{"id":313953,"date":"2024-06-14T16:43:42","date_gmt":"2024-06-14T21:43:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/news\/?p=313953"},"modified":"2024-09-20T16:01:38","modified_gmt":"2024-09-20T21:01:38","slug":"debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/","title":{"rendered":"DEBUNKED: Report claims to prove pro-life laws enable domestic violence. It doesn’t."},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

On June 3, the National Domestic Violence Hotline and the pro-abortion legal advocacy group <\/span>If\/When\/How<\/span><\/a> published a <\/span>Reproductive Coercion and Abuse Report<\/span><\/a>. It details the results of a survey conducted on the National Domestic Violence Hotline\u2019s website between October and December of 2023, in which 3,431 anonymous individuals participated.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The report\u2019s authors claim that it demonstrates that \u201creproductive coercion is\u2026 enabled by state restrictions on reproductive healthcare.\u201d Similarly, HuffPost <\/span>claimed<\/span><\/a> that the report \u201chighlights the connection between abortion access and intimate partner violence since the Supreme Court repealed federal abortion protections two years ago.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

In reality, the report fails to achieve either<\/em> of those things and is actually just more pseudoscience crafted for the sole purpose of advancing a pro-abortion agenda.<\/span><\/p>\n

Location, location, location<\/b><\/p>\n

Significant state-level legal restrictions on abortion were not possible prior to the Supreme Court\u2019s ruling in <\/span>Dobbs v. Jackson Women\u2019s Health Organization<\/span><\/i>, which overturned\u00a0Roe v. Wade<\/em><\/span> in June of 2022. Over the course of the approximately two years since that decision, <\/span>many states<\/span><\/a> have enacted significant legal protections for preborn children.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

However, nowhere in this report’s extensive laundry list of sundry statistics related to what the authors term \u201creproductive coercion and abuse\u201d are any data provided regarding the home states of survey respondents; it doesn\u2019t provide any information regarding the actual legal status of abortion in respondents\u2019 home states, or even the respondents\u2019 perceptions of what their local abortion-related laws might be. <\/span><\/p>\n

In fact, the researchers state, \u201cAll responses were anonymous, and we collected no identifying information,\u201d although they did collect demographic data on ethnicity and sexual orientation. They additionally claimed the survey was “national,” yet it was online, potentially allowing for users outside the United States to answer as well. The researchers gave almost no information at all about their methodology, and do not mention how they selected participants (or even whether respondents were subjected to any<\/i>\u00a0kind of screening whatsoever).<\/span><\/p>\n

Ultimately, this report fails to connect the experiences of respondents, many of which are admittedly tragic, to the abortion-related state laws which are supposedly applicable to those respondents.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

In other words, it shows <\/span>no correlation whatsoever<\/span><\/i> between \u201creproductive coercion and abuse\u201d and state-level legal protections for preborn children. For all we know, every person who responded to this survey could be living in states like California, which has enacted extensive legislation designed to promote and protect abortion.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Outside of time<\/b><\/p>\n

What\u2019s more, although the report has what might be considered an impressive collection of statistics collected during a post-<\/span>Dobbs<\/span><\/i> period \u2014 a period in which many states did, in fact, have pro-life legal protections in place \u2014 it doesn\u2019t even attempt to compare those numbers to a pre-<\/strong><\/span>Dobbs<\/i><\/strong> period<\/strong>. Consequently, it fails to show that <\/span>Dobbs<\/span><\/i> and\/or specific pro-life laws had any impact of any kind on the statistics it reports.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The authors claim to prove that state-level pro-life laws sanction \u201creproductive coercion.\u201d But because the report fails to show any kind of change in the prevalence of \u201creproductive coercion\u201d since <\/span>Dobbs<\/span><\/i>, this claim is roughly akin to saying, \u201cDuring the Covid lockdowns, 54% of women reported making attempts to get pregnant. Obviously, lockdowns increased women\u2019s desire for children.\u201d But without telling us the rate of attempted pregnancy <\/span>prior to<\/span><\/i> or <\/span>following<\/span><\/i> the lockdowns, claiming lockdowns had any effect on women\u2019s desire to become pregnant <\/span>is completely nonsensical, because it is unsupported by the available evidence. <\/span><\/p>\n

