{"id":19675,"date":"2012-07-30T14:47:12","date_gmt":"2012-07-30T18:47:12","guid":{"rendered":"\/news\/?p=19675"},"modified":"2013-04-03T22:23:44","modified_gmt":"2013-04-04T02:23:44","slug":"justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/","title":{"rendered":"Justice Scalia’s refresher on constitutional originalism"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

\"\"<\/a>Over the weekend, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia appeared on Fox News Sunday<\/em> to chat with Chris Wallace about his new book, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts<\/a><\/em>. (Video here<\/a>, transcript here<\/a>.) The exchange is invaluable to understanding the judicial aspects of the abortion debate.<\/p>\n

First, Scalia explains his general approach to constitutional interpretation:<\/p>\n

Originalism is sort of subspecies of textualism. Textualism means you are governed by the text. That’s the only thing that is relevant to your decision, not whether the outcome is desirable, not whether legislative history says this or that. But the text of the statute. Originalism says that when you consult the text, you give it the meaning it had when it was adopted, not some later modern meaning.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The left\u2019s preferred alternative is \u201cLiving Constitution\u201d theory, which holds that our interpretation of the Constitution must change alongside society\u2019s changing values and desires, because, as President Woodrow Wilson put it<\/a>, government is \u201ca living thing … modified by its environment, necessitated by its tasks, shaped to its functions by the sheer pressure of life. No living thing can have its organs offset against each other as checks, and live.\u201d<\/p>\n

Simply put, this is a sham that defeats the whole point of having a Constitution: placing firm limits on what government can do to the people and what people can do to each other. This function will never change because essential human nature is constant, as is the moral truth at America\u2019s core – the equal right of every human being to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.<\/p>\n

Yes, the Constitution is imperfect, and our preferences may change. But when they do, the only legitimate way to incorporate those changes into the Constitution is through the amendment process<\/a>, which guarantees that changes happen only for matters of the utmost importance and preserves the integrity of the rest of the document – as opposed to simply reinterpreting it to suit our whims and agendas, which paves the way for rationalizing anything<\/a> government might want to do to the people.<\/p>\n

Later, the conversation turns to one of our history\u2019s starkest examples of what happens when originalism is abandoned in favor of Living Constitutionalism:<\/p>\n

WALLACE:<\/strong>\u00a0There is one Supreme Court decision, reading a lot of your writings and speeches over the years, that seems to distress you more than any other. And that is Roe versus Wade, the 1973 decision that says that women have a constitutional right to abortion. You say that it is it a lie. And, in fact, while generally willing, you say, to accept long standing precedents, you say you will continue to press to overturn Roe. Why?<\/p>\n

SCALIA:<\/strong>\u00a0Well, I’m not sure if I could say this distresses me more than any other. It is in my mind the clearest example of being a non-textualist and non-originalist. No one ever thought that the American people ever voted to prohibit limitations on abortion. I mean, there is nothing in the Constitution that says that.<\/p>\n

WALLACE:<\/strong>\u00a0What about the right to privacy that the court found in known 1965?<\/p>\n

SCALIA:<\/strong>\u00a0There is no right to privacy. No generalized right to privacy.<\/p>\n

WALLACE:<\/strong>\u00a0Well, in the Griswold case, the court said there was.<\/p>\n

SCALIA:<\/strong>\u00a0Indeed it did, and that was — that was wrong. In the earlier case, the court had said the opposite. Look, the way the Fourth Amendment reads that people shall be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

To grasp just how badly the court stretched the Constitution\u2019s privacy protections, consider that Griswold v. Connecticut<\/em>\u2019s author, Justice William Douglas, justified<\/a> his decision by claiming that \u201cspecific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have penumbras, formed by emanations from those guarantees that help give them life and substance,\u201d meaning he wasn\u2019t looking to the actual text of the Constitution, but instead imagining what he wanted to find in the vague shadow<\/a> of an emanation – pure gibberish.<\/p>\n

Further, a pregnant woman\u2019s right to privacy cannot possibly encompass abortion for the simple fact that it\u2019s not private<\/em>; it also affects someone other than that woman. The Roe<\/em> court simply punted<\/a> on the case\u2019s most important factor, declaring, \u201cWe need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins.\u201d<\/p>\n

Lastly, it\u2019s worth remembering that Scalia\u2019s not exactly out on a limb here – even many liberal and pro-choice legal scholars admit<\/a> that Roe<\/em> is an embarrassment. For instance:<\/p>\n

Laurence Tribe<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 Harvard Law School. Lawyer for Al Gore in 2000.<\/p>\n

\u201cOne of the most curious things about\u00a0Roe\u00a0is that, behind its own verbal smokescreen,\u00a0the substantive judgment on which it rests is nowhere to be found<\/span>.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Supreme Court, 1972 Term\u2014Foreword: Toward a Model of Roles in the Due Process of Life and Law,\u201d 87\u00a0Harvard Law Review\u00a01, 7 (1973).<\/p>\n

Edward Lazarus<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 Former clerk to Harry Blackmun.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat, exactly, is the problem with\u00a0Roe? The problem, I believe, is that it has little connection to the Constitutional right it purportedly interpreted. A constitutional right to privacy broad enough to include abortion has no meaningful foundation in constitutional text, history, or precedent – at least, it does not if those sources are fairly described and reasonably faithfully followed.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Lingering Problems with\u00a0Roe v. Wade, and Why the Recent Senate Hearings on Michael McConnell\u2019s Nomination Only Underlined Them<\/a>,\u201d FindLaw Legal Commentary, Oct. 3, 2002<\/p>\n

