{"id":313311,"date":"2024-06-05T14:44:08","date_gmt":"2024-06-05T19:44:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/news\/?p=313311"},"modified":"2024-09-20T16:01:43","modified_gmt":"2024-09-20T21:01:43","slug":"debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/","title":{"rendered":"Debunked: Scientific American article falsely claims pro-life laws hurt women"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A recent <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/abortion-restrictions-are-spreading-even-though-science-shows-theyre-harmful\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Scientific American article<\/span><\/a> echoes the<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> false idea that pro-life laws harm women and that scientific fact backs this up. However, Scientific American&#8217;s arguments rest on shaky ground \u2014 not scientific evidence. The main source of the author\u2019s claims is the flawed data of the Turnaway Study, which has been <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/turnaway-study-takedown-video-debunks-denied-abortion\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">discredited<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> numerous times by Live Action and other reputable organizations.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>What is the Turnaway Study?<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Launched in 2008 by Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), a collaborative research group at the University of California San Francisco, the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ansirh.org\/research\/ongoing\/turnaway-study\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Turnaway Study<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> examined the effects of unwanted pregnancy on women. Researchers sought to gather data from nearly 1000 women seeking abortions across 30 facilities in the United States. The study compared the experiences of women who underwent abortions with those who were \u201cturned away\u201d due to being too far along in their pregnancies.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The researchers claimed there were no adverse effects on women&#8217;s health from abortion, and noted significant consequences of carrying unwanted pregnancies to term, such as economic hardship, increased likelihood of remaining in abusive relationships, and pregnancy-related health issues like preeclampsia. The study concluded that abortion does not harm the health and well-being of women, and has been cited by media outlets as proof of this assertion.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, several glaring issues undermine the credibility of the Turnaway Study. First and foremost, its sample size of 877 women and short duration of just five years raise concerns about the study&#8217;s ability to provide comprehensive insights into the long-term consequences of abortion. Moreover, although thousands of women were initially recruited for the study, only 37% ultimately agreed to participate and, by the final year, participation rates had declined to a mere 17%, making it impossible to ascertain the impact of abortion on the majority of women followed by the researchers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The study also failed to account for the quarter of women turned away who sought abortions elsewhere or experienced miscarriages, and it did not differentiate between women undergoing multiple abortions and those having only one. Moreover, the study <em>excluded<\/em> women who had never sought out or undergone an abortion, further skewing the findings.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Worst of all, the study&#8217;s association with pro-abortion organizations and biases among its researchers raise questions about its objectivity. Diana Greene Foster, the study\u2019s principal investigator, has ties to organizations advocating for abortion, and the study received funding from pro-abortion groups. Additionally, the study&#8217;s methodology included hand-picking participants instead of selecting them at random. Many, if not all, of the women participating in the study were strongly pro-abortion.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>READ: <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/poll-many-pro-choice-favor-limits-abortion\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>New poll results reaffirm that many \u2018pro-choice\u2019 Americans want significant limits on abortion<\/em><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Scientific American interviewed Foster, exposing even more gaps in the study&#8217;s findings. <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Thousands of women have been hurt by abortion, and their <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/fran-abortion-placate-boyfriend-left-anyway\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">stories<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> are heartbreaking.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Link between abortion and depression<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">During the Scientific American interview, Foster explained that the impetus for the Turnaway Study was \u201cthe then common belief that getting an abortion caused depression&#8230;&#8221; She claimed there is no evidence of a relationship between the two.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, numerous studies support the idea that there is a connection between abortion and mental health issues. For instance:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/journals\/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry\/article\/abortion-and-mental-health-quantitative-synthesis-and-analysis-of-research-published-19952009\/E8D556AAE1C1D2F0F8B060B28BEE6C3D\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">British Journal of Psychiatry<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> reported an 81% increased risk of mental health problems among women who had abortions.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A study in the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jpands.org\/vol22no4\/coleman.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> found that 67.5% of respondents sought help from mental health professionals post-abortion.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Research by the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/lozierinstitute.org\/study-abortion-in-first-pregnancy-linked-to-much-higher-use-of-mental-health-services\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Charlotte Lozier Institute<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> revealed that post-abortive women required outpatient mental health treatment more frequently than those whose first pregnancy ended in birth.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1660-4601\/18\/4\/2179\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> indicated that abortion heightens the risk of postpartum mental health issues in subsequent pregnancies carried to term.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">These findings are reinforced by numerous accounts of women grappling with depression and other mental health challenges after abortion. Foster&#8217;s denial of this link dismisses the struggles of women like Tenysha Onyia, an 18-year-old who never imagined having unprotected sex with her older boyfriend would result in an unplanned pregnancy. As Live Action News previously <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/pressured-abort-struggled-pain-abortion-pill-regret\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">reported<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, Onyia was pressured into taking the abortion pill by her boyfriend and described the chemical abortion process as \u201ca horrific experience.