{"id":288851,"date":"2023-04-12T08:37:36","date_gmt":"2023-04-12T13:37:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/news\/?p=288851"},"modified":"2023-04-13T11:40:21","modified_gmt":"2023-04-13T16:40:21","slug":"claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/","title":{"rendered":"Claim of bias in Texas abortion pill lawsuit overshadowed by bias in abortion pill studies"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><p>The abortion industry has\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/DrDGrossman\/status\/1645492486461362176\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">claimed<\/a>\u00a0that\u00a0District Court Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk was \u201cbiased\u201d in rendering his <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/district-court-judge-revoke-fda-abortion-pill\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">decision<\/a>\u00a0to overturn the Food and Drug Administration\u2019s (FDA) approval of mifepristone (Mifeprex), known as the abortion pill. The judge, industry profiteers claim,\u00a0also refused to consider\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-york-times-overlooks-facts-abortion-pill\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">hundreds of studies<\/a>\u00a0that they claim \u201cprove\u201d the abortion pill is safe.<\/p>\n<p>But what &#8216;Big Abortion&#8217; conveniently leaves out is the extraordinary bias of those studies.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Amarillo Division, issued its ruling Friday in the case,\u00a0<em>Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.<\/em>\u00a0In it, the court allowed the Biden administration seven days to seek review from appellate courts. Danco Laboratories, the pharmaceutical company that manufactures chemical abortion drugs, also filed an emergency motion to stay at the 5th Circuit Monday,&#8221; Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which represented the plaintiffs in the case,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/adfmedia.org\/case\/alliance-hippocratic-medicine-v-us-food-and-drug-administration\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">wrote<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>An\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/adfmedialegalfiles.blob.core.windows.net\/files\/AHM-DOJ-EmergencyMotionForStay.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">emergency motion<\/a>\u00a0was also filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) asking the appeals court to stay a federal district court\u2019s\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/adfmedia.org\/press-release\/court-halts-fdas-unlawful-approval-chemical-abortion-drugs\">ruling<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Bias in abortion pill studies<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Live Action News has\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/tangled-web-money-deception-abortion-pill\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">documented<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/bad-actors-money-trail-abortion-pill-corruption\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">multiple times<\/a>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Clinical trial sponsors were pro-abortion, many funded by abortion pill investors.<\/li>\n<li>Clinical trial locations were pro-abortion, funded by abortion philanthropists and some by abortion pill investors.<\/li>\n<li>Abortion pill studies often funded by pro-abortion philanthropists, some who were also abortion pill investors.<\/li>\n<li>Abortion pill studies were often published in pro-abortion journals.<\/li>\n<li>Multiple authors of abortion pill studies were on the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-abortion-experts-payroll-manufacturers\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">payroll<\/a>\u00a0of Danco or GBP, with some in leadership of organizations that were funded by Danco.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The abortion industry points to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) to confirm the veracity of their studies, but ACOG is stridently\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/american-college-obstetricians-gynecologists-pro-abortion\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">pro-abortion<\/a>\u00a0and is\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ibisreproductivehealth.org\/sites\/default\/files\/files\/publications\/Ibis%202016%20990.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">funded<\/a>\u00a0by radical abortion organizations, including Ibis Reproductive Health (<a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20200130190128\/https:\/\/ibisreproductivehealth.org\/funders\">funded<\/a>\u00a0by U.S. abortion pill manufacturer Danco Laboratories)\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ibisreproductivehealth.org\/funders\">and by<\/a>\u00a0the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, a Danco investor.<\/p>\n<p>The ACOG recently\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.grantmakers.io\/profiles\/v0\/476032365-susan-thompson-buffett-foundation\/?query=American%20College%20of%20Obstetrics\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">received<\/a>\u00a0$1.4 million from the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation (Warren Buffett) \u2014 funder of many pro-abortion efforts worldwide \u2014 and has received hundreds of thousands from the foundation every year for\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/990s.foundationcenter.org\/990pf_pdf_archive\/476\/476032365\/476032365_201612_990PF.