{"id":17673,"date":"2012-06-12T23:50:11","date_gmt":"2012-06-13T03:50:11","guid":{"rendered":"\/news\/?p=17673"},"modified":"2013-04-03T21:51:56","modified_gmt":"2013-04-04T01:51:56","slug":"canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/","title":{"rendered":"Canadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 1)"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

On June 13, the Canadian Parliament is set to debate<\/a> Conservative MP Steve Woodworth\u2019s motion (M-312) regarding whether or not unborn babies are human beings. The goal of M-312 is to re-examine section 223 of the Criminal Code, which states that \u201c[a] child becomes a human being within the meaning of this Act when it has completely proceeded, in a living state, from the body of its mother, whether or not (a)\u00a0it has breathed; (b)\u00a0it has an independent circulation; or (c)\u00a0the navel string is severed.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n

Not everyone is excited about the possibly of unborn Canadians being given the \u201cpersonhood\u201d status. Joyce Arthur, executive director of the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada, has created a list<\/a> of weak, transparent counter-arguments against M-312, in hopes of dismantling Woodworth\u2019s line of reasoning. Arthur\u2019s eight arguments attack M-312, calling it \u201ca waste of time and taxpayer money\u201d and claiming that \u201cthere are zero problems with the existing law.\u201d<\/p>\n

Counter-argument #1<\/p>\n

Arthur claims that because the Supreme Court has decided on more than one occasion that an unborn child must be born alive before being allowed to enjoy rights, there\u2019s no sense is raising a debate about it. She writes:<\/p>\n

Although Parliament could theoretically revisit the issue and pass laws to restrict abortion or give rights to fetuses, it\u2019s highly unlikely that such laws would withstand a constitutional challenge in the courts [\u2026] because laws that apply only to women and not men are automatically discriminatory.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

If laws that make abortion illegal are discriminatory because they can\u2019t be applied to men, then how are laws that keep abortion legal not discriminatory also? They can\u2019t be applied to men, either, and as we\u2019ve seen, fathers have zero rights<\/a> when it comes to abortion. Any law that has to do with pregnancy for any reason would be discriminatory. But since the laws that currently keep abortion legal are biased only against men and the unborn babies, abortion providers are not concerned. Making abortion illegal, however, would mean trouble for the abortion industry, so Arthur is pulling out the discrimination card in hopes of winning support.<\/p>\n

Counter-argument #2<\/p>\n

Arthur argues that giving rights to unborn humans would lead to the arrests and prosecutions of pregnant women who suffer complications, miscarriages, or stillbirths. Arthur argues:<\/p>\n

Anti-choice members of law enforcement or the judiciary could exploit child welfare laws to subject women to criminal prosecution for harming or \u201cmurdering\u201d their fetus when something goes wrong in a wanted pregnancy. It could even open the door to women being investigated after they suffer a miscarriage or stillbirth, or any other serious complication that endangers the fetus. As in the U.S., the women targeted would mostly be racialized and low-income women.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In many U.S. states, fetal homicide laws protect unborn children from harm by making it illegal to hurt or kill an unborn child unless the mother seeks out an abortion. Women are currently being tried for murder for allegedly consuming rat poison<\/a> and cocaine<\/a> during pregnancy, resulting in the death of their babies. Both women were well into the third trimester. Just as an investigation into the parents would and should occur concerning the death of a born child, one should occur when an unborn child dies unexpectedly. Only those women who intentionally did anything to harm their unborn children would face any charges, and rightly so.<\/p>\n

Counter-argument #3<\/p>\n

According to Arthur, fetuses cannot be given legal rights for the simple fact that they live inside another person\u2019s body. She has concluded that giving rights to fetuses would result in a \u201cserious clash of rights\u201d and that if fetuses had \u201clegal personhood, pregnant women would lose theirs.\u201d<\/p>\n

Two people can exist in the same body and both have rights. It happens every day. Millions of women are pregnant right now, and they don\u2019t feel that their rights are being violated in anyway. Plus, conjoined twins are recognized legally as two separate and equal persons, despite the fact that they often share many body parts and could die<\/a> upon separation, like Abby and Brittany Hensel<\/a>. A mother and unborn child, however, have two completely different bodies, and yet, by current law, one is viewed as a non-person able to be put to death at the other one\u2019s will.<\/p>\n

