{"id":227130,"date":"2020-07-11T09:26:00","date_gmt":"2020-07-11T14:26:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/news\/?p=227130"},"modified":"2020-07-10T22:44:37","modified_gmt":"2020-07-11T03:44:37","slug":"media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/","title":{"rendered":"What the media didn’t tell you about the Supreme Court’s Louisiana abortion regulations case"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

(CNS News\/MRC<\/a>) Last week, pro-lifers were dismayed<\/a> when the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Louisiana\u2019s common sense abortion facility regulations in June Medical Services v. Russo<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Many thought that the presence of Trump appointees Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh on the U.S. Supreme Court would create a durable majority that would uphold both abortion facility regulations and incremental pro-life laws. However, in this case, Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the liberals on the Supreme Court, resulting in the necessary five votes to strike down the Louisiana law.<\/p>\n

Much of the subsequent mainstream media coverage of the decision simply parroted<\/a> the majority opinion that the Louisiana clinic regulations were very similar to the Texas clinic regulations the Supreme Court struck down in Whole Woman\u2019s Health v. Hellerstedt\u00a0<\/em>in 2016. As such, in this case, the Supreme Court was properly applying precedent. However, much of the media reporting on June Medical Services v. Russo<\/em> missed<\/a> three very important distinctions between the Louisiana regulations and the Texas regulations that the Supreme Court should have considered when ruling on the case.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Unlike the Texas regulations, the Louisiana clinic regulations were never in effect for a\u00a0significant amount of time<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Like the Louisiana regulations, the Texas clinic regulations included a provision that abortion doctors have admitting privileges at a hospital less than 30 miles away from the facility where they were performing abortions. The Texas admitting privileges requirement took effect<\/a> in November 2013 and largely stayed in effect until the Supreme Court\u2019s decision in 2016. NBC News reports<\/a>\u00a0that between 2013 and 2016, the number of abortion facilities in Texas fell from 42 to 19.<\/p>\n

    There is certainly disagreement about how the closure of these Texas abortion facilities would impact the constitutionality of the abortion regulations that were enacted in the Lone Star State. However, since part of the Texas regulations actually took effect for an extended amount of time, there was actual evidence of the law\u2019s impact in Texas. Conversely, the Louisiana clinic regulations were never in effect for a significant amount of time. As such, the Supreme Court justices ruling on the case were basing their decision on speculation \u2013 not evidence.<\/p>\n

    READ:\u00a0The June Medical Supreme Court decision was not a win for women\u2019s health care<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Louisiana Abortion Doctors Might Have Been Able To Obtain Hospital Admitting Privileges<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      The media coverage of the decision indicated that several doctors who perform abortions in Louisiana would be unable to obtain hospital admitting privileges. However, a closer look at the trial record indicates that this may not be the case. The trial record indicates there are five doctors who perform<\/a> abortions at the three abortion clinics in Louisiana. In his dissent, Justice Alito nicely describes how some of these physicians only made<\/a> “perfunctory efforts” to get admitting privileges at nearby hospitals.<\/p>\n

      For instance, one doctor (Doe 2) did not apply to a hospital where he previously had admitting privileges and instead applied elsewhere. Another doctor (Doe 6) applied for admitting privileges at one hospital and made an inquiry at a second, but made no efforts to get admitting privileges at six other local hospitals. A hospital was willing to grant a third doctor (Doe 5) admitting privileges, if he could find another physician wiling to cover for him when he is not available.\u00a0 However, when one doctor turned down Doe 5\u2019s request, he did not as ask others. Clearly, these three doctors could have expended more effort in their attempts to obtain admitting privileges at nearby hospitals.<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Louisiana Presented Evidence of the Health Benefits of Clinic Regulations<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Many media outlets indicated that these clinic regulations offered little in the way of tangible health benefits. However, Justice Gorsuch\u2019s dissent provides evidence that clinic regulations can improve public health.\u00a0 He states that Louisiana\u2019s abortion facilities \u201chistorically have done little to ensure provider competence.\u201d Specifically he says that abortion facilities have failed to perform background checks on doctors and have \u201ceven hired physicians whose specialties were unrelated to abortion.\u201d He also argued \u201cthe loss of admitting privileges” “might signal a problem meriting further investigation.\u201d Gorsuch cited a situation where one abortion doctor lost admitting privileges after a patient\u2019s death and the state licensing board placed limits on his practice.<\/p>\n

        Gorsuch also cited testimony that was presented during the legislative hearings on these clinic regulations.\u00a0The hearings revealed that Louisiana abortion facilities were cited for numerous ethical and safety infractions in recent years. \u00a0Additionally, the legislative hearings also found a number of instances of misconduct. There was one situation where a woman was dismissed from an abortion facility while hemorrhaging. This woman eventually went to a hospital where an emergency room physician had to remove fetal body parts the abortion doctor left behind. Additionally, there were two separate situations where botched abortions in Louisiana abortion facilities resulted in emergency hysterectomies.<\/p>\n

