{"id":270232,"date":"2022-06-22T14:40:33","date_gmt":"2022-06-22T19:40:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/news\/?p=270232"},"modified":"2022-06-21T18:03:40","modified_gmt":"2022-06-21T23:03:40","slug":"government-programs-justify-homicide-human-beings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/government-programs-justify-homicide-human-beings\/","title":{"rendered":"Lack of government programs doesn’t justify the homicide of human beings"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

MSNBC host Ayman Mohyeldin used an AP article on the social programs in pro-life states as a launching pad for his claims<\/a> that states which move to ban or heavily restrict abortion in the event that Roe v. Wade<\/em> is overturned cannot and will not be able to care for the babies who are born within their borders.<\/p>\n

“Red states aren’t prepared for a post-Roe<\/em> baby boom,” he claimed, “if the Supreme Court does in fact overturn Roe v. Wade.<\/em> The red states poised to ban or severely limit abortions already tend to have limited access to health care, they have poor health outcomes, and fewer safety net programs in place for mothers and children. The ensuing increase in births will likely leave families in tough circumstances, in strained systems that are already hanging by a thread in these states.”<\/p>\n

Mohyeldin brought in a Planned Parenthood abortionist, Dr. Bhavik Kumar, to help explain this problem, but Kumar never addressed the issue of helping mothers and babies to get the resources they need. After all, this is the realm of pro-life pregnancy centers, which are currently under attack<\/a> by pro-abortion terrorist groups.<\/p>\n

Instead of advocating for better safety nets, Kumar resorted to the erroneous<\/a> (and frequent) pro-abortion talking point that women will die without abortion access \u2014 and therefore, death is asserted as the solution.<\/p>\n

\u00a0