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">several<\/a>\u00a0years. The Buffett Foundation was also one of the first\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/study-funded-abortion-pill-investor-buffett-foundation\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">investors<\/a>\u00a0in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/secrecy-abortion-pill-maker-investors\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Danco<\/a>. ACOG itself has\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/intranet.bixbycenter.ucsf.edu\/publications\/files\/BixbyCenter_10YearReport_2009.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">funded<\/a>\u00a0the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/paying-millions-abortion-training-taxpayers\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health<\/a>, where abortionists are trained.<\/p>\n<p>The fact is that, not only was the FDA extremely secretive in their review of studies around the abortion pill but they are alleged to have\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/fda-hiding-names-experts-reviewed-abortion-pill\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">hidden the names of the researchers<\/a>\u00a0who reviewed them for the FDA.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/walgreens-cvs-petition\/\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-283198\" src=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Keep-Abortion-Pill-Out-Of-Walgreens-CVSLAN-Horizontal--700x180.jpg\" alt=\"Walgreens CVS banner\" width=\"700\" height=\"180\" srcset=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Keep-Abortion-Pill-Out-Of-Walgreens-CVSLAN-Horizontal--700x180.jpg 700w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Keep-Abortion-Pill-Out-Of-Walgreens-CVSLAN-Horizontal--300x77.jpg 300w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Keep-Abortion-Pill-Out-Of-Walgreens-CVSLAN-Horizontal--768x197.jpg 768w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Keep-Abortion-Pill-Out-Of-Walgreens-CVSLAN-Horizontal--500x128.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Eliminating &#8216;adverse event&#8217; reports doesn&#8217;t translate to low adverse events<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Big Abortion is also claiming that\u00a0Judge Kacsmaryk ignored studies which they say concluded that the abortion pill was safe. The pill, approved by the FDA for the termination of pregnancy, has already killed an <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/us-abortion-pill-lives-lost-adverse-obscured\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">estimated<\/a>\u00a05.6 million preborn babies (500K in 2020 alone) since approval in 2000.<\/p>\n<p>Judge Kacsmaryk was clear in his <a href=\"https:\/\/storage.courtlistener.com\/recap\/gov.uscourts.txnd.370067\/gov.uscourts.txnd.370067.137.0_11.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">67-page opinion<\/a> that not only did the plaintiffs have standing in this case (pp. 7-11,\u00a011-13), but plaintiffs\u2019 <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/doctors-fda-abortion-pill-decades-medical-negligence\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">alleged<\/a> injuries are concrete and redressable (pp. 13-17) and within the statutory zone of interests (pp. 16-18).<\/p>\n<p>In addition, Kacsmaryk wrote that the \u201cFDA relied on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System data despite the agency\u2019s 2016 decision to eliminate the requirement for abortionists to report non-fatal \u2018adverse events.\u2019 Defendants maintain that \u2018Plaintiffs offer no explanation for why it was impermissible to rely on the reported data. (pp. 38-39)&#8217;\u201d<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_288916\" style=\"width: 1552px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-288916\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-288916\" src=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/Abortion-pill-lawsuit-from-Texas-on-complication-reporting.jpg\" alt=\"Image: Abortion pill lawsuit from Texas on complication reporting\" width=\"1542\" height=\"750\" srcset=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/Abortion-pill-lawsuit-from-Texas-on-complication-reporting.jpg 1542w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/Abortion-pill-lawsuit-from-Texas-on-complication-reporting-300x146.jpg 300w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/Abortion-pill-lawsuit-from-Texas-on-complication-reporting-768x374.jpg 768w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/Abortion-pill-lawsuit-from-Texas-on-complication-reporting-700x340.jpg 700w, https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/Abortion-pill-lawsuit-from-Texas-on-complication-reporting-500x243.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1542px) 100vw, 1542px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-288916\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Abortion pill lawsuit from Texas on complication reporting<\/p><\/div>\n<p>FDA changes in 2016 permanently removed REMS safety system requirements that abortion pill manufacturers Danco or GenBioPro (GBP) report\u00a0<em>all<\/em>\u00a0adverse events of which they were aware. Instead, the FDA changed the required reporting to <strong>deaths only<\/strong>. And since there has never been a\u00a0<em>federal requirement<\/em>\u00a0that abortion complications be reported, complications of which Danco and GBP were unaware would likely have gone unreported.<\/p>\n<p>Contributing to the underreporting of complications, abortion insiders are\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/bad-actors-conceal-abortion-pill-complications\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">advocating<\/a>\u00a0that women lie when presenting to medical facilities for abortion pill complications, instead claiming they are experiencing a natural miscarriage. In addition, some are even\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/grossman-er-hide-abortion-pill-complications-roe\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">suggesting<\/a>\u00a0that ER doctors <em>falsify documents<\/em> regarding those complications. This further muddies any chance that accurate data on abortion pill complications will be known.