{"id":174713,"date":"2017-11-14T15:05:18","date_gmt":"2017-11-14T20:05:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/news\/?p=174713"},"modified":"2017-11-14T15:05:18","modified_gmt":"2017-11-14T20:05:18","slug":"nyt-writer-calls-facebook-censor-pro-life-message","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/nyt-writer-calls-facebook-censor-pro-life-message\/","title":{"rendered":"New York Times writer calls for Facebook to censor pro-life message"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

New York Times (NYT) writer\u00a0Rossalyn Warren<\/a>\u00a0is calling for Facebook to censor pro-life news sites like Live Action News and Life News. In an opinion\u00a0piece<\/a> entitled, “Facebook Is Ignoring Anti-Abortion Fake News,” Warren failed to publish any credible research which would rebut a single story published by these two entities, but still thinks they need to be censored, based on her own personal bias.<\/p>\n

The NYT describes<\/a> Warren as a “journalist” but in this case, it is obvious that her pro-abortion<\/a> bias has overruled everything else.\u00a0Warren writes, “So far,\u00a0Facebook and the public have focused almost solely on politics and Russian interference in the United States election. What they haven’t addressed is the vast amount of misinformation and evidenced stories about reproductive rights, science and health.”<\/p>\n

To clarify, what Warren means by “reproductive rights” is abortion<\/em>; what she means by “science and health” is not the truth about when life begins, when a preborn baby’s heartbeat can be detected, or any actual science about the development of the baby or the harm effects of abortion on women. No, that is conveniently ignored by pro-abortion apologists like Warren. Apparently, in an opinion piece, one doesn’t have to any present facts.<\/p>\n

\"\"

Rossalyn Warren wants to censor pro-life news (image: Twitter)<\/p><\/div>\n

The only reasoning Warren offers for censoring pro-life outlets is the fact that Live Action recently ran a series of articles<\/a> on the documentary film Hush<\/a><\/em>, made by pro-choice filmmaker<\/a>\u00a0Punam Kumar Gill, who\u00a0refused to blindly believe what she was told about the harmful effects of abortion; instead, the film documents her investigation of the claims about a link between abortion and breast cancer.\u00a0Warren failed to dispute in any way the film’s research, which was heavily sourced.<\/p>\n

To Warren, Gill’s research is “fake news” — yet Warren offers absolutely no proof whatsoever for her conclusion. Yet, ironically, in her piece, Warren criticizes a 2016\u00a0blog story<\/a>\u00a0on late-term abortions for “failing to cite any sources or studies.”<\/p>\n