Counter-argument #4<\/p>\n

Arthur falls back on the complete nonsense argument that any and every anti-abortion movement or motion is an attempt by men to control women. She, and most abortion advocates, repeatedly make the claim that anyone who is against abortion is against women. Arthur writes the following about M-312:<\/p>\n

[T]he motion perpetuates the patriarchal need to control women and reproduction by seeking to relegate women to a childbearing role. The vision of the anti-abortion movement is to ban both birth control and abortion and force women into repeated unwanted childbearing, with no regard for the substantial health and social problems this would pose to women, children, and society at large. The patriarchal purpose behind this vision is to keep women busy with a brood of children so they will have no time to gain influence in the political arena, leaving power securely in the hands of men.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

According to Arthur, pro-lifers (including women) think women should be only childbearing slaves to men. But it\u2019s Arthur who believes that mothers are too bogged down with the duties of parenthood to work, vote, run for office, or do anything of significance besides take a shower once a week. She\u2019s the one who claims that by allowing a child to be born rather than die through abortion, anti-abortion activists and lawmakers are turning women into brainless, spit-up-covered weaklings. Is that what mothers are to Arthur and her pro-abortion cohorts? Pro-lifers, on the other hand, believe that women can do it all. Just ask Feminists for Life<\/a>. Arthur makes it clear that while pro-lifers believe that childbearing is a gift that women should celebrate in conjunction with the rest of their full and extraordinary lives, it is the abortionists who are trying to convince women that children will hold them back and turn them into worthless zombies.<\/p>\n

Part two of this series will argue against Arthur’s final four outlandish points against the unborn. If you are Canadian, please contact your respective members of Parliament and ask for their support of M-312.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Examining a series of ridiculous arguments against personhood for the unborn.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":62,"featured_media":12853,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nCanadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 1) - Live Action News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Canadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 1) - Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Examining a series of ridiculous arguments against personhood for the unborn.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-06-13T03:50:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2013-04-04T01:51:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/03\/human-fetus.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"386\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Nancy Flanders\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Nancy Flanders\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Nancy Flanders\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef\"},\"headline\":\"Canadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 1)\",\"datePublished\":\"2012-06-13T03:50:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-04-04T01:51:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/\"},\"wordCount\":1072,\"commentCount\":8,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Opinion\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/\",\"name\":\"Canadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 1) - Live Action News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-06-13T03:50:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-04-04T01:51:56+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Canadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 1)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef\",\"name\":\"Nancy Flanders\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Nancy Flanders\"},\"description\":\"Nancy Flanders is Associate Editor for Live Action News. She has 25 years of experience writing and editing. For more than a decade, she has focused her work on pro-life issues through human interest stories and political issues regarding abortion and physician-assisted death as well as research articles and op-eds dismantling the lies of the pro-abortion, pro-death agenda. Her work has appeared in Catholic Digest, Pregnancy Help News, and a variety of other publications.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/nancy\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Canadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 1) - Live Action News","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Canadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 1) - Live Action News","og_description":"Examining a series of ridiculous arguments against personhood for the unborn.","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2012-06-13T03:50:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2013-04-04T01:51:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":"600","height":"386","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/03\/human-fetus.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Nancy Flanders","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@liveaction","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Nancy Flanders","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/"},"author":{"name":"Nancy Flanders","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef"},"headline":"Canadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 1)","datePublished":"2012-06-13T03:50:11+00:00","dateModified":"2013-04-04T01:51:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/"},"wordCount":1072,"commentCount":8,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Opinion"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/","name":"Canadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 1) - Live Action News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-06-13T03:50:11+00:00","dateModified":"2013-04-04T01:51:56+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/canadian-parliament-set-to-debate-the-human-status-of-unborn-children-for-the-third-time-part-1\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Canadian Parliament set to debate the human status of unborn children for the third time (part 1)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, & Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d61ca3dd1aacf12635bdf71d75c328ef","name":"Nancy Flanders","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dee54060bdc22fdfbf36d946b3026cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Nancy Flanders"},"description":"Nancy Flanders is Associate Editor for Live Action News. She has 25 years of experience writing and editing. For more than a decade, she has focused her work on pro-life issues through human interest stories and political issues regarding abortion and physician-assisted death as well as research articles and op-eds dismantling the lies of the pro-abortion, pro-death agenda. Her work has appeared in Catholic Digest, Pregnancy Help News, and a variety of other publications.","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/nancy\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17673"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/62"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17673"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17673\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12853"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17673"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17673"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17673"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}