<\/p>\n<p>Judge Kacsmaryk seemed aware of these problems, writing, \u201cThe explanation should be obvious\u2014\u00a0<strong>it is circular and self-serving to practically eliminate an \u2018adverse event\u2019 reporting requirement and then point to a low number of &#8216;adverse events&#8217; as a justification for removing even more restrictions than were already omitted in 2000 and 2016<\/strong>. In other words, it is a predetermined conclusion in search of non-data \u2014 a database designed to produce a null set.\u201d (emphasis added)<\/p>\n<div class=\"video-container\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Let me know when the racket of BIG Anti-Abortion supports ending the criminalization of self-managed abortions and pregnancy outcomes, maybe then people wouldn&#39;t have to advise patients to say they&#39;re having a miscarriage on the rare occasion they present at the ER. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/usFs4mjGCh\">https:\/\/t.co\/usFs4mjGCh<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/kxPgP6aNiE\">pic.twitter.com\/kxPgP6aNiE<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Dr. Daniel Grossman (@DrDGrossman) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/DrDGrossman\/status\/1645569813585211392?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">April 10, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/div>\n<p><b>&#8216;Dangerous precedented&#8217;<\/b><strong>\u00a0for Court to interfere with FDA, except when pro-abortion plaintiffs do it<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Big Abortion&#8217; and its media allies have also\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/time.com\/6270389\/abortion-pill-ruling-fda-authority\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">claimed<\/a>\u00a0it is a &#8220;dangerous precedent&#8221; for the Texas District Court to &#8220;interfere&#8221; with an FDA decision over a drug. And while the dishonest pro-abortion media co-sign this claim, they fail to point out that in a competing\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/agportal-s3bucket.s3.amazonaws.com\/uploadedfiles\/Another\/News\/Press_Releases\/Mifepristone%20PI.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">lawsuit,<\/a> filed by pro-abortion politicians in the state of Washington, the plaintiffs requested that the judge\u00a0remove the drug from the FDA&#8217;s REMS safety system.<\/p>\n<p>The lawsuit, filed against the FDA despite <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/fda-retail-pharmacies-abortion-pills-prescription\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">previously granting<\/a> the abortion industry nearly everything it asked for, was co-led by Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson and Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum. It was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.atg.wa.gov\/news\/news-releases\/ag-ferguson-challenges-fda-over-unlawful-unnecessary-restrictions-medication\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">filed<\/a> in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. Nevada, Delaware, Arizona, Illinois, Connecticut, Colorado, Vermont, New Mexico, Michigan and Rhode Island also joined the lawsuit.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This case is about whether it is\u00a0<b>improper and discriminatory for FDA to relegate mifepristone<\/b> \u2014 a medication that has been used over 5 million times with very low rates of complications, very high rates of efficacy, and which is critical to the reproductive rights of the Plaintiff States\u2019 residents, as well as visitors who travel to the Plaintiff States to seek abortion care \u2014 to the very limited class of dangerous drugs that are subject to a REMS,\u201d pro-abortion politicians <a href=\"https:\/\/agportal-s3bucket.s3.amazonaws.com\/uploadedfiles\/Another\/News\/Press_Releases\/Mifepristone%20Complaint.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">wrote<\/a> in their lawsuit (emphasis added).<\/p>\n<p>\u201c&#8230; [B]ecause there is no medical or scientific basis for restricting access to this safe and effective medication via the REMS, FDA\u2019s decision to impose the REMS is arbitrary and capricious\u2026 The 2023 REMS restrictions are not supported by science. Mifepristone is safe and effective, and there is no reasoned scientific basis for subjecting it to additional burdens that are not applied to other, riskier medications\u2026.\u201d the Washington State abortion pill\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/agportal-s3bucket.s3.amazonaws.com\/uploadedfiles\/Another\/News\/Press_Releases\/Mifepristone%20PI.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">lawsuit<\/a> also stated. &#8220;For the foregoing reasons, the Plaintiff States respectfully request that this Court enter an order protecting access to mifepristone by preliminarily enjoining FDA from (1) <strong>enforcing or applying the 2023 REMS<\/strong>, and (2) taking any action to remove mifepristone from the market or otherwise cause the drug to become less available\u2026\u201d (emphasis added)<\/p>\n<p>In other words, pro-abortion politicians petitioned the court to &#8220;interfere&#8221; with FDA decisions, requesting that the court force the FDA to remove the abortion pill mifepristone (Mifeprex) from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/drugs\/drug-safety-and-availability\/risk-evaluation-and-mitigation-strategies-rems\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">REMS<\/a>\u00a0safety regulation system which has been\u00a0kept there under multiple pro-abortion administrations.