{"id":258642,"date":"2021-12-10T06:39:33","date_gmt":"2021-12-10T12:39:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/news\/?p=258642"},"modified":"2021-12-14T15:12:01","modified_gmt":"2021-12-14T21:12:01","slug":"time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/","title":{"rendered":"It&#8217;s past time for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe &#8211; and this time, there&#8217;s a good chance they will"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe v. Wade <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">is the U.S. Supreme Court\u2019s last standing defining failure. <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Dobbs v. Jackson Women\u2019s Health<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> places us on the cusp of witnessing Roe\u2019s demise, allowing for true legal protection for all American citizens. For almost 50 years, Americans have been deprived of the ability to protect our youngest brothers and sisters from the violent killing of abortion. <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">contrived that the Constitution provided every woman with a \u201cright to abortion,\u201d a claim that has no basis in the text, history, or traditions of our nation\u2019s governing charter. In the oral arguments held before the Court on December 1st, the fiction of <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">was addressed head-on.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>A Move in the Right Direction\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When the Court agreed to hear <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Dobbs, <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">it chose to address the question, \u201cUnder the Constitution, may a State prohibit elective abortions before viability?\u201d Since <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">was issued in 1973, and the core holding of that case was supported in 1992 in the case of <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Planned Parenthood v. Casey,<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> states have been extremely limited in their ability to pass laws that protect preborn life. States have been particularly restricted from protecting children younger than about 24 weeks, a marker commonly used to delineate if a child is \u201cviable\u201d outside of her mother. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Court\u2019s prohibition to states against passing protective laws has not stopped states from passing laws, in fact, hundreds of laws protecting preborn life have been passed in the last few decades, but unfortunately, these laws have almost never gone into effect. If a state passes a law that the Court says violates their abortion jurisprudence, lower courts will enjoin the law from being enforced. When the Court chose to hear <em>Dobbs<\/em>, Mississippi&#8217;s law protecting children from abortion beginning at 15 weeks gestation had already been put on hold by a lower court. Mississippi&#8217;s Attorney General then requested the Supreme Court hear the case \u2014\u00a0a request made by dozens of states every year which are usually uniformly denied. This request was accepted. <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Why?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The fact that the Court agreed to hear the case in the first place indicates that it is ready to issue a change in abortion-related decisions. If the Court intended to strike down Mississippi&#8217;s law and reaffirm <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe v. Wade<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, it could have accomplished that by refusing to grant the request for a hearing. The Court&#8217;s hearing of the case gives a strong indication that at the very least the Court intends to uphold the constitutional validity of Mississippi&#8217;s 15-week protection. That is the baseline, and should not satisfy Americans concerned with protecting the human rights of all Americans. To examine whether the Court has the boldness to go all the way and repeal <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe v. Wade<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, let\u2019s look at what happened during the oral arguments.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>READ:\u00a0<em><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/planned-parenthood-casey-settle-abortion-wrong\/\">Some said Planned Parenthood v. Casey settled the abortion conversation. They were wrong.<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><b>Close Reading Indicates the Court Will Overturn Roe\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The oral arguments went extremely well for the pro-life side. The Justices&#8217;s questions made clear that six lean strongly toward upholding the constitutionality of Mississippi&#8217;s law. Examining some lines of questioning, in particular, can illuminate whether the Court will overrule <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Casey <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">completely.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For an opinion to rule, five justices of the nine on the Court must sign on to it. On the current Court, three Justices have made their pro-abortion stance clear and continued to advocate for that view during oral arguments: Breyer, Kagan, and \u00a0Sotomayor. The other six indicated they would choose to uphold Mississippi&#8217;s law, but it is unclear how they may vote on overturning <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">in totality.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Justice Clarence Thomas is the strongest advocate for a proper understanding of our Constitution\u2019s protections for human life on the Court. He began oral arguments by pointing out the truth in a question to Mississippi Solicitor General Scott Stewart, asking, \u201cYou say that [<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">abortion<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">]\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">is the only constitutional right that involves the taking of a life. What difference does that make in your analysis?\u201d Justice Thomas has already ruled once to overrule <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0in the minority opinion in <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Planned Parenthood v. Casey <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(1992). We can be confident that he will be a strong vote once more to overturn <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Justice Samuel Alito drew comparisons between <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and other egregiously wrong decisions in the Supreme Court&#8217;s past, including <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Plessy v. Ferguson, <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">which had enshrined racial discrimination before it was overturned in <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Brown v. The Board of Education<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Justice Alito asked the Solicitor General of the United States Elizabeth Prelogar, who advocated against Mississippi&#8217;s law, \u201cIs it your argument that a case can never be overruled simply because it was egregiously wrong?\u201d Signaling that <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">may be \u201cegregiously wrong\u201d puts Justice Alito in the overturn <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">camp.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Justice Neil Gorsuch has had few opportunities to rule or opine on abortion law, but his questioning boded well for the potential to overturn <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. He asked similar questions to both the pro-life and anti-life advocates, surrounding whether the Court could conceivably uphold Mississippi&#8217;s law without striking down <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, saying, \u201cIf this Court will reject the viability line, do you see any other intelligible principle that the Court could choose?