lies of the pro-abortion, pro-death agenda. Her work has appeared in Catholic Digest, Pregnancy Help News, and a variety of other publications.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/nancy\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Is Biden's HHS pushing propaganda about 'emergency abortions'? You be the judge.","description":"Is the Biden HHS pretending ID's law isn't \"almost entirely intact\" and that docs in pro-life states aren't allowed to do emergency abortions?","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Is Biden's HHS pushing propaganda about 'emergency abortions'? You be the judge.","og_description":"Is the Biden HHS pretending ID's law isn't \"almost entirely intact\" and that docs in pro-life states aren't allowed to do emergency abortions?","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2024-07-05T19:42:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-09T18:56:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":650,"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/GettyImages-1407563506-Biden-Becerra.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Nancy Flanders","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@liveaction","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Nancy Flanders","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/"},"author":{"name":"Nancy Flanders","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef"},"headline":"Is Biden’s HHS pushing propaganda about ’emergency abortions’? You be the judge.","datePublished":"2024-07-05T19:42:21+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-09T18:56:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/"},"wordCount":1124,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Analysis","Top Story on Homepage"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/","name":"Is Biden's HHS pushing propaganda about 'emergency abortions'? You be the judge.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-07-05T19:42:21+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-09T18:56:50+00:00","description":"Is the Biden HHS pretending ID's law isn't \"almost entirely intact\" and that docs in pro-life states aren't allowed to do emergency abortions?","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/biden-hhs-propaganda-emergency-abortions-judge\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Is Biden’s HHS pushing propaganda about ’emergency abortions’? You be the judge."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef","name":"Nancy Flanders","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Nancy Flanders"},"description":"Nancy Flanders is Associate Editor for Live Action News. She has 25 years of experience writing and editing. For more than a decade, she has focused her work on pro-life issues through human interest stories and political issues regarding abortion and physician-assisted death as well as research articles and op-eds dismantling the lies of the pro-abortion, pro-death agenda. Her work has appeared in Catholic Digest, Pregnancy Help News, and a variety of other publications.","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/nancy\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315137"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/62"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=315137"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315137\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":315251,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315137\/revisions\/315251"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/284667"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=315137"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=315137"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=315137"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}