{"id":17675,"date":"2012-06-14T02:44:26","date_gmt":"2012-06-14T06:44:26","guid":{"rendered":"\/news\/?p=17675"},"modified":"2013-04-03T21:50:02","modified_gmt":"2013-04-04T01:50:02","slug":"canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Canadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 2)"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

Part one<\/a> of this two-piece series looked into the pro-abortion arguments against the Steve Woodworth’s motion to change when a person is defined as a human being and allow unborn children to receive personhood status. Part one specifically dealt with three of\u00a0 Joyce Arthur (executive director, Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada)’s counter-points. Each was weak. The final four are just as weak, but they also work to show the true colors of the pro-abortion agenda.<\/p>\n

Counter-argument #5<\/p>\n

According to Arthur, the 400-year-old Canadian definition of human being \u201caccords very well with our modern human rights framework in which women have equality under the law.\u201d This is the Criminal Code that Woodworth is talking about, which states that we are not human beings until we exit the birth canal. But we know a lot more about fetal development today than we did 400 or even 50 years ago. And let\u2019s not forget that African-Americans were once not considered human beings. Just because a law has been in place for hundreds of years does not mean it should still be in place. Any law claiming that unborn children aren\u2019t humans is completely outdated based on our current understanding of human development thanks to advances in science and technology.<\/p>\n

Counter-argument #6<\/p>\n

Arthur argues that late-term abortions must remain legal under certain circumstances to help women who \u201cdesperately\u201d need abortions. The example she uses is an unborn child with a fetal abnormality. She feels that any mother who faces this tragedy should be allowed to end the child\u2019s life. This is, of course, discrimination at its prime. It\u2019s heartbreaking to know that a woman with such influence as Arthur has would support the flat-out murder of children who are beyond that magic light switch day of viability. Children who are diagnosed with disabilities or conditions deemed \u201cincompatible with life\u201d don\u2019t deserve death by the hands of their parents. They deserve to die with love and respect when their time comes naturally. Killing them inside the safety of their mothers’ wombs is not a way to help women deal with such tragedy.<\/p>\n

Counter-argument #7<\/p>\n

Arthur claims that a fetus is not a human being because of the fact that he lives inside his mother and depends on her. She writes:<\/p>\n

[The fetus] does not possess key aspects of personhood, such as the ability to experience human emotions, interact with others, or exercise constitutional rights. Personhood is a socially and legally constructed concept, and it is bestowed upon birth for very practical and obvious reasons.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

However, ethicists<\/a> recently announced support of infanticide for the same reasons. They claim that unborn children and newborn children are identical, and therefore \u201cafter-birth abortion\u201d should be legal, allowing parents to \u201cterminate\u201d an already born child because the child is discovered to have a disability, or just because they have decided they aren\u2019t ready to be parents. Besides that, Arthur is way off-base to make the statement that unborn children don\u2019t experience human emotions or interact with others. Twins bond<\/a> in the womb. And unborn children are affected<\/a> by their mothers’ emotions, even forming their own thoughts during their time in the womb. Plus, the only unborn children who don\u2019t exercise constitutional rights are the ones who lose their right to life through abortion.<\/p>\n

Arthur goes on:<\/p>\n

Regardless of the biological or medical status of the fetus, women need and have abortions anyway […] Women do not decide to have an abortion because they think the fetus is a \u201cclump of tissue\u201d or even because it\u2019s their \u201cright to choose.\u201d They have abortions because they\u2019re not ready to support a child right now or because they don\u2019t want to have a baby. They have abortions because their partner is abusive or because they\u2019re living in poverty. And they seek abortions regardless of legal restrictions or other barriers. Pregnant women know very well what is growing inside them, which is why they try to abort an unwanted pregnancy as early as possible, to stop the development of a baby they feel unable to care for. Such decisions are responsible and well thought out, and have nothing to do with a disregard for fetal life \u2013 on the contrary, they demonstrate respect for a child\u2019s right to be wanted and well provided for.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

All this statement says about women who have abortions is that they act out of fear and that no one actually takes the steps to help them. A woman who has an abortion because she lacks financial stability or because her partner is abusive deserves more than the murder of her unborn child. She deserves serious help out of her situation. Any abortionist who provides that abortion is doing wrong by this woman, only helping to deepen her pain and anguish.<\/p>\n

Further, Arthur\u2019s argument that women know that their child is not a clump of tissue only makes the abortion industry look like a collection of vultures that care more about the money they stand to gain from abortions than the women in their care who need actual help. Stating that the abortion is done out of respect to the child so that she isn\u2019t born unwanted only shows how cruel the abortion industry is. It isn\u2019t the unplanned child who is the problem, but rather the person who has labeled her \u201cunwanted.\u201d<\/p>\n

