{"id":310431,"date":"2024-04-17T14:46:02","date_gmt":"2024-04-17T19:46:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/news\/?p=310431"},"modified":"2024-04-17T10:20:20","modified_gmt":"2024-04-17T15:20:20","slug":"exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Could ‘exceptions’ to protecting all preborn children destroy every pro-life law?"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

If a recent Indiana appeals court decision<\/a> is any indication, there’s a major weakness plaguing the pro-life movement and attempting to demolish the life-saving work accomplished since the overturning of Roe v. Wade<\/em>. It’s been lying under the foundation of the pro-life argument like a fault line for decades, and it could reduce the pro-life standpoint to ashes. As is made evident in the highly unusual Indiana ruling discussed below, pro-life “exceptions” are the Achilles heel that could destroy pro-life laws.<\/p>\n

What the court said<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Indiana appeals court ruled earlier this month that Indiana’s pro-life law protecting most children from abortion violates the religious rights of a group of five women, along with Hoosier Jews for Choice, under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.<\/p>\n

The court ruled that because the state allows exceptions for rape, incest, and fetal anomaly in the pro-life law, its argued “compelling interest” in protecting preborn lives is not compelling at all. In other words, it says if the state isn’t interested in protecting all<\/strong> preborn human beings from abortion, then it cannot argue that it has a compelling interest in protecting any<\/strong> preborn human beings. Notably, however, it appears the court’s ruling also refers to existing, living human beings in the womb as “potential for life” and “potential life.”<\/p>\n

The ruling says:<\/p>\n

The State has not shown that its claimed compelling interest in protecting the potential for life is satisfied by denying Plaintiffs\u2019 religious-based exception that prioritizes a mother\u2019s health over potential life, given that other exceptions are allowed based on the same prioritization\u2014that is, the exceptions applicable when the pregnancy poses a \u201cserious health risk\u201d or termination would \u201csave the pregnant woman\u2019s life.\u201d [. . .]<\/em><\/p>\n

This weakness in the State\u2019s argument is even more apparent when the Abortion Law\u2019s other exceptions are considered. […]<\/em><\/p>\n

The Abortion Law also allows abortions when the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest or when the fetus has been diagnosed with a lethal fetal anomaly so long as other statutory conditions are met. […] The State does not explain why a victim of rape or incest is entitled to an abortion, but women whose sincere religious beliefs direct an abortion are not. The State also does not explain how allowing an abortion of a \u201cfetus diagnosed with a lethal fetal anomaly\u201d\u2014as is conditionally permitted by the Abortion Law\u2014advances the State\u2019s alleged compelling interest in protecting potential life.<\/em><\/p>\n

Because Indiana legislators allowed some “exceptions” to the pro-life law, the court ruled the state must also allow religious<\/em> exceptions as a justifiable reason<\/em> for killing a preborn child.<\/p>\n

But there is no justifiable reason<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Pro-life exceptions are immoral<\/strong><\/p>\n

A 2023 Gallup poll<\/a> revealed that 44% of Americans identify as “pro-life” in the abortion debate. But just 13%<\/em><\/strong> said abortion should be illegal in “all” circumstances.<\/strong><\/em> Fifty-one percent said abortion should be legal under “certain” circumstances, and breaking it down even further, 36% said abortion should be legal “only in a few” circumstances.<\/p>\n

It is a serious flaw in the pro-life movement that 44% of Americans consider themselves to be pro-life yet only 13% think abortion should be outlawed, calling into question what, exactly, they believe abortion to be and what they believe a preborn human is.<\/p>\n

Either a preborn child is a human being or he isn’t. And either abortion is morally wrong or it isn’t. There is no middle ground.<\/p>\n

It can’t be immoral to abort a baby for being “unplanned” but moral to abort a baby for being “unhealthy.” It is considered unacceptable for a doctor to provide medical care to only healthy (born) children while offering to kill a (born) child when she becomes ill. Yet that’s exactly what’s being done to children in the womb. They aren’t “potential” life. They’re alive and growing.<\/p>\n

Exceptions that allow abortions only for certain<\/em> children (rape, incest, fetal anomaly) create the implication that pro-life laws are not about protecting children, but about punishing women. If a woman is pregnant from rape, the pregnancy is not her “fault,” and if her baby has a serious health diagnosis, it is likely not her “fault” either. This makes it appear as though pro-life legislators are only interested in protecting the babies of women who are experiencing unplanned pregnancies by their own “fault.”<\/p>\n

Leaving the legality of abortion up to state legislators has the same effect \u2014 the protection of only some<\/em> preborn children.<\/p>\n

\u201cA lot of people think [abortion is] murder,\u201d said<\/a> pro-abortion advocate Bill Maher last week. \u201cThat\u2019s why I don\u2019t understand the 15-week thing, or Trump\u2019s plan is, \u2018Let\u2019s leave it to the states.\u2019 You mean, so killing babies is OK in some states? I can respect the absolutist position. I really<\/strong><\/em> ca<\/strong>n.<\/strong>” (emphasis added)<\/p>\n