John Hart Ely<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 Yale Law School, Harvard Law School, Stanford Law School<\/p>\n

Roe\u00a0\u201cis not constitutional law and gives almost no sense of an obligation to try to be.\u201d
\n\u201cThe Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on\u00a0Roe v. Wade,\u201d 82\u00a0Yale Law Journal<\/a>, 920, 935-937 (1973).<\/p>\n

Kermit Roosevelt<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 University of Pennsylvania Law School<\/p>\n

\u201cYou will be hard-pressed to find a constitutional law professor, even among those who support the idea of constitutional protection for the right to choose, who will embrace the opinion itself rather than the result. This is not surprising. As constitutional argument,\u00a0Roe\u00a0is barely coherent<\/span>. The court pulled its fundamental right to choose more or less from the constitutional ether.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cShaky Basis for a Constitutional \u2018Right\u2019<\/a>,\u201d\u00a0Washington Post, January 22, 2003.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Shamefully, few pro-abortion activists are willing to right this constitutional wrong and return abortion policy to the democratic process, because all they care about is preserving their preferred result. So let\u2019s ask our pro-choice readers: are you willing to put the Constitution above your ideology? Do you recognize any higher goods to which the \u201cright to choose\u201d must yield?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Constitution above ideology.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":54,"featured_media":19690,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nJustice Scalia's refresher on constitutional originalism - Live Action News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Justice Scalia's refresher on constitutional originalism - Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Constitution above ideology.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-07-30T18:47:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2013-04-04T02:23:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/07\/scalia.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"715\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"431\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Calvin Freiburger\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Calvin Freiburger\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Calvin Freiburger\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6eb2bf94c8064b71953ba137bf413c4d\"},\"headline\":\"Justice Scalia’s refresher on constitutional originalism\",\"datePublished\":\"2012-07-30T18:47:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-04-04T02:23:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/\"},\"wordCount\":1085,\"commentCount\":21,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Politics\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/\",\"name\":\"Justice Scalia's refresher on constitutional originalism - Live Action News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-07-30T18:47:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-04-04T02:23:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Justice Scalia’s refresher on constitutional originalism\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6eb2bf94c8064b71953ba137bf413c4d\",\"name\":\"Calvin Freiburger\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e27533b6967b0c47cce543ba67e2a7a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e27533b6967b0c47cce543ba67e2a7a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Calvin Freiburger\"},\"description\":\"Calvin Freiburger is a Wisconsin-based conservative writer and 2011 Hillsdale College graduate, dedicated to the principles of the American Founding\u2014individual liberty, limited government, public virtue, free markets, and strong defense\u2014though he believes no issue is more important than defending the unalienable rights of society\u2019s most vulnerable members. Calvin is an editor and administrator for TheFederalistPapers.org, and his work has appeared on NewsRealBlog.com, PatriotUpdate.com, LifeNews.com, LifeSiteNews.com, RightWisconsin.com, AmericanThinker.com, Stream.org, AmericanClarion.org, and more. Please check out his official website, ConservativeStandards.com. Follow @CalFreiburger\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/calvin-freiburger\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Justice Scalia's refresher on constitutional originalism - Live Action News","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Justice Scalia's refresher on constitutional originalism - Live Action News","og_description":"Constitution above ideology.","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2012-07-30T18:47:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2013-04-04T02:23:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":"715","height":"431","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/07\/scalia.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Calvin Freiburger","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@liveaction","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Calvin Freiburger","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/"},"author":{"name":"Calvin Freiburger","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6eb2bf94c8064b71953ba137bf413c4d"},"headline":"Justice Scalia’s refresher on constitutional originalism","datePublished":"2012-07-30T18:47:12+00:00","dateModified":"2013-04-04T02:23:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/"},"wordCount":1085,"commentCount":21,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Politics"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/","name":"Justice Scalia's refresher on constitutional originalism - Live Action News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-07-30T18:47:12+00:00","dateModified":"2013-04-04T02:23:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Justice Scalia’s refresher on constitutional originalism"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6eb2bf94c8064b71953ba137bf413c4d","name":"Calvin Freiburger","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e27533b6967b0c47cce543ba67e2a7a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e27533b6967b0c47cce543ba67e2a7a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Calvin Freiburger"},"description":"Calvin Freiburger is a Wisconsin-based conservative writer and 2011 Hillsdale College graduate, dedicated to the principles of the American Founding\u2014individual liberty, limited government, public virtue, free markets, and strong defense\u2014though he believes no issue is more important than defending the unalienable rights of society\u2019s most vulnerable members. Calvin is an editor and administrator for TheFederalistPapers.org, and his work has appeared on NewsRealBlog.com, PatriotUpdate.com, LifeNews.com, LifeSiteNews.com, RightWisconsin.com, AmericanThinker.com, Stream.org, AmericanClarion.org, and more. Please check out his official website, ConservativeStandards.com. Follow @CalFreiburger","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/calvin-freiburger\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19675"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/54"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19675"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19675\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19690"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19675"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19675"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19675"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}