Counter-argument #8<\/p>\n

Finally, Arthur writes that the entire pro-life movement is based on the \u201cassumption\u201d that unborn babies are humans. She claims that the question of whether or not unborn children are human will never be answered because we all have our own views on the matter. Yet, plenty of people held the view that African-Americans weren\u2019t human and that women didn\u2019t deserve equal rights to men, but that didn\u2019t make these positions right or legally acceptable. Still, Arthur argues that whether or not the baby is human doesn\u2019t really matter. She says:<\/p>\n

Woodworth also continually uses the word \u201cchild\u201d to describe a fetus, which is just another \u201cbegging the question\u201d ploy to try and lead people to equate fetuses with children and therefore accept that they should have rights. Fetus is the correct medical term and it means \u201cthe unborn young from the end of the eighth week after conception to the moment of birth<\/em>.\u201d The term \u201cchild\u201d means \u201ca person of either sex between the time of birth and adolescence<\/em>.\u201d Although \u201cchild\u201d is often used informally to refer to fetuses, this is a colloquial usage that has no legitimate place in modern law or medicine \u2013 including in Woodworth\u2019s motion.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Such a reach of an argument. Aren\u2019t the elderly also adults? Aren\u2019t toddlers also children? Each stage of life has a multitude of titles, but they each have one in common \u2013 human beings. Therefore, fetus, newborn, infant, toddler, child, teenager, young adult, adult, senior citizen are all equal in the fact that they are each persons in a different life stage. Arthur is right on one thing: “fetus” means “young one.” The question is \u2013 what does \u201cone\u201d stand for? Can we substitute the words \u201cyoung human\u201d when referring to human fetuses? Or are Canada, the U.S., and the rest of the world going to continue pretending that fetuses are nonentities that magically turn human at birth?<\/p>\n

If you are Canadian, please contact your respective members of Parliament and ask for their support of M-312.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A look at more bizarre pro-choice arguments in the latest personhood debate in Canada.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":62,"featured_media":15900,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nCanadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 2) - Live Action News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Canadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 2) - Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A look at more bizarre pro-choice arguments in the latest personhood debate in Canada.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-06-14T06:44:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2013-04-04T01:50:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/2123523275_983f039f2b_n.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"320\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"213\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Nancy Flanders\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Nancy Flanders\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Nancy Flanders\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef\"},\"headline\":\"Canadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 2)\",\"datePublished\":\"2012-06-14T06:44:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-04-04T01:50:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/\"},\"wordCount\":1251,\"commentCount\":1,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Opinion\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/\",\"name\":\"Canadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 2) - Live Action News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-06-14T06:44:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-04-04T01:50:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Canadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 2)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef\",\"name\":\"Nancy Flanders\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Nancy Flanders\"},\"description\":\"Nancy Flanders is Associate Editor for Live Action News. She has 25 years of experience writing and editing. For more than a decade, she has focused her work on pro-life issues through human interest stories and political issues regarding abortion and physician-assisted death as well as research articles and op-eds dismantling the lies of the pro-abortion, pro-death agenda. Her work has appeared in Catholic Digest, Pregnancy Help News, and a variety of other publications.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/nancy\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Canadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 2) - Live Action News","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Canadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 2) - Live Action News","og_description":"A look at more bizarre pro-choice arguments in the latest personhood debate in Canada.","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2012-06-14T06:44:26+00:00","article_modified_time":"2013-04-04T01:50:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":"320","height":"213","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/2123523275_983f039f2b_n.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Nancy Flanders","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@liveaction","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Nancy Flanders","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/"},"author":{"name":"Nancy Flanders","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef"},"headline":"Canadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 2)","datePublished":"2012-06-14T06:44:26+00:00","dateModified":"2013-04-04T01:50:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/"},"wordCount":1251,"commentCount":1,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Opinion"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/","name":"Canadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 2) - Live Action News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-06-14T06:44:26+00:00","dateModified":"2013-04-04T01:50:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Canadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 2)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef","name":"Nancy Flanders","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Nancy Flanders"},"description":"Nancy Flanders is Associate Editor for Live Action News. She has 25 years of experience writing and editing. For more than a decade, she has focused her work on pro-life issues through human interest stories and political issues regarding abortion and physician-assisted death as well as research articles and op-eds dismantling the lies of the pro-abortion, pro-death agenda. Her work has appeared in Catholic Digest, Pregnancy Help News, and a variety of other publications.","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/nancy\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17675"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/62"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17675"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17675\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15900"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17675"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17675"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17675"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}