{"id":160857,"date":"2017-01-22T16:51:47","date_gmt":"2017-01-22T21:51:47","guid":{"rendered":"\/news\/?p=160857"},"modified":"2017-01-23T11:18:28","modified_gmt":"2017-01-23T16:18:28","slug":"congress-to-consider-permanently-banning-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-this-week","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/congress-to-consider-permanently-banning-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-this-week\/","title":{"rendered":"Congress to consider permanently banning taxpayer funding for abortion this week"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

This week, Congress will begin discussing H.R. 7<\/a>, the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2017. This bill would effectively make the Hyde Amendment permanent. A similar bill passed the House in 2015, but failed to pass the Senate.<\/p>\n

The bill would ban federal funding of abortions, as well federal funding for health benefits plans that cover abortions. It would also ban federal facilities and federal employees from providing abortions. Nothing in the bill would prevent non-federal organizations from providing funding or coverage for abortion.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

During the presidential campaign, Donald Trump vowed to end taxpayer funding of abortion<\/a> by making the Hyde Amendment permanent. The Hyde Amendment is a provisional rider that has been added to an appropriations bill every year since 1976. With this move, banning taxpayer funding for abortion would be its own, permanent, law. And while Democrats went the opposite direction — putting the overturning of Hyde into their official platform<\/a> — they were opposed by pro-life party members. Planned Parenthood has also lobbied to have Hyde overturned.<\/p>\n

The truth is, Americans favor ending\u00a0taxpayer funding for abortion, including the majority of low-income Americans. Altogether, roughly 7 out of 10 Americans do not want taxpayer dollars going towards abortion<\/a>, so this bill is clearly something that the people want.<\/p>\n

While this bill is a good step forward, it does not completely ban all<\/em> federal funding for abortion; there are exceptions in cases of rape or incest, and if the life of the mother is in danger. The problem with these exceptions is that they do not make abortion acceptable<\/a> in any way. A child who is conceived in incest did nothing wrong and does not deserve a death sentence because of her\u00a0parents’ mistakes; the answer to healing from rape is not more violence. Live Action President Lila Rose addressed this very issue in a debate on CNN with NARAL President Ilyse Hogue:<\/p>\n