{"id":206505,"date":"2019-07-15T13:32:06","date_gmt":"2019-07-15T18:32:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/news\/?p=206505"},"modified":"2019-07-14T23:08:34","modified_gmt":"2019-07-15T04:08:34","slug":"pro-life-fight-terminate-parental-rights-rapists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/pro-life-fight-terminate-parental-rights-rapists\/","title":{"rendered":"The pro-life fight to terminate the parental rights of rapists"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

Perhaps you\u2019ve seen the posts on social media featuring Christopher Mirasolo, still being circulated from nearly two years ago when a judge gave this rapist parental rights in my home state of Michigan. His case is often used to accuse people who are pro-life in every circumstance of wanting rape survivors to be tethered to rapists. So what is the correct response to this issue?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"

Christopher Mirasolo<\/p><\/div>\n

Proof that pro-lifers care about rape survivors and their children<\/strong><\/p>\n

This was my case. Tiffany, the rape survivor mother who had been raped at 12 by then 18-year-old Mirasolo, contacted me two years ago when her child was eight, after a judge gave Mirasolo joint legal custody and parenting time. She found me through my work with Right to Life of Michigan fighting on behalf of rape survivors to draft and pass the Michigan Rape Survivor Child Custody Act. I chose to represent Tiffany pro bono and thankfully got the judge\u00a0<\/span>to reverse his ruling based on the law we had worked to pass.<\/span><\/p>\n

Tiffany’s case was particularly egregious, because after she\u2019d been abducted and raped, and was missing for two days, her rapist ran off and she was treated as a runaway by the rural area law enforcement. A month later when she was pregnant, he was arrested for \u201cattempted criminal sexual conduct\u201d and eventually received a plea deal, serving just six months<\/em> in county jail for what should have been 25 years to life in prison. When he was released, he raped another girl, age 15, was given another<\/em> plea deal and served a mere four years<\/em> in prison. A two-time convicted child molester, he was subsequently given parental rights.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"

Tiffany and Rebecca<\/p><\/div>\n

Despite these horrific circumstances and despite her parents wanting her to abort, Tiffany, at 12 years old, knew her child was innocent and that abortion was murder. The local sheriff didn\u2019t see an urgency to make an arrest after her abduction. If she had aborted her son, there never would have been arrest. It was only because she was carrying the child that authorities finally acted. This child is forever proof to the community and now to the world of how horribly the Sanilac County Sheriff, Prosecutor, and Court handled her case. Michigan has totally changed procedures because of the notoriety of this case — because there\u2019s a living child.<\/span><\/p>\n

For years, Tiffany felt like no one cared. Then, pro-lifers rallied around her. After I reached out to the local Right to Life affiliate in her area, they hosted a huge rally at the courthouse on the day of the hearing. My 100% pro-life friends at the Attorney General\u2019s office, along with the Lieutenant Governor, stepped in. Lt. Gov. Brian Calley spoke at the courthouse rally for Tiffany, and for the first time in Michigan history, the Attorney General, Bill Schuette, formally intervened in a family law matter at the trial level. Tiffany said she felt like the cavalry had arrived, and indeed it had.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"

(L to R) Lt. Gov. Brian Calley, Tiffany’s mother, Rebecca, and Tiffany<\/p><\/div>\n

Pro-lifers in media also rallied to support Tiffany. Glenn Beck — whom I had met when Live Action president Lila Rose first hosted his show and a group of us from Save the 1 were guests — had Tiffany on his program and asked his audience to help change her life. Because of him, over $103,000 was raised for her on GoFundMe, so that Tiffany was able to get out of her county and buy a house for her and her son! Today, Tiffany hopes to share more publicly about why abortion is never the answer.<\/span><\/p>\n

W<\/span>here were pro-choicers during this time? Nowhere, unless you count the four votes against<\/em> the Michigan Rape Survivor Child Custody Act from pro-choice Democrats, proving they support only one choice: abortion. One of those, State Rep. Marcia Hovey-Wright, was the former Executive Director of Muskegon Area Planned Parenthood. There were no abortion rights advocates offering assistance for Tiffany, but there were complaints on social media that she was being represented by a pro-life activist attorney.<\/span><\/p>\n

If you ever hear that pro-lifers don\u2019t care once a baby is born, tell them Tiffany\u2019s story!<\/span><\/p>\n

The years-long fight to remove rapists’ parental rights<\/strong><\/p>\n

I first talked about this issue as a young family law attorney, because I was conceived in rape, and I would not have wanted anything to do with the man who raped my mother. Over 12 years ago, I met Shauna Prewitt when I spoke at Georgetown Law School. She had fought her rapist over parental rights, and even wrote a piece for the Georgetown Law Review on the parental rights of rapists, explaining how the rhetoric regarding abortion causes rape survivors to be unprotected because society assumes a true rape victim would abort and couldn\u2019t possibly love \u201cthe rapist\u2019s child.\u201d Such insulting language only perpetuates such myths.<\/span><\/p>\n

So Shauna and I worked with others who had fought to terminate rapists’ parental rights, forming Hope After Rape Conception (a now-defunct group) to advocate for model legislation, the Rape Survivor Child Custody Act. At the time, there were only 17 states with any law to protect mothers who conceived in rape. Convictions are not<\/em> required to terminate parental rights for child molestation or child abuse. In Santosky v Kramer<\/em>, the U.S. Supreme Court said that \u201cclear and convincing evidence\u201d meets due process standards, since this is a civil matter, and that\u2019s the highest standard in civil cases.<\/span><\/p>\n

Legislation protecting rape survivors and their children is gaining significant ground
\n<\/strong>
\n<\/span>A<\/span>\u00a0federal Rape Survivor Child Custody Act has been passed, giving an incentive to states to receive additional funds for rape survivor programs if they pass it at the state level using the clear and convincing evidence standard. This legislation can have a real impact. If a pregnant rape victim knows she\u2019ll be protected, she will be even more likely to choose life.<\/p>\n

Organizations such as Right to Life of Michigan, Personhood Iowa, and Georgia Right to Life made efforts to help pass this legislation in their states, without requiring a rape conviction. Alaska Right to Life took this up as well. Members of Save The 1 have worked on this legislation all over the country, and many were able to testify.<\/span><\/p>\n

Today, all but one state<\/em> has passed legislation to provide for the termination of the parental rights of rapists: Minnesota. But I\u2019m working with a state legislator on language right now. (His wife is a member of Save The 1, a birthmother who became pregnant by rape\/incest.) Out of those 49 states, nearly half use the clear and convincing evidence standard and we\u2019re working on the rest to get them to change their laws. Requiring a rape conviction is overly burdensome, especially since it\u2019s not a criminal matter, and so few ever report the rape. If a rape conviction had been required in Michigan, Tiffany would not have been protected because her rapist was only convicted of attempted rape.<\/span><\/p>\n