{"id":185028,"date":"2018-07-05T12:20:27","date_gmt":"2018-07-05T17:20:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/news\/?p=185028"},"modified":"2018-07-05T14:01:29","modified_gmt":"2018-07-05T19:01:29","slug":"roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/","title":{"rendered":"3 reasons why Roe v. Wade will fall, despite past Supreme Court decisions"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

Stare decisis<\/em> — a Latin phrase which means “stand decided” in English — is a focal point of current discussions on\u00a0Roe v. Wade<\/em><\/a>. The Hill<\/a> calls it “the buzzword at center of Supreme Court clash.” Stare decisis is the basis for what many Americans know as court precedent. Generally, when the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on a case — even if it did so decades ago — the precedent will be followed by lower courts and even the highest court itself. Stare decisis means the Court has spoken. The issue will “stand decided.” However…<\/p>\n

1. To “stand decided” doesn’t mean it can’t be — or hasn’t been — reversed.<\/strong><\/p>\n

It is a false impression to believe that, because of the doctrine of stare decisis, the U.S. Supreme Court rarely overturns its own decisions<\/a>. In my senior seminar paper in law school, I wrote how the doctrine should be evaluated:<\/p>\n

The doctrine of stare decisis, although compelling, is not completely inflexible. In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court has most often overturned its own decisions in constitutional cases.\u00a0Justice Brandeis wrote<\/a>, \u201cStare decisis is usually the wise policy… But in cases involving the Federal Constitution\u2026 this Court has often overruled its earlier decisions…. This is strikingly true of cases under the due process clause.\u201d<\/p>\n

In its history [as of 2009], the U.S Supreme Court has expressly reversed itself in 152 decisions, in whole or in part…\u00a0The Court explained<\/a>, \u201c[W]hen convinced of former error, this Court has never felt constrained to follow precedent. In constitutional questions, where correction depends upon amendment, and not upon legislative action, this Court throughout its history has freely exercised its power to reexamine the basis of its constitutional decisions.<\/em>\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Of course, those who opine, theorize, and write of stare decisis right now have a single case on their minds: Roe v. Wade<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Will a remodeled Supreme Court see\u00a0Roe<\/em> as settled precedent or will it see an ill-conceived ruling that is ripe for overturning? Many challenges to\u00a0Roe<\/em> could arise out of the Fourteenth Amendment<\/a>, and that is one of the Amendments on which the Court most commonly overturns itself.\u00a0This is particularly interesting because of the history of the Fourteenth Amendment<\/a>.<\/p>\n

2. The Fourteenth Amendment’s original intent was to include all human beings.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Amendment is known for its chief application: giving citizenship and equal rights under the law to former slaves and African Americans. However, the reasoning behind the Amendment went much deeper.<\/p>\n

\"\"

Public domain<\/p><\/div>\n

In 1868, former slaves were targeted by many in American society as “less than” persons. And, after the Civil War, the U.S. Congress knew there was a need to establish the basic and equal rights of all human beings as persons in our national foundational document. But the sponsors of the Fourteenth Amendment did not only speak of African Americans. They spoke, quite literally, of\u00a0all human beings<\/em> and of those who would be discriminated against in the future.<\/p>\n

As Harvard graduate Josh Craddock wrote for the\u00a0“Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy<\/a>“:<\/p>\n

Senator Jacob Howard, who sponsored the [Fourteenth] Amendment in the Senate, declared the Amendment\u2019s purpose to \u201cdisable a state from depriving not merely a citizen of the United States, but any person, whoever he may be, of life, liberty and property without due process.\u201d Even the lowest and \u201cmost despised of the [human] race\u201d were guaranteed equal protection. Representative Thaddeus Stevens called the Amendment \u201ca superstructure of perfect equality of every human being before the law; of impartial protection to everyone in whose breast God had placed an immortal soul\u201d [\u2026] The primary Framer of the Fourteenth Amendment, Representative John Bingham, intended it to ensure that \u201cno state in the Union should deny to any human being . . . the equal protection of the laws.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Representative Bingham\u00a0further explained<\/a> that the Fourteenth Amendment was intended to be “universal” in its application and that it would forever include “any human being<\/strong>.”<\/p>\n

This is one reason the U.S. Supreme Court has been so willing to overturn its own precedent and combat stare decisis where the Fourteenth Amendment is concerned.<\/p>\n

3. The Supreme Court has corrected past instances of discrimination.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Both constitutional originalists and constitutional progressivists can agree that the Court is not immune from discrimination. One need only look to\u00a0Dred Scott\u00a0<\/em>(which was never directly overturned by the Court) or\u00a0Plessy v. Ferguson\u00a0<\/em>to see that Supreme Court precedent has violated basic human rights — those rights the Fourteenth Amendment was designed to safeguard.<\/p>\n

When, often decades later, the Court sees its own discrimination in the light of modern facts, modern science, and an appropriate argument for equal rights, it rejects stare decisis in the name of original intent. The Fourteenth Amendment has always been intended to be a bridge between the vulnerable members of society and the rights guaranteed to them merely by virtue of being human. When an arm of government breaks down that bridge, it is the job of the U.S. Supreme Court to build it up again.<\/p>\n