Likewise, due to an absence of comparison data, this report\u2019s claim to demonstrate that pro-life state laws \u201cenable\u201d anything that might be termed \u201creproductive coercion\u201d fall completely flat.<\/span><\/p>\n

Exacerbating this problem is the fact that the incidents reported by survey respondents were not temporally limited in any way \u2013 they could have happened before <\/span>Dobbs<\/span><\/i>, after <\/span>Dobbs<\/span><\/i>, or even prior to <\/span>Roe v. Wade<\/span><\/i>. At least one anecdote quoted in the report happened over 20 years ago<\/strong><\/em>, according to the respondent\u2019s own words.<\/span><\/p>\n

Misrepresenting its own data<\/b><\/p>\n

Many of the report\u2019s statistics have absolutely nothing to do with pro-life laws, or even with abortion. Of those that do, the numbers would seem to indicate that it is more common for women to be pressured or forced into having an abortion than it is for them to be dissuaded or prevented from doing so.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The report states that \u201c13% of respondents said their current or former partner pressured or forced them to terminate a pregnancy,\u201d and that \u201c13% of respondents said their current or former partner used or threatened violence while they were pregnant, with the intention of ending the pregnancy.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

By contrast, according to the report, \u201c7% said their current or former partner prevented them from using medication abortion [the abortion pill] to have an abortion,\u201d and \u201c9% of the respondents said their current or former partner used or threatened violence if they wanted to or were trying to terminate a pregnancy.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

So, by its own data, the report shows that it is more common<\/em> for abusive partners to <\/span>push <\/span><\/i>or even<\/span> violently force <\/span><\/i>abortion upon women than it is for them to <\/span>interfere<\/span><\/i> with it.<\/span><\/p>\n

Likewise, the percentage of survey respondents reporting anti-abortion coercion (between 7% and 9%, depending on specific circumstances) was significantly lower than the percentage of post-abortive women who have reported feeling pressured or coerced into having an abortion in other research. <\/span>One recent study<\/span><\/a> places this number at 61%; <\/span>other research<\/span><\/a> has placed it as high as 64%.<\/span><\/p>\n

Furthermore, although the report urges that \u201c[s]tates must repeal abortion restrictions,\u201d it also reports that 12% of respondents experienced situations in which their past abortions were used against them in some way by abusive partners. It would seem that making abortion more readily available would be anything but helpful to women in that particular situation \u2013 yet the report offers no recommendations whatsoever for protecting these women.<\/span><\/p>\n

There is only one conclusion supported by the evidence provided<\/b><\/p>\n

This report is an abject failure when it comes to proving its own claims. However, there <\/span>is<\/span><\/i> one valid conclusion that can be drawn from the evidence it provides: abusers are deviously creative and will employ a variety of methods to mistreat their partners. There are men who employ abuse and control in order to force their partners to abort. And there are men who employ abuse and control in order to prevent their partners from aborting.<\/span><\/p>\n

Report authors claim abusers can use pro-life laws to further their abuse \u2014 but <\/span>overwhelming<\/span><\/a> evidence<\/span><\/a> demonstrates that abusers often <\/span>use abortion itself<\/span><\/a> to further their abuse. In the end, abusers are going to abuse \u2013 one way or another. The core difference is, when the law protects preborn children, these innocent third parties are less likely to be murdered as a result of that abuse.<\/span><\/p>\n

In the end, only abusers themselves are to blame for the<\/span> coercion and abuse they commit \u2014 circumstances, legal or otherwise, cannot be justly faulted as the cause of abusers’ actions. Promoting the idea that some outside factor is somehow responsible for an abuser\u2019s actions essentially excuses perpetrators from culpability \u2013 and thereby denies justice to victims.<\/span><\/p>\n

