{"id":225586,"date":"2020-06-14T11:45:47","date_gmt":"2020-06-14T16:45:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/news\/?p=225586"},"modified":"2020-06-13T17:01:48","modified_gmt":"2020-06-13T22:01:48","slug":"ucsf-saves-wanted-babies-devalues-kills-unwanted","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/ucsf-saves-wanted-babies-devalues-kills-unwanted\/","title":{"rendered":"UCSF pulls out all the stops to save ‘wanted babies,’ but devalues and kills those deemed ‘unwanted’"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

When are babies worth saving as opposed to killing? For the abortion industry, that distinction relies solely upon what someone feels\u2014not on science<\/em>. Research being conducted at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) reveals the hypocrisy of how the medical community treats “wanted” versus “unwanted” babies.<\/p>\n

A UCSF’s Benioff Children’s Hospital, a fetal treatment center uses cutting edge research<\/a> to help save the lives of preborn babies at risk. Through clinical and experimental research, as well as a pediatric surgery lab, doctors are making great strides towards potentially curing fatal diseases, like twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), gastroschisis, and more. According to their website<\/a>, for example, one of their current focuses is on “solving the general problem of safe access to the fetus early in gestation, including the problem of membrane separation after intervention and the development of new smaller and better minimally invasive techniques.”<\/p>\n

And what are the ways these doctors are looking at addressing these potentially fatal conditions? Examples given include studying laser ablation of placental vessels for TTTS, the effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and research on animals.<\/p>\n

But this is just how they treat wanted<\/em> babies. What happens when babies are unwanted<\/em>?<\/p>\n