\u201d Afterwards, she sank into depression.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cI wasn\u2019t the same person any longer,\u201d Onyia said. \u201cIt was too big of a burden to carry myself. I went through a lot of emotions and thought I was going crazy. I begged my sister to take me to a mental hospital.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Research published by <a href=\"https:\/\/bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12888-023-05278-7\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BMC Psychiatry<\/a> found that post-abortive depression is a \u201ccommon problem for all women of reproductive age.\u201d Thousands of women tragically suffer from depression and other mental health issues after abortion, often lacking comprehensive support and acknowledgment of their experiences. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Foster\u2019s assertion that depression and abortion aren\u2019t connected represents just another denial of this reality.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Abortion: The \u201ceasier\u201d route\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">During the Scientific American interview, one of the first questions posed to Foster concerned how many of the women turned away from abortion pursued adoption instead.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Foster&#8217;s response was startling. She remarked, \u201cCarrying a pregnancy to term and surrendering a child is not at all easy. It\u2019s often taken for granted by people who think that the solution to abortion is adoption; they overlook how difficult that is.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Foster&#8217;s assertion is fundamentally flawed. Pro-lifers do not underestimate the challenges of adoption, and they are deeply committed to supporting both mother and child. Pro-life pregnancy resource centers, for instance, provide <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/boston-pregnancy-center-supported-family-beyond\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">care and resources<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> to assist women with immediate and ongoing needs related to unexpected pregnancy. In fact, data from 2019 <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/lozierinstitute.org\/fact-sheet-pregnancy-centers-serving-women-and-saving-lives-2020\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">shows<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> that pro-life pregnancy centers served close to 2 million people, offering services and material assistance with a total value exceeding $266 million.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The reason pro-lifers advocate for adoption isn&#8217;t because they are ignorant of its challenges. It&#8217;s because the alternative \u2014 ending a life \u2014 is morally unacceptable.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">What\u2019s the answer? It is not to make killing preborn children easier, as Foster demands. It is advocating for better support for mothers during and after their pregnancies, and making adoption a more feasible option if the biological mother is unable to parent.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">And pro-life advocates are doing just that. Earlier this year, they pushed back against a New York state <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-discourage-adoption-incentivizing-surrogacy-abortion\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">rule<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> that limits the financial support adoptive parents can give birth mothers, essentially making it easier to abort children than adopt them.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although there are no official statistics available on the number of couples waiting to adopt in the U.S., experts estimate that the figure could be as high as two million at any given time, as reported by <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/adoptionnetwork.com\/adoption-myths-facts\/domestic-us-statistics\/#:~:text=There%20are%20no%20national%20statistics,one%20and%20two%20million%20couples.\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Adoption Network<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Choosing adoption is an incredibly difficult decision, but in the end, it upholds the preborn child\u2019s right to life. It&#8217;s crucial to establish systems that support women, regardless of whether they choose adoption or parenting. Both options are valid and deserving of support, rather than resorting to ending a life.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Better to never have been born?<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In examining the social and financial consequences of abortion denial, Foster claimed that research has shown that \u201cthe kids born of pregnancies where the mom was denied [compared with children whose parent didn\u2019t request an abortion] had worse outcomes for 35 years.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">While Foster acknowledged that research is a bit outdated, she continued to stand by the view that there are \u201cworse outcomes,\u201d namely economic insecurity, for children born to mothers who were denied an abortion.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Not only is this finding flawed, but it also sends the message that the lives of those in poverty aren\u2019t as valuable as those who experience financial security \u2014 that it is better to be dead, never having been born, than poor.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Apart from biases, design flaws, and the limited sample size, the Turnaway Study also overlooks the complexities surrounding late-term abortion decisions. Many women in these circumstances may be <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/contrary-to-popular-belief-late-term-abortions-arent-always-done-for-medical-reasons\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">grappling<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> with relationship changes or financial hardships, which the study fails to adequately consider. Additionally, it doesn&#8217;t account for the possibility that financial struggles among women in the turn-away group may have predated their consideration of abortion.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As Live Action News <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/abortion-advocates-debunked-study-denied-poverty\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">previously reported<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, the study found that women who were denied abortions had an average credit score of 550, while those who underwent the procedure had a score of 558. The marginal difference between the credit scores of these two groups does <strong>not<\/strong> sufficiently support the claim that denying women abortions drastically impacts their socioeconomic status.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>What\u2019s next?<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the Scientific American article, Foster was clear that it is too soon to assess the full impact of the overturning of <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe v. Wade<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> resulting from the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in <em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women&#8217;s Health Organization<\/em>.