Because the justices of the Supreme Court know this, stare decisis is not what will control when\u00a0Roe v. Wade<\/em> is revisited. Instead, the original intent of the Fourteenth Amendment will rule the day.<\/p>\n

READ: The final frontier of the civil rights movement<\/em><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Stare decisis — a Latin phrase which means “stand decided” in English — is a focal point of current discussions on\u00a0Roe v. Wade. The Hill calls it “the buzzword at center of Supreme Court clash.” Stare decisis is the basis for what many Americans know as court precedent. Generally, when the U.S. Supreme Court has […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":41552,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[15,4,9459],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n3 reasons why Roe v. Wade will fall, despite past Supreme Court decisions<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Dred Scott and\u00a0Plessy v. Ferguson\u00a0show that Supreme Court precedent has violated basic human rights, which the 14th Amendment was designed to protect.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"3 reasons why Roe v. Wade will fall, despite past Supreme Court decisions\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Dred Scott and\u00a0Plessy v. Ferguson\u00a0show that Supreme Court precedent has violated basic human rights, which the 14th Amendment was designed to protect.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-07-05T17:20:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-05T19:01:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/Abortion-Slave-e1530811285206.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1191\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1305\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kristi Burton Brown\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kristi Burton Brown\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kristi Burton Brown\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/e46f5170246392465c488379339ff5bf\"},\"headline\":\"3 reasons why Roe v. Wade will fall, despite past Supreme Court decisions\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-05T17:20:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-05T19:01:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/\"},\"wordCount\":898,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Analysis\",\"Issues\",\"Top Story on Homepage\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/\",\"name\":\"3 reasons why Roe v. Wade will fall, despite past Supreme Court decisions\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-05T17:20:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-05T19:01:29+00:00\",\"description\":\"Dred Scott and\u00a0Plessy v. Ferguson\u00a0show that Supreme Court precedent has violated basic human rights, which the 14th Amendment was designed to protect.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"3 reasons why Roe v. Wade will fall, despite past Supreme Court decisions\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/e46f5170246392465c488379339ff5bf\",\"name\":\"Kristi Burton Brown\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4d9cc9ce491f1d270197d16f88164aec?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4d9cc9ce491f1d270197d16f88164aec?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kristi Burton Brown\"},\"description\":\"Kristi Burton Brown is an evangelical pro-life attorney who has volunteered for Life Legal Defense Foundation and as an allied attorney for Alliance Defending Freedom. She is the managing editor of Live Action News, an op-ed contributor to the Christian Post, and an Associate Scholar for the Charlotte Lozier Institute. Her first book, Do Justice, is scheduled for publication in the Fall of 2017. She also has her own blog at: www.thelostgenerations.wordpress.com Follow @KBurtonBrown\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/kristi-burton-brown\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"3 reasons why Roe v. Wade will fall, despite past Supreme Court decisions","description":"Dred Scott and\u00a0Plessy v. Ferguson\u00a0show that Supreme Court precedent has violated basic human rights, which the 14th Amendment was designed to protect.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"3 reasons why Roe v. Wade will fall, despite past Supreme Court decisions","og_description":"Dred Scott and\u00a0Plessy v. Ferguson\u00a0show that Supreme Court precedent has violated basic human rights, which the 14th Amendment was designed to protect.","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2018-07-05T17:20:27+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-05T19:01:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1191,"height":1305,"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/Abortion-Slave-e1530811285206.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Kristi Burton Brown","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@liveaction","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kristi Burton Brown","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/"},"author":{"name":"Kristi Burton Brown","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/e46f5170246392465c488379339ff5bf"},"headline":"3 reasons why Roe v. Wade will fall, despite past Supreme Court decisions","datePublished":"2018-07-05T17:20:27+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-05T19:01:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/"},"wordCount":898,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Analysis","Issues","Top Story on Homepage"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/","name":"3 reasons why Roe v. Wade will fall, despite past Supreme Court decisions","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-07-05T17:20:27+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-05T19:01:29+00:00","description":"Dred Scott and\u00a0Plessy v. Ferguson\u00a0show that Supreme Court precedent has violated basic human rights, which the 14th Amendment was designed to protect.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/roe-fall-supreme-court-precedent\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"3 reasons why Roe v. Wade will fall, despite past Supreme Court decisions"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/e46f5170246392465c488379339ff5bf","name":"Kristi Burton Brown","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4d9cc9ce491f1d270197d16f88164aec?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4d9cc9ce491f1d270197d16f88164aec?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Kristi Burton Brown"},"description":"Kristi Burton Brown is an evangelical pro-life attorney who has volunteered for Life Legal Defense Foundation and as an allied attorney for Alliance Defending Freedom. She is the managing editor of Live Action News, an op-ed contributor to the Christian Post, and an Associate Scholar for the Charlotte Lozier Institute. Her first book, Do Justice, is scheduled for publication in the Fall of 2017. She also has her own blog at: www.thelostgenerations.wordpress.com Follow @KBurtonBrown","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/kristi-burton-brown\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185028"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=185028"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185028\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":185045,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185028\/revisions\/185045"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/41552"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185028"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=185028"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=185028"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}