\u201d Both sides said that without the viability standard,\u00a0<\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">would be unworkable. This was an important line of questioning that drew out the absurdity of the \u201cmiddle\u201d option of upholding the 15-week law but also upholding <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Justice Gorsuch\u2019s questioning demonstrated that if Mississippi&#8217;s law is upheld, <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">must be overturned.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Justice Brett Kavanaugh focused on his perception of the Constitution\u2019s neutrality on the issue of abortion. We will look at this more in-depth when we examine the 14th Amendment\u2019s role in this case, but Justice Kavanaugh\u2019s defense of the neutrality of the Constitution when it comes to abortion is incompatible with upholding <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe. <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Justice Amy Coney Barrett strikingly asked about the idea of <em>stare decisis<\/em>, which means to stand by things decided. \u201cAnd I think a lot of the colloquy you&#8217;ve had with all of us has been about the benefits of stare decisis, which I don&#8217;t think anyone disputes,&#8221; she said, &#8220;and, of course, no one can dispute because it&#8217;s part of our stare decisis doctrine that it&#8217;s not an inexorable command and that there are some circumstances in which overruling is possible. You know, we have Plessy, Brown. We have Bowers versus Hardwick, to Lawrence.\u201d <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Plessy <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">enshrined racial segregation and was later overturned, <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Hardwick <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">upheld the criminalization of same-sex relations and was also later overturned. By placing <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">in a similar category to the aforementioned landmark decisions it appears Justice Barrett is leaning towards overturning <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">That leaves us with Chief Justice John Roberts, who is known for placing a high value on institutional legitimacy and popular support for the Court in his decision-making. In this case, Justice Roberts harshly questioned the viability standard, indicating possible approval of Mississippi&#8217;s law, but seemed hesitant to throw out <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">altogether. He even made this comparison: \u201cWhen you get to the viability standard, we share that standard with the People&#8217;s Republic of China and North Korea. And I don&#8217;t think you have to be in favor of looking to international law to set our constitutional standards to be concerned if those [nations] share that particular time period.\u201d Chief Justice Roberts seems likely to uphold Mississippi&#8217;s law, but it is unclear how he will rule on <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">itself.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>READ:\u00a0<em><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/diverse-pro-life-rallied-supreme-court-everyone\/\">A diverse pro-life movement rallied at Supreme Court: \u2018Anyone can be pro-life, and everyone should be\u2019<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mississippi Solicitor General Scott Stewart concluded his argument powerfully, saying, \u201cIn closing, I would say that in his dissent in <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Plessy v. Ferguson<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, Justice Harlan emphasized that there is no caste system here. The humblest in our country is the pure, the most powerful. Our Constitution neither knows nor tolerates distinctions on the basis of race. It took 58 years for this Court to recognize the truth of those realities in a decision, and that was the greatest decision that this Court ever reached. We&#8217;re running on 50 years of Roe. It is an egregiously wrong decision that has inflicted tremendous damage on our country and will continue to do so and take innumerable human lives unless and until this Court overrules it.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">While predicting the final machinations of the Supreme Court is challenging, we can be confident that the Court will uphold the Mississippi protection, and optimistic that it will overturn <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe. <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ultimately, there appear to be five solid votes to overturn <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, counting Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, &amp; Barrett. Chief Justice Roberts could concur in upholding Mississippi&#8217;s law but not going as far to strike down <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe, <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and the final three Justices should be expected to write in dissent<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. If there are indeed at least five votes to overturn <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe,<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0Americans will have the first opportunity in almost 50 years to legally protect their youngest citizens.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>True Citizenship Under the 14th Amendment\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">We should be optimistic about the potential reversal of <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe\u00a0<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and her constitutional progeny. For five decades states have been prevented from protecting preborn children in their jurisdictions, and sending the issue of abortion back to the states will save thousands while removing a grave black mark on our judicial system. But that is not enough. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In a post-Roe<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">world, we know that some big and powerful states like California and New York will not only have a legal abortion, but will subsidize and incentivize the horrific act. Our nation will have \u201cabortion sanctuaries,\u201d states that will even pay out-of-state mothers to come and seek the intentional deaths of their own preborn children. Overturning <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">will be a true generational victory, but we also must keep our eyes long-term on the pursuit of the true application of our constitutional rights to preborn Americans nationwide.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">During oral argument in Dobbs, Justice Kavanaugh said, \u201cAnd I think they also then continue, because the Constitution is neutral, that this Court should be scrupulously neutral on the question of abortion, neither pro-choice nor pro-life, but, because, they say, the Constitution doesn&#8217;t give us the authority, we should leave it to the states\u00a0 and we should be scrupulously neutral on the question and that they are saying here, I think, that we should return to a position of neutrality on that contentious social issue rather than continuing to pick sides on that issue.\u201d <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This statement indicates strongly that Justice Kavanaugh could vote to overturn <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. But the truth is the U.S. Constitution is <em>not<\/em> neutral on abortion. Our Constitution affirmatively guarantees <em>all<\/em> Americans \u2014\u00a0regardless of age, size, or location\u00a0\u2014 equal protection and due process under the law. That must include the right to be born and live.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The 14th Amendment properly understood protects preborn Americans from intentional killing.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0Overturning <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roe <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">will be a critical victory in the fight to protect human life. But we must fight in every state legislature across our nation to protect our children, and we must begin vetting judicial nominees on the basis of their understanding and commitment to the human right to life as protected by the 14th Amendment.