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Despite this landmark decision and the significant pro-life laws implemented by many states, women continue to seek abortions, particularly with the widespread availability of the abortion pill.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Currently, Foster is leading a new study examining the aftermath of the end of <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe v. Wade<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Initial findings suggest that in states with pro-life laws protecting preborn children from abortion, women are still obtaining abortions, though experiencing a delay of approximately one week.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As new findings emerge, it&#8217;s crucial to scrutinize them carefully. The Turnaway Study, despite its significant flaws, has unduly influenced public discourse on the effects of abortion denial. Now more than ever, it&#8217;s imperative to prioritize factual data over perpetuating misinformation from flawed studies like this one.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/actnow.io\/ARQQhk1\"><b><i>The DOJ put a pro-life grandmother in jail for protesting the killing of preborn children. Please take 30-seconds to TELL CONGRESS: STOP THE DOJ FROM TARGETING PRO-LIFE AMERICANS<\/i><\/b><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A recent Scientific American article echoes the false idea that pro-life laws harm women and that scientific fact backs this up. However, Scientific American&#8217;s arguments rest on shaky ground \u2014 not scientific evidence. The main source of the author\u2019s claims is the flawed data of the Turnaway Study, which has been discredited numerous times by [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":809,"featured_media":186256,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[15,20722],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Debunked: Scientific American article falsely claims pro-life laws hurt women<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A recent Scientific American article relies on faulty information as it echoes the false idea that pro-life laws harm women.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Debunked: Scientific American article falsely claims pro-life laws hurt women\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A recent Scientific American article relies on faulty information as it echoes the false idea that pro-life laws harm women.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-06-05T19:44:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-09-20T21:01:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/mom-and-baby-pexels.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"650\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Amanda Vicinanzo\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Amanda Vicinanzo\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Amanda Vicinanzo\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/eebffe0c2940568619d29cdb3e4c08db\"},\"headline\":\"Debunked: Scientific American article falsely claims pro-life laws hurt women\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-06-05T19:44:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-20T21:01:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/\"},\"wordCount\":1576,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Analysis\",\"Fact Checks\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/\",\"name\":\"Debunked: Scientific American article falsely claims pro-life laws hurt women\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-06-05T19:44:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-20T21:01:43+00:00\",\"description\":\"A recent Scientific American article relies on faulty information as it echoes the false idea that pro-life laws harm women.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Debunked: Scientific American article falsely claims pro-life laws hurt women\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/eebffe0c2940568619d29cdb3e4c08db\",\"name\":\"Amanda Vicinanzo\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287abbaa56cf8c0e49355295f5ce392d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287abbaa56cf8c0e49355295f5ce392d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Amanda Vicinanzo\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/amanda-vicinanzo\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Debunked: Scientific American article falsely claims pro-life laws hurt women","description":"A recent Scientific American article relies on faulty information as it echoes the false idea that pro-life laws harm women.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Debunked: Scientific American article falsely claims pro-life laws hurt women","og_description":"A recent Scientific American article relies on faulty information as it echoes the false idea that pro-life laws harm women.","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2024-06-05T19:44:08+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-09-20T21:01:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":650,"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/mom-and-baby-pexels.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Amanda Vicinanzo","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@liveaction","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Amanda Vicinanzo","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/"},"author":{"name":"Amanda Vicinanzo","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/eebffe0c2940568619d29cdb3e4c08db"},"headline":"Debunked: Scientific American article falsely claims pro-life laws hurt women","datePublished":"2024-06-05T19:44:08+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-20T21:01:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/"},"wordCount":1576,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Analysis","Fact Checks"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/","name":"Debunked: Scientific American article falsely claims pro-life laws hurt women","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-06-05T19:44:08+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-20T21:01:43+00:00","description":"A recent Scientific American article relies on faulty information as it echoes the false idea that pro-life laws harm women.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/debunked-scientific-american-pro-life-laws\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Debunked: Scientific American article falsely claims pro-life laws hurt women"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/eebffe0c2940568619d29cdb3e4c08db","name":"Amanda Vicinanzo","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287abbaa56cf8c0e49355295f5ce392d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/287abbaa56cf8c0e49355295f5ce392d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Amanda Vicinanzo"},"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/amanda-vicinanzo\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313311"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/809"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=313311"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313311\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":313392,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313311\/revisions\/313392"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/186256"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=313311"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=313311"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=313311"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}