{"id":184948,"date":"2018-07-03T17:01:06","date_gmt":"2018-07-03T22:01:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/news\/?p=184948"},"modified":"2018-07-03T17:01:25","modified_gmt":"2018-07-03T22:01:25","slug":"supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court ruling on California pregnancy centers a hopeful sign to other states"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><p>On June 26, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled\u00a05-4 <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-pregnancy-resource-centers-victory\/\">in favor of pregnancy resource centers<\/a> in <em>NIFLA v. Becerra<\/em>,<em>\u00a0<\/em>a major pro-life win, telling the state of California that it cannot force pregnancy centers to promote abortion with its draconian\u00a0&#8220;Reproductive FACT Act,&#8221; mandating government messaging to dispense information about abortion services. The Supreme Court ruled that this &#8220;likely violates the First Amendment,&#8221; stopping short of directly striking down the law, and instead, sending it back to the lower courts with the order that certain provisions of it be immediately blocked.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;California cannot co-opt the licensed facilities to deliver its message for it,&#8221; Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the majority opinion.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/rape-prostitutes-pregnancy-centers\/\">READ: <em>Where can pregnant rape victims and prostitutes get help? Pregnancy centers.<\/em><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Across the nation, pro-abortion groups have been targeting pro-life pregnancy centers. Quite simply, the fact that pregnancy centers outnumber abortion clinics <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/pro-life-pregnancy-centers-outnumber-abortion-clinics-across-country\/\">more than 5 to 1<\/a> and specifically exist in order to save women and children from abortion angers\u00a0the abortion industry because it takes away potential clients and their money.<\/p>\n<p>This major victory for pro-life pregnancy centers won&#8217;t just affect those in California.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hawaii<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In April, the Trump Administration agreed to investigate Hawaii for forcing pregnancy resource centers and pro-life doctors to advertise the availability of abortion. Hawaii SB 501 actually requires pregnancy centers to direct women to a state agency that provides abortion referrals and to have large signs and fliers that say Hawaii &#8220;provides free or low-cost access&#8221; to abortion drugs. However, <a href=\"http:\/\/alliancedefendingfreedom.org\">Alliance Defending Freedom<\/a> Legal Counsel Elissa Graves stated that the law doesn&#8217;t allow Hawaii to force pro-life doctors to advertise abortion because &#8220;states that require pro-life doctors and staff to act contrary to their conscience don&#8217;t qualify for federal funds.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Illinois<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A\u00a0similar law in Illinois requires medical providers to inform patients about all medical options including abortion, even if it goes against the religious beliefs or moral values of the doctor or medical staff. The law has been blocked temporarily and those fighting the law say they are encouraged by the Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s completely viewpoint discriminatory,&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/news\/ct-met-abortion-ruling-pregnancy-centers-20180627-story.html\">said Thomas Olp<\/a>, Thomas More Society attorney representing Hope Life Center in Illinois. &#8220;It&#8217;s attacking someone who has the conscientious objection to abortion.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court ruling, he added, &#8220;confirms our position in Illinois.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Connecticut<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courant.com\/breaking-news\/hc-pol-hartford-ordinance-pregnancy-centers-20180626-story.html\">Hartford, Connecticut<\/a>, an ordinance which looked to mandate that pregnancy resource centers advertise the availability of free and low-cost abortions has been suspended due to the Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling in <em>NIFLA v. Becerra<\/em>. It was set to go into effect on July 1, 2018. Pro-life groups in the state celebrated; however, pro-abortion groups vowed to push forward with their agenda.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The Hartford Court of Common Council and those who are supportive of this ordinance will continue to be supportive, myself included,&#8221; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wtnh.com\/news\/politics\/supreme-court-decision-halts-hartford-ordinance\/1268546612\">said <\/a>Counsel Minority Leader Widaliz Bermudez.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, Connecticut Governor <a href=\"https:\/\/portal.ct.gov\/Office-of-the-Governor\/Press-Room\/Press-Releases\/2018\/06-2018\/Gov-Malloy-Calls-for-Legislation-to-Ensure-Women-Receive-Accurate-Information-on-Medical-Options\">Dannel P. Malloy<\/a> is continuing with the anti-pregnancy center agenda, pushing the Connecticut General Assembly to adopt legislation in response to the Supreme Court ruling in order to require pregnancy centers to tell women how to access abortion.<\/p>\n<p>Prior to the Supreme Court ruling, similar laws in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.adfmedia.org\/News\/PRDetail\/5186\">Texas<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.adfmedia.org\/News\/PRDetail\/9272\">Maryland<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.adfmedia.org\/News\/PRDetail\/4980\">New York<\/a> had already been struck down.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On June 26, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled\u00a05-4 in favor of pregnancy resource centers in NIFLA v. Becerra,\u00a0a major pro-life win, telling the state of California that it cannot force pregnancy centers to promote abortion with its draconian\u00a0&#8220;Reproductive FACT Act,&#8221; mandating government messaging to dispense information about abortion services. The Supreme [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":62,"featured_media":85743,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[3473],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Supreme Court ruling on California pregnancy centers a hopeful sign to other states<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The major victory for pro-life pregnancy centers won&#039;t just affect those in California. It could have far reaching effects in IL, CT, and HI, and more.