{"id":196618,"date":"2019-02-15T15:01:47","date_gmt":"2019-02-15T21:01:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/news\/?p=196618"},"modified":"2019-02-15T15:01:47","modified_gmt":"2019-02-15T21:01:47","slug":"attorney-general-roe-v-wade-overruled","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/attorney-general-roe-v-wade-overruled\/","title":{"rendered":"New US Attorney General once claimed Roe v. Wade ‘should be overruled’"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

The newly confirmed head of the U.S. Department of Justice, 68-year-old William Barr, once stated that\u00a0Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided and should be overruled, adding that he didn’t believe the right to privacy extended to abortion. On Thursday, by a vote of\u00a054-45 which fell largely along party lines, the Senate moved to confirm Barr as the next Attorney General of the United States. According to Life News<\/a>, Barr refused to say that he would defend Roe v. Wade<\/em>, “and said most challenges to Roe would come from states and that the Justice Department would weigh in where appropriate.”<\/p>\n

Barr previously served as attorney general in the early 1990’s under then president George H. W. Bush<\/a>. Prior to leading the Justice Department in the 1990’s, Barr was the deputy AG and assistant AG overseeing the Office of Legal Counsel and worked with the White House Domestic Policy staff for a year under then-President Ronald Reagan, according to a report<\/a> by Fox News.<\/p>\n

Barr’s nomination by President Donald Trump after former AG Jeff Sessions stepped down in November 2018 was largely opposed by the abortion lobby due in part to statements he made in his 1991 Senate confirmation hearings. When asked<\/a> by Senator Howard Metzenbaum (D-Ohio) at the time about a “woman’s right to choose,” and a “right to privacy,” Barr responded:<\/p>\n

“I haven’t taken a position on it publicly, I don’t believe. I believe that there is a right to privacy in the Constitution. I do not have fixed or settled views on the exact scope of the right to privacy. I do not believe the right to privacy extends to abortion<\/strong>, so I think that my views are consistent with the views that have been taken by the Department since 1983, which is that Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided and should be overruled<\/strong>.”<\/em><\/p>\n

READ:\u00a0Department of Justice to investigate Planned Parenthood<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Barr was asked a second time if he believed Roe v. Wade<\/em> should be overruled and stated<\/a>:<\/p>\n

I believe that Roe v. Wade should be overruled. I think that the basic issue is whether or not abortion should be something that is decided by society – by the people – the extent to which it is permitted the extent to which it is regulated…. [T]hose are legitimate issues for state legislatures to deal with and that’s where the decision-making authority should be. <\/em><\/p>\n

… [I]n my view, took it away from the states and found an absolute right in the Constitution… and I don’t think that opinion was the right opinion. It’s the law of the land and until it’s overruled it remains the law of the land.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

According to Fox News,<\/a>“His answer reportedly surprised then-Sen. Joe Biden, who said Barr should be \u201ccomplimented\u201d for his \u201ccandid answer,\u201d even though the eventual U.S. vice president did not agree.”<\/p>\n