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Americans who respect life should be encouraged, and ready to vigorously fight on behalf of the most vulnerable in our society like never before.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em>Bio: Noah Brandt is Director of Government Affairs for Live Action.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveactionnewsonline\/\">\u201cLike\u201d Live Action News on Facebook<\/a>\u00a0for more pro-life news and commentary!<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Roe v. Wade is the U.S. Supreme Court\u2019s last standing defining failure. Dobbs v. Jackson Women\u2019s Health places us on the cusp of witnessing Roe\u2019s demise, allowing for true legal protection for all American citizens. For almost 50 years, Americans have been deprived of the ability to protect our youngest brothers and sisters from the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":855,"featured_media":258670,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[3,9459],"tags":[1255,14616,253,10512,14618,14617,14620,144,197,14619],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>It&#039;s past time for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe - and this time, there&#039;s a good chance they will<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The fact that the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case in the first place indicates that it is ready to issue a change in abortion-related decisions.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"It&#039;s past time for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe - and this time, there&#039;s a good chance they will\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The fact that the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case in the first place indicates that it is ready to issue a change in abortion-related decisions.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-12-10T12:39:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-12-14T21:12:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/GettyImages-1356557101-supreme-court-signs.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"650\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Noah Brandt\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Noah Brandt\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Noah Brandt\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6713f9ff81d4cf908c92b68f28127b15\"},\"headline\":\"It&#8217;s past time for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe &#8211; and this time, there&#8217;s a good chance they will\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-12-10T12:39:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-12-14T21:12:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/\"},\"wordCount\":1892,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"14th Amendment\",\"Casey\",\"Constitution\",\"Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization\",\"Gorsuch\",\"Kavanaugh\",\"Roberts\",\"roe v. wade\",\"Supreme Court\",\"Thomas\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Opinion\",\"Top Story on Homepage\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/\",\"name\":\"It's past time for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe - and this time, there's a good chance they will\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-12-10T12:39:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-12-14T21:12:01+00:00\",\"description\":\"The fact that the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case in the first place indicates that it is ready to issue a change in abortion-related decisions.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"It&#8217;s past time for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe &#8211; and this time, there&#8217;s a good chance they will\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6713f9ff81d4cf908c92b68f28127b15\",\"name\":\"Noah Brandt\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cce5f3607b7ff97230ced67f4b89e3ef?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cce5f3607b7ff97230ced67f4b89e3ef?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Noah Brandt\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/noah-brandt\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"It's past time for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe - and this time, there's a good chance they will","description":"The fact that the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case in the first place indicates that it is ready to issue a change in abortion-related decisions.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"It's past time for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe - and this time, there's a good chance they will","og_description":"The fact that the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case in the first place indicates that it is ready to issue a change in abortion-related decisions.","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2021-12-10T12:39:33+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-12-14T21:12:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":650,"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/GettyImages-1356557101-supreme-court-signs.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Noah Brandt","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@liveaction","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Noah Brandt","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/"},"author":{"name":"Noah Brandt","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6713f9ff81d4cf908c92b68f28127b15"},"headline":"It&#8217;s past time for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe &#8211; and this time, there&#8217;s a good chance they will","datePublished":"2021-12-10T12:39:33+00:00","dateModified":"2021-12-14T21:12:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/"},"wordCount":1892,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"keywords":["14th Amendment","Casey","Constitution","Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization","Gorsuch","Kavanaugh","Roberts","roe v. wade","Supreme Court","Thomas"],"articleSection":["Opinion","Top Story on Homepage"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/","name":"It's past time for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe - and this time, there's a good chance they will","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-12-10T12:39:33+00:00","dateModified":"2021-12-14T21:12:01+00:00","description":"The fact that the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case in the first place indicates that it is ready to issue a change in abortion-related decisions.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/time-supreme-court-overturn-roe-chance-will\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"It&#8217;s past time for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe &#8211; and this time, there&#8217;s a good chance they will"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6713f9ff81d4cf908c92b68f28127b15","name":"Noah Brandt","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cce5f3607b7ff97230ced67f4b89e3ef?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cce5f3607b7ff97230ced67f4b89e3ef?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Noah Brandt"},"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/noah-brandt\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258642"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/855"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=258642"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258642\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":258718,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258642\/revisions\/258718"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/258670"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=258642"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=258642"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=258642"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}