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"YouTube video player\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/gnEHZiud8dg\" width=\"640\" height=\"355\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><span data-mce-type=\"bookmark\" style=\"display: inline-block; width: 0px; overflow: hidden; line-height: 0;\" class=\"mce_SELRES_start\">\ufeff<\/span><\/iframe>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Judge Rice&#8217;s preliminary injunction v. Judge Kacsmaryk&#8217;s ruling against FDA decision<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Thomas O. Rice was\u00a0appointed to the Eastern District of Washington\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/politics\/live-news\/texas-abortion-pill-mifepristone-ruling\/h_d728673accd7e6e899020a46f97b53e3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">in 2011 by President Barack Obama<\/a>, and according to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2023\/04\/08\/politics\/us-district-judge-thomas-owen-rice-eastern-district-of-washington-abortion\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CNN<\/a> &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/politics\/live-news\/texas-abortion-pill-mifepristone-ruling\/h_d728673accd7e6e899020a46f97b53e3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">previously sided<\/a>\u00a0with an abortion rights group. In 2018, he issued a permanent injunction that blocked the Trump administration from stopping grants to a Planned Parenthood program that funded teen pregnancy prevention programs around the country.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>While Rice has not ruled on all requests in the lawsuit against the FDA&#8217;s REMS, he did grant a preliminary injunction to\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/agportal-s3bucket.s3.amazonaws.com\/uploadedfiles\/Another\/News\/Press_Releases\/80_OrderDenyinginPartMotionPI.pdf\">bar the FDA<\/a>\u00a0from \u201caltering the status quo and rights as it relates to the availability of Mifepristone under the current operative January 2023 Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy under 21 U.S.C. \u00a7 355-1 in Plaintiff States.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>At <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/bench-memos\/rival-rulings-on-fda-approval-of-abortion-drug\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">National Review Online<\/a>, Ed Whelan,\u00a0Distinguished Senior Fellow of the <a href=\"https:\/\/eppc.org\/author\/edward_whelan\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Ethics and Public Policy Center<\/a>, broke down the rival federal district court rulings. &#8220;My initial read is that the rulings don\u2019t conflict and that the Texas ruling would instead render the Washington ruling irrelevant\u2026&#8221; he wrote. Whelan elaborated further on the Washington State case, writing, &#8220;On a quick skim, I\u2019m confused by the lawsuit and the ruling (what do the plaintiff states under Democratic leadership fear that Biden\u2019s FDA might do? is there any real disagreement, or is this a sham suit?), so I will leave it to interested readers to sort out.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Whelan highlighted Judge Kacsmaryk&#8217;s ruling in the Texas lawsuit: &#8220;Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on their challenges to the FDA\u2019s pre-2021 actions (pp. 39-60). The FDA\u2019s 2000 approval violated Subpart H (pp. 39-48), and its pre-2021 actions were arbitrary and capricious (pp. 49-60).&#8221; And &#8220;Plaintiffs face a substantial threat of irreparable harm (pp. 61-63), and a preliminary injunction would serve the public interest (pp. 63-65).&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Live Action News is following these decisions and will update as new information becomes available.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/give.liveaction.org\/general-donation\/?utm_source=lan&amp;utm_medium=display&amp;utm_campaign=monthly&amp;utm_content=article\"><i><strong>Did you know that as little as $10 a month is enough to reach more than 3,000 people with the truth about abortion that no one else is telling them? Click here to start saving lives 365 days a year.<\/strong><\/i><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The abortion industry has\u00a0claimed\u00a0that\u00a0District Court Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk was \u201cbiased\u201d in rendering his decision\u00a0to overturn the Food and Drug Administration\u2019s (FDA) approval of mifepristone (Mifeprex), known as the abortion pill. The judge, industry profiteers claim,\u00a0also refused to consider\u00a0hundreds of studies\u00a0that they claim \u201cprove\u201d the abortion pill is safe. But what &#8216;Big Abortion&#8217; conveniently leaves [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":303,"featured_media":281434,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[9953],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Claim of bias in Texas abortion pill lawsuit overshadowed by bias in abortion pill studies<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Claim of bias in Texas abortion pill lawsuit overshadowed by bias in abortion pill studies\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The abortion industry has\u00a0claimed\u00a0that\u00a0District Court Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk was \u201cbiased\u201d in rendering his decision\u00a0to overturn the Food and Drug Administration\u2019s (FDA) approval of mifepristone (Mifeprex), known as the abortion pill. The judge, industry profiteers claim,\u00a0also refused to consider\u00a0hundreds of studies\u00a0that they claim \u201cprove\u201d the abortion pill is safe. But what &#8216;Big Abortion&#8217; conveniently leaves [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-04-12T13:37:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-04-13T16:40:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/GettyImages-1053768310-texas-court-judge.