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court ruling on California pregnancy centers a hopeful sign to other states\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The major victory for pro-life pregnancy centers won&#039;t just affect those in California. It could have far reaching effects in IL, CT, and HI, and more.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-07-03T22:01:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-03T22:01:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme-court-672.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"672\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"372\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Nancy Flanders\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Nancy Flanders\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Nancy Flanders\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef\"},\"headline\":\"Supreme Court ruling on California pregnancy centers a hopeful sign to other states\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-03T22:01:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-03T22:01:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/\"},\"wordCount\":540,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Newsbreak\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court ruling on California pregnancy centers a hopeful sign to other states\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-03T22:01:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-03T22:01:25+00:00\",\"description\":\"The major victory for pro-life pregnancy centers won't just affect those in California. It could have far reaching effects in IL, CT, and HI, and more.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court ruling on California pregnancy centers a hopeful sign to other states\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef\",\"name\":\"Nancy Flanders\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Nancy Flanders\"},\"description\":\"Nancy Flanders is Associate Editor for Live Action News. She has 25 years of experience writing and editing. For more than a decade, she has focused her work on pro-life issues through human interest stories and political issues regarding abortion and physician-assisted death as well as research articles and op-eds dismantling the lies of the pro-abortion, pro-death agenda. Her work has appeared in Catholic Digest, Pregnancy Help News, and a variety of other publications.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/nancy\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court ruling on California pregnancy centers a hopeful sign to other states","description":"The major victory for pro-life pregnancy centers won't just affect those in California. It could have far reaching effects in IL, CT, and HI, and more.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court ruling on California pregnancy centers a hopeful sign to other states","og_description":"The major victory for pro-life pregnancy centers won't just affect those in California. It could have far reaching effects in IL, CT, and HI, and more.","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2018-07-03T22:01:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-03T22:01:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":672,"height":372,"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme-court-672.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Nancy Flanders","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@liveaction","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Nancy Flanders","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/"},"author":{"name":"Nancy Flanders","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef"},"headline":"Supreme Court ruling on California pregnancy centers a hopeful sign to other states","datePublished":"2018-07-03T22:01:06+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-03T22:01:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/"},"wordCount":540,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Newsbreak"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/","name":"Supreme Court ruling on California pregnancy centers a hopeful sign to other states","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-07-03T22:01:06+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-03T22:01:25+00:00","description":"The major victory for pro-life pregnancy centers won't just affect those in California. It could have far reaching effects in IL, CT, and HI, and more.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/supreme-court-pregnancy-centers-states\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court ruling on California pregnancy centers a hopeful sign to other states"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef","name":"Nancy Flanders","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Nancy Flanders"},"description":"Nancy Flanders is Associate Editor for Live Action News. She has 25 years of experience writing and editing. For more than a decade, she has focused her work on pro-life issues through human interest stories and political issues regarding abortion and physician-assisted death as well as research articles and op-eds dismantling the lies of the pro-abortion, pro-death agenda. Her work has appeared in Catholic Digest, Pregnancy Help News, and a variety of other publications.","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/nancy\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184948"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/62"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=184948"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184948\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":184974,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184948\/revisions\/184974"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/85743"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=184948"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=184948"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=184948"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}