{"id":219985,"date":"2020-03-13T10:24:32","date_gmt":"2020-03-13T15:24:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/news\/?p=219985"},"modified":"2020-03-12T18:23:50","modified_gmt":"2020-03-12T23:23:50","slug":"informed-consent-abortion-utah-protest","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/informed-consent-abortion-utah-protest\/","title":{"rendered":"Informed consent abortion bill stirs controversy, as female Utah senators protest"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

An abortion ultrasound bill<\/a> in Utah has garnered significant media attention after all six female senators, Republicans and Democrats alike, walked off the floor in protest when the bill was being called for a vote.<\/p>\n

Republican Senator Deidre Henderson explained why she walked off the floor, despite allegedly opposing abortion. “I am very pro-life, and always vote for pro-life bills,” she told Fox13 News<\/a>. “But I\u2019m concerned that we are overstepping with government mandates of medically unnecessary procedures.”<\/p>\n

Senate Minority Whip Luz Escamilla said, “I rise in support of something that stops government from intruding on someone’s body.”<\/p>\n

Senate sponsor Republican Curt Bramble disagreed with this reasoning, however. “We\u2019re talking about a human being, and having the information relative to that child\u2019s physical being is important as that decision to terminate that child\u2019s life is being made,” he told the Salt Lake Tribune<\/a>.<\/p>\n

But does the bill really mandate “medically unnecessary procedures,” and require “intruding on someone’s body?” Live Action News reviewed the actual text of the bill on March 11, 2020 to shed some light on the truth.<\/p>\n

House Bill 364\u00a0was introduced by a Republican Senator and Representative, and co-sponsored by six Republican Representatives, including two women. The bill mandates a transabdominal ultrasound before an abortion is performed, and also specifies detailed guidelines for obtaining informed consent. The original version of the bill required transvaginal ultrasounds, which are more invasive than transabdominal ultrasounds.<\/p>\n

READ: Abortion worker horrified after witnessing late-term abortion on ultrasound<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

The bill’s language “requires a medical professional to do the following before a pregnant woman may\u00a0give informed consent to an abortion:\u00a0display live fetal images of the unborn child;\u00a0describe the fetal images, make audible the fetal heartbeat, if possible; and\u00a0provide written confirmation to the pregnant woman stating that the medical professional complied with the requirements.” The bill also specifies that “a pregnant woman may choose not to view the fetal images and not to\u00a0listen to the fetal heartbeat.”<\/p>\n

The guidelines for informed consent require that the abortionists shares certain specific information with the woman seeking an abortion. This information is to include “the nature of the proposed abortion procedure, specifically how the procedure [] will affect the fetus, the risks and alternatives to the abortion procedure or treatment, the options and consequences of aborting a medication-induced abortion (if relevant),\u00a0the probable gestational age and a description of the development of the\u00a0unborn child at the time the abortion would be performed,\u00a0the medical risks associated with carrying her child to term,” as well as support resources if genetic testing or other prenatal diagnostics suggest that the child has Down Syndrome.<\/p>\n