{"id":174420,"date":"2017-11-08T13:24:52","date_gmt":"2017-11-08T18:24:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liveaction.org\/news\/?p=174420"},"modified":"2017-11-08T10:37:42","modified_gmt":"2017-11-08T15:37:42","slug":"abortionists-express-anger-repeat-abortions-self-destructive-behavior","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/abortionists-express-anger-repeat-abortions-self-destructive-behavior\/","title":{"rendered":"Abortionists express anger at repeat abortions: ‘This is self-destructive behavior’"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

A common pro-choice argument is that abortion is acceptable because a fetus\/preborn baby is merely “potential life,” not a person. Therefore, killing him or her (yes, sex is determined at conception) is not murder, and is different than killing an older child or an adult. The pro-choice movement’s common claims — like the one that abortion is the same as any other surgical procedure, similar to removing an appendix —\u00a0dehumanize preborn babies, who science calls new human beings<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Yet those who commit abortions and actually see the torn-apart bodies of aborted babies realize abortion is not a simple operation that removes tissue. They realize that abortion kills human beings.\u00a0Some abortionists have plainly\u00a0admitted<\/a>\u00a0that what they do is killing. And some abortion workers express frustration toward women who have repeat abortions.\"www.AbortionProcedures.com<\/a><\/p>\n

If abortion was just the removal of cells or tissue, there would be no moral problem, guilt, or anger associated with it. No one gets angry at a person for having multiple wisdom teeth extracted. Yet abortion workers often feel resentful and angry when women come in for repeat abortions.<\/p>\n

“I did feel repulsion…”<\/strong><\/p>\n

SA Davies, a British nurse who assists with abortions, says:<\/p>\n

I admit that although I did feel repulsion for certain characters who presented themselves before doctors requesting abortions, I soon realized that judgement is an extremely delicate business. Many of the \u201cyoung girls\u201d who came for termination on a first-time basis were frightened and very repentant and quite obviously regretted everything related to the experience of carrying a child. On the other hand, young girls appearing for second abortions, some undoubtedly had little or no responsibility in any form, let alone any sensitivity related to the life of their foetus. (1)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Sensitivity to the life of the fetus? Davies expresses her “repulsion” towards women who do not have any feelings for their preborn babies, but she helps commit abortions every day. This is cognitive dissonance — believing two contradicting things. Why should lives be valued and regarded with \u201csensitivity\u201d if they are worthless, like a wisdom tooth?<\/p>\n

“That disgusted me.”<\/strong><\/p>\n

Another abortion worker, quoted in Abby Johnson\u2019s book The Walls are Talking<\/em>, says:<\/p>\n

I would counsel the women during the sedation process before their abortions. \u2026 One woman was there for her eleventh abortion. Eleventh! That disgusted me. One 37-year-old patient was having her seventh abortion on the same day that her daughter was having her first grandbaby. Her festive mood and celebratory attitude concerning her granddaughter\u2019s birth seemed morbid and out of place in an abortion clinic. (2)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This worker (who later left the industry and became pro-life) was disturbed by the casual way women treated abortion. Her feelings indicate that abortion is not just the removal of cells, and there is nothing to be \u201cfestive\u2019 about.<\/p>\n