It’s a horrific misjudgment of the pro-life movement that any<\/em> preborn child could be deemed an exception to laws meant to protect<\/em> preborn children. They are always human beings worthy of protection \u2014 not just when it’s convenient.<\/p>\n

The Indiana court ruling has shown that pro-lifers must stop cowering to the pro-abortion side. The only moral and justifiable pro-life position is the position of pro-life, no exceptions<\/em>.<\/p>\n

The DOJ put a pro-life grandmother in jail for protesting the killing of preborn children. Please take 30-seconds to TELL CONGRESS: STOP THE DOJ FROM TARGETING PRO-LIFE AMERICANS.<\/i><\/b><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

If a recent Indiana appeals court decision is any indication, there’s a major weakness plaguing the pro-life movement and attempting to demolish the life-saving work accomplished since the overturning of Roe v. Wade. It’s been lying under the foundation of the pro-life argument like a fault line for decades, and it could reduce the pro-life […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":62,"featured_media":209364,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[15,3473,3],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nCould 'exceptions' to protecting all preborn children destroy every pro-life law?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Either a preborn child is a human being or he isn't. It can't be immoral to abort an "unplanned" baby yet moral to abort an "unhealthy" one.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Could 'exceptions' to protecting all preborn children destroy every pro-life law?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Either a preborn child is a human being or he isn't. It can't be immoral to abort an "unplanned" baby yet moral to abort an "unhealthy" one.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-04-17T19:46:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-04-17T15:20:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/GettyImages-539550463-fetus-preborn-baby.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"576\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Nancy Flanders\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Nancy Flanders\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Nancy Flanders\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef\"},\"headline\":\"Could ‘exceptions’ to protecting all preborn children destroy every pro-life law?\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-04-17T19:46:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-04-17T15:20:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/\"},\"wordCount\":890,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Analysis\",\"Newsbreak\",\"Opinion\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/\",\"name\":\"Could 'exceptions' to protecting all preborn children destroy every pro-life law?\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-04-17T19:46:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-04-17T15:20:20+00:00\",\"description\":\"Either a preborn child is a human being or he isn't. It can't be immoral to abort an \\\"unplanned\\\" baby yet moral to abort an \\\"unhealthy\\\" one.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Could ‘exceptions’ to protecting all preborn children destroy every pro-life law?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef\",\"name\":\"Nancy Flanders\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Nancy Flanders\"},\"description\":\"Nancy Flanders is Associate Editor for Live Action News. She has 25 years of experience writing and editing. For more than a decade, she has focused her work on pro-life issues through human interest stories and political issues regarding abortion and physician-assisted death as well as research articles and op-eds dismantling the lies of the pro-abortion, pro-death agenda. Her work has appeared in Catholic Digest, Pregnancy Help News, and a variety of other publications.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/nancy\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Could 'exceptions' to protecting all preborn children destroy every pro-life law?","description":"Either a preborn child is a human being or he isn't. It can't be immoral to abort an \"unplanned\" baby yet moral to abort an \"unhealthy\" one.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Could 'exceptions' to protecting all preborn children destroy every pro-life law?","og_description":"Either a preborn child is a human being or he isn't. It can't be immoral to abort an \"unplanned\" baby yet moral to abort an \"unhealthy\" one.","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2024-04-17T19:46:02+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-04-17T15:20:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":576,"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/GettyImages-539550463-fetus-preborn-baby.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Nancy Flanders","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@liveaction","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Nancy Flanders","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/"},"author":{"name":"Nancy Flanders","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef"},"headline":"Could ‘exceptions’ to protecting all preborn children destroy every pro-life law?","datePublished":"2024-04-17T19:46:02+00:00","dateModified":"2024-04-17T15:20:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/"},"wordCount":890,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Analysis","Newsbreak","Opinion"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/","name":"Could 'exceptions' to protecting all preborn children destroy every pro-life law?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-04-17T19:46:02+00:00","dateModified":"2024-04-17T15:20:20+00:00","description":"Either a preborn child is a human being or he isn't. It can't be immoral to abort an \"unplanned\" baby yet moral to abort an \"unhealthy\" one.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/exceptions-protecting-preborn-destroy-pro-life-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Could ‘exceptions’ to protecting all preborn children destroy every pro-life law?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef","name":"Nancy Flanders","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Nancy Flanders"},"description":"Nancy Flanders is Associate Editor for Live Action News. She has 25 years of experience writing and editing. For more than a decade, she has focused her work on pro-life issues through human interest stories and political issues regarding abortion and physician-assisted death as well as research articles and op-eds dismantling the lies of the pro-abortion, pro-death agenda. Her work has appeared in Catholic Digest, Pregnancy Help News, and a variety of other publications.","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/nancy\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310431"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/62"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=310431"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310431\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":310519,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310431\/revisions\/310519"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/209364"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=310431"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=310431"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=310431"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}