{"id":235728,"date":"2020-12-05T13:53:17","date_gmt":"2020-12-05T19:53:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/news\/?p=235728"},"modified":"2020-12-05T21:53:49","modified_gmt":"2020-12-06T03:53:49","slug":"supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court may hear case regarding discriminatory pro-life buffer zones in Pittsburgh"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><p>Alliance Defending Freedom has asked the United States Supreme Court to take up its appeal of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.adflegal.org\/case\/bruni-v-city-pittsburgh\"><em>Bruni v. City of Pittsburgh<\/em><\/a>, regarding the enactment of a 15-foot buffer zone in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, which bars pro-life sidewalk counselors from practicing their First Amendment right to freedom of speech.<\/p>\n<p>The buffer zone law bans free speech on public sidewalks in painted zones outside of medical facility entrances. However, the city painted those zones around <em>just two facilities<\/em> \u2014 Pittsburgh&#8217;s two <em>abortion<\/em> businesses \u2014\u00a0and enforced the ban selectively against pro-life sidewalk counselors.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/breaking-pro-life-victory-as-massachusetts-buffer-zone-law-struck-down\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">struck down<\/a> a similar Massachusetts law in 2014, and as a result, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld the Pittsburgh city ordinance but shockingly\u00a0<em>rewrote<\/em> <em>the law<\/em>. It ruled in October 2019 that the Pittsburgh buffer zone does not apply to sidewalk counseling but only prayer or standing with a sign or wearing buttons, according to ADF. The Court ruled the ban was constitutional.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;[The Appeals court] upheld the modified ordinance&#8217;s prohibition against other types of pro-life expression,&#8221; said ADF in a press release. &#8220;ADF is arguing that the lower court lacked the authority to rewrite the ordinance and should have declared it unconstitutional in any event.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>READ:\u00a0<em><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/sidewalk-counselors-free-speech-covid-19-lockdown\/\">Sidewalk counselors nearly blocked from exercising free speech due to COVID-19 lockdown<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The petition filed by ADF called the Third Circuit&#8217;s decision &#8220;ineffective,&#8221; noting that city officials are not required to follow it and would still be able to hold pro-lifers criminally liable. According to ADF Vice President of Appellate Advocacy John Bursch, federal courts <em>cannot<\/em> &#8220;rewrite state laws to save themselves from constitutional attack&#8221; \u2014 yet that is exactly what the Third Circuit did in this case.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;When the government regulates speech based on its subject matter or viewpoint, it violates the First Amendment,&#8221; wrote Brusch in an op-ed for <a href=\"https:\/\/thehill.com\/blogs\/congress-blog\/civil-rights\/528365-constitution-doesnt-allow-special-burdens-on-pro-life-speech#.X8kyGNnCqFs.twitter\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Hill<\/a>. &#8220;Pittsburgh did just that when it enacted a law that bans sidewalk counseling within 15 feet of the city\u2019s two abortion clinics, including on the public sidewalk. The city allowed others to speak within the buffer zone about sports, the weather, or anything else it sees as purely social or random, while forcing pro-life speech out. That wrongly made the sidewalk counselors\u2019 message of love, gentleness, and help seem dangerous and illegitimate, and made it difficult for the counselors to speak with willing passersby.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>ADF is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scotusblog.com\/case-files\/cases\/bruni-v-city-of-pittsburgh-pennsylvania\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">awaiting word<\/a> on whether the Supreme Court will agree to take up the case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveactionnewsonline\/\">\u201cLike\u201d Live Action News on Facebook<\/a>\u00a0for more pro-life news and commentary!<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Alliance Defending Freedom has asked the United States Supreme Court to take up its appeal of\u00a0Bruni v. City of Pittsburgh, regarding the enactment of a 15-foot buffer zone in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, which bars pro-life sidewalk counselors from practicing their First Amendment right to freedom of speech. The buffer zone law bans free speech on public [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":62,"featured_media":213586,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[2793,7,3473],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Supreme Court may hear case regarding discriminatory pro-life buffer zones in Pittsburgh<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Alliance Defending Freedom has asked the Supreme Court to take up an appeal against the enactment of a 15-foot buffer zone in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court may hear case regarding discriminatory pro-life buffer zones in Pittsburgh\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Alliance Defending Freedom has asked the Supreme Court to take up an appeal against the enactment of a 15-foot buffer zone in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-12-05T19:53:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-12-06T03:53:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/40-days-for-life.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"667\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Nancy Flanders\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Nancy Flanders\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Nancy Flanders\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef\"},\"headline\":\"Supreme Court may hear case regarding discriminatory pro-life buffer zones in Pittsburgh\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-12-05T19:53:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-12-06T03:53:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/\"},\"wordCount\":428,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Activism\",\"Human Rights\",\"Newsbreak\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court may hear case regarding discriminatory pro-life buffer zones in Pittsburgh\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-12-05T19:53:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-12-06T03:53:49+00:00\",\"description\":\"Alliance Defending Freedom has asked the Supreme Court to take up an appeal against the enactment of a 15-foot buffer zone in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court may hear case regarding discriminatory pro-life buffer zones in Pittsburgh\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef\",\"name\":\"Nancy Flanders\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Nancy Flanders\"},\"description\":\"Nancy Flanders is Associate Editor for Live Action News. She has 25 years of experience writing and editing. For more than a decade, she has focused her work on pro-life issues through human interest stories and political issues regarding abortion and physician-assisted death as well as research articles and op-eds dismantling the lies of the pro-abortion, pro-death agenda. Her work has appeared in Catholic Digest, Pregnancy Help News, and a variety of other publications.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/nancy\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court may hear case regarding discriminatory pro-life buffer zones in Pittsburgh","description":"Alliance Defending Freedom has asked the Supreme Court to take up an appeal against the enactment of a 15-foot buffer zone in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court may hear case regarding discriminatory pro-life buffer zones in Pittsburgh","og_description":"Alliance Defending Freedom has asked the Supreme Court to take up an appeal against the enactment of a 15-foot buffer zone in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2020-12-05T19:53:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-12-06T03:53:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":667,"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/40-days-for-life.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Nancy Flanders","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@liveaction","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Nancy Flanders","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/"},"author":{"name":"Nancy Flanders","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef"},"headline":"Supreme Court may hear case regarding discriminatory pro-life buffer zones in Pittsburgh","datePublished":"2020-12-05T19:53:17+00:00","dateModified":"2020-12-06T03:53:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/"},"wordCount":428,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Activism","Human Rights","Newsbreak"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/","name":"Supreme Court may hear case regarding discriminatory pro-life buffer zones in Pittsburgh","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-12-05T19:53:17+00:00","dateModified":"2020-12-06T03:53:49+00:00","description":"Alliance Defending Freedom has asked the Supreme Court to take up an appeal against the enactment of a 15-foot buffer zone in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-buffer-zones-pittsburgh\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court may hear case regarding discriminatory pro-life buffer zones in Pittsburgh"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef","name":"Nancy Flanders","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Nancy Flanders"},"description":"Nancy Flanders is Associate Editor for Live Action News. She has 25 years of experience writing and editing. For more than a decade, she has focused her work on pro-life issues through human interest stories and political issues regarding abortion and physician-assisted death as well as research articles and op-eds dismantling the lies of the pro-abortion, pro-death agenda. Her work has appeared in Catholic Digest, Pregnancy Help News, and a variety of other publications.","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/nancy\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235728"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/62"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235728"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235728\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":235760,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235728\/revisions\/235760"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/213586"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235728"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235728"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235728"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}