The DOJ put a pro-life grandmother in jail for protesting the killing of preborn children. Please take 30-seconds to TELL CONGRESS: STOP THE DOJ FROM TARGETING PRO-LIFE AMERICANS.<\/i><\/b><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On June 3, the National Domestic Violence Hotline and the pro-abortion legal advocacy group If\/When\/How published a Reproductive Coercion and Abuse Report. It details the results of a survey conducted on the National Domestic Violence Hotline\u2019s website between October and December of 2023, in which 3,431 anonymous individuals participated.\u00a0 The report\u2019s authors claim that it […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":788,"featured_media":187918,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[15,20722],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nDEBUNKED: Report claims to prove pro-life laws enable domestic violence. It doesn't.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The locations of respondents aren't specified, it doesn't compare its data to pre-Dobbs data, and it seems to show the opposite of its claim.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"DEBUNKED: Report claims to prove pro-life laws enable domestic violence. It doesn't.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The locations of respondents aren't specified, it doesn't compare its data to pre-Dobbs data, and it seems to show the opposite of its claim.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-06-14T21:43:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-09-20T21:01:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/shutterstock_261573011-coerce-angry-violence-3.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"650\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bettina di Fiore\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bettina di Fiore\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bettina di Fiore\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/189f8a60121ec1992ae74917a7134f0f\"},\"headline\":\"DEBUNKED: Report claims to prove pro-life laws enable domestic violence. It doesn’t.\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-06-14T21:43:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-20T21:01:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/\"},\"wordCount\":1209,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Analysis\",\"Fact Checks\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/\",\"name\":\"DEBUNKED: Report claims to prove pro-life laws enable domestic violence. It doesn't.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-06-14T21:43:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-20T21:01:38+00:00\",\"description\":\"The locations of respondents aren't specified, it doesn't compare its data to pre-Dobbs data, and it seems to show the opposite of its claim.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"DEBUNKED: Report claims to prove pro-life laws enable domestic violence. It doesn’t.\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/189f8a60121ec1992ae74917a7134f0f\",\"name\":\"Bettina di Fiore\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3e31061bd16493d73f3e184e7dfec4d3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3e31061bd16493d73f3e184e7dfec4d3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bettina di Fiore\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/bettina-di-fiore\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"DEBUNKED: Report claims to prove pro-life laws enable domestic violence. It doesn't.","description":"The locations of respondents aren't specified, it doesn't compare its data to pre-Dobbs data, and it seems to show the opposite of its claim.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"DEBUNKED: Report claims to prove pro-life laws enable domestic violence. It doesn't.","og_description":"The locations of respondents aren't specified, it doesn't compare its data to pre-Dobbs data, and it seems to show the opposite of its claim.","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2024-06-14T21:43:42+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-09-20T21:01:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":650,"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/shutterstock_261573011-coerce-angry-violence-3.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bettina di Fiore","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@liveaction","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bettina di Fiore","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/"},"author":{"name":"Bettina di Fiore","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/189f8a60121ec1992ae74917a7134f0f"},"headline":"DEBUNKED: Report claims to prove pro-life laws enable domestic violence. It doesn’t.","datePublished":"2024-06-14T21:43:42+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-20T21:01:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/"},"wordCount":1209,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Analysis","Fact Checks"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/","name":"DEBUNKED: Report claims to prove pro-life laws enable domestic violence. It doesn't.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-06-14T21:43:42+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-20T21:01:38+00:00","description":"The locations of respondents aren't specified, it doesn't compare its data to pre-Dobbs data, and it seems to show the opposite of its claim.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-report-pro-life-laws-domestic-violence\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"DEBUNKED: Report claims to prove pro-life laws enable domestic violence. It doesn’t."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/189f8a60121ec1992ae74917a7134f0f","name":"Bettina di Fiore","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3e31061bd16493d73f3e184e7dfec4d3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3e31061bd16493d73f3e184e7dfec4d3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Bettina di Fiore"},"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/bettina-di-fiore\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313953"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/788"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=313953"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313953\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":313989,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313953\/revisions\/313989"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/187918"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=313953"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=313953"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=313953"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}