        Overall, relatively few people read Supreme Court opinions. Most citizens are largely dependent on the mainstream media to both report on and explain Supreme Court rulings.\u00a0\u00a0 In this particular case, most media outlets provided scant coverage or analysis of the dissenting opinions written by Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Samuel Alito, and Brett Kavanaugh. These dissents contained not only good insights about abortion jurisprudence, but also useful facts that distinguished this case from Whole Woman\u2019s Health v. Hellerstedt<\/em>. Gorsuch\u2019s dissent, in particular, provided some very valuable information about abortion facility misconduct in Louisiana.<\/p>\n

        Overall, it is disappointing, but unsurprising that the mainstream media chose to ignore this.<\/p>\n

        Michael J. New is a visiting assistant professor at the Busch School of Business at The Catholic University of America and an associate scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute. Follow him on Twitter @Michael_J_New<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

        Editor’s Note: This article was published at CNSNews.com<\/a> and is reprinted here with permission.<\/em><\/p>\n

        \u201cLike\u201d Live Action News on Facebook<\/a>\u00a0for more pro-life news and commentary!<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

        (CNS News\/MRC) Last week, pro-lifers were dismayed when the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Louisiana\u2019s common sense abortion facility regulations in June Medical Services v. Russo. Many thought that the presence of Trump appointees Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh on the U.S. Supreme Court would create a durable majority that would uphold both abortion facility […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":575,"featured_media":193509,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[15,7077],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nWhat the media didn't tell you about the Supreme Court's Louisiana abortion regulations case<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Much of the media missed three important distinctions between the Louisiana regulations and the Texas regulations that the Supreme Court didn't consider.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"What the media didn't tell you about the Supreme Court's Louisiana abortion regulations case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Much of the media missed three important distinctions between the Louisiana regulations and the Texas regulations that the Supreme Court didn't consider.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-07-11T14:26:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-07-11T03:44:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/supreme-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"650\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Michael J. New\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Michael J. New\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Michael J. New\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/05c1fddf2c6975f349680f7794d680c4\"},\"headline\":\"What the media didn’t tell you about the Supreme Court’s Louisiana abortion regulations case\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-11T14:26:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-07-11T03:44:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/\"},\"wordCount\":986,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Analysis\",\"Guest Column\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/\",\"name\":\"What the media didn't tell you about the Supreme Court's Louisiana abortion regulations case\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-11T14:26:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-07-11T03:44:37+00:00\",\"description\":\"Much of the media missed three important distinctions between the Louisiana regulations and the Texas regulations that the Supreme Court didn't consider.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"What the media didn’t tell you about the Supreme Court’s Louisiana abortion regulations case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/05c1fddf2c6975f349680f7794d680c4\",\"name\":\"Michael J. New\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4ae1ade5b9c941ded6d21d73502e3a8a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4ae1ade5b9c941ded6d21d73502e3a8a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Michael J. New\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/michael-j-new\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"What the media didn't tell you about the Supreme Court's Louisiana abortion regulations case","description":"Much of the media missed three important distinctions between the Louisiana regulations and the Texas regulations that the Supreme Court didn't consider.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"What the media didn't tell you about the Supreme Court's Louisiana abortion regulations case","og_description":"Much of the media missed three important distinctions between the Louisiana regulations and the Texas regulations that the Supreme Court didn't consider.","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2020-07-11T14:26:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-07-11T03:44:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":650,"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/supreme-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Michael J. New","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@liveaction","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Michael J. New","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/"},"author":{"name":"Michael J. New","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/05c1fddf2c6975f349680f7794d680c4"},"headline":"What the media didn’t tell you about the Supreme Court’s Louisiana abortion regulations case","datePublished":"2020-07-11T14:26:00+00:00","dateModified":"2020-07-11T03:44:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/"},"wordCount":986,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Analysis","Guest Column"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/","name":"What the media didn't tell you about the Supreme Court's Louisiana abortion regulations case","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-07-11T14:26:00+00:00","dateModified":"2020-07-11T03:44:37+00:00","description":"Much of the media missed three important distinctions between the Louisiana regulations and the Texas regulations that the Supreme Court didn't consider.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/media-supreme-court-louisiana-abortions-regulations\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"What the media didn’t tell you about the Supreme Court’s Louisiana abortion regulations case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/05c1fddf2c6975f349680f7794d680c4","name":"Michael J. New","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4ae1ade5b9c941ded6d21d73502e3a8a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4ae1ade5b9c941ded6d21d73502e3a8a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Michael J. New"},"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/michael-j-new\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227130"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/575"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=227130"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227130\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":227143,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227130\/revisions\/227143"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/193509"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=227130"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=227130"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=227130"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}