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Carole Novielli\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/CaroleNovielli\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Carole Novielli\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Carole Novielli\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/81ff4ca810d98b0b5b376a640452d9e6\"},\"headline\":\"Claim of bias in Texas abortion pill lawsuit overshadowed by bias in abortion pill studies\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-04-12T13:37:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-04-13T16:40:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/\"},\"wordCount\":1557,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Abortion Pill\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/\",\"name\":\"Claim of bias in Texas abortion pill lawsuit overshadowed by bias in abortion pill studies\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-04-12T13:37:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-04-13T16:40:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Claim of bias in Texas abortion pill lawsuit overshadowed by bias in abortion pill studies\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/81ff4ca810d98b0b5b376a640452d9e6\",\"name\":\"Carole Novielli\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/df095be9fa34b48e50413a07102ab289?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/df095be9fa34b48e50413a07102ab289?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Carole Novielli\"},\"description\":\"Carole Novielli has over thirty years of research experience on abortion, Planned Parenthood and eugenics. Her work has been published by many reputable media outlets. As a woman opposed to abortion, Carole is a committed Christian who refuses to be silenced by the main stream media and the nation's pro-abortion feminist minority.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/CaroleNovielli\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/carole\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Claim of bias in Texas abortion pill lawsuit overshadowed by bias in abortion pill studies","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Claim of bias in Texas abortion pill lawsuit overshadowed by bias in abortion pill studies","og_description":"The abortion industry has\u00a0claimed\u00a0that\u00a0District Court Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk was \u201cbiased\u201d in rendering his decision\u00a0to overturn the Food and Drug Administration\u2019s (FDA) approval of mifepristone (Mifeprex), known as the abortion pill. The judge, industry profiteers claim,\u00a0also refused to consider\u00a0hundreds of studies\u00a0that they claim \u201cprove\u201d the abortion pill is safe. But what &#8216;Big Abortion&#8217; conveniently leaves [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2023-04-12T13:37:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-04-13T16:40:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":600,"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/GettyImages-1053768310-texas-court-judge.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Carole Novielli","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/CaroleNovielli","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Carole Novielli","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/"},"author":{"name":"Carole Novielli","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/81ff4ca810d98b0b5b376a640452d9e6"},"headline":"Claim of bias in Texas abortion pill lawsuit overshadowed by bias in abortion pill studies","datePublished":"2023-04-12T13:37:36+00:00","dateModified":"2023-04-13T16:40:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/"},"wordCount":1557,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Abortion Pill"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/","name":"Claim of bias in Texas abortion pill lawsuit overshadowed by bias in abortion pill studies","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-04-12T13:37:36+00:00","dateModified":"2023-04-13T16:40:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/claim-bias-texas-abortion-pill-lawsuit-studies\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Claim of bias in Texas abortion pill lawsuit overshadowed by bias in abortion pill studies"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/81ff4ca810d98b0b5b376a640452d9e6","name":"Carole Novielli","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/df095be9fa34b48e50413a07102ab289?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/df095be9fa34b48e50413a07102ab289?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Carole Novielli"},"description":"Carole Novielli has over thirty years of research experience on abortion, Planned Parenthood and eugenics. Her work has been published by many reputable media outlets. As a woman opposed to abortion, Carole is a committed Christian who refuses to be silenced by the main stream media and the nation's pro-abortion feminist minority.","sameAs":["https:\/\/twitter.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/CaroleNovielli"],"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/carole\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/288851"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/303"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=288851"}],"version-history":[{"count":44,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/288851\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":289101,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/288851\/revisions\/289101"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/281434"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=288851"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=288851"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=288851"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}