{"id":157286,"date":"2016-11-23T18:20:17","date_gmt":"2016-11-23T23:20:17","guid":{"rendered":"\/news\/?p=157286"},"modified":"2016-11-23T18:13:25","modified_gmt":"2016-11-23T23:13:25","slug":"new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/","title":{"rendered":"New poll warns not to overturn Roe v. Wade. Don&#8217;t buy it."},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><p>Now that the presidential election has made overturning <em>Roe v. Wade<\/em> a <a href=\"\/news\/panicked-abortion-advocates-worry-roe-v-wades-days-numbered\/\">very real possibility in the not-too-distant future<\/a>, abortion advocates are shifting their focus to sowing discontent about the possibility, in the hopes that making a world without <em>Roe<\/em> sound outrageous and unthinkable will intimidate judges and politicians away from it.<\/p>\n<p>To that end, they\u2019ve seized upon a <a href=\"https:\/\/poll.qu.edu\/national\/release-detail?ReleaseID=2406\">new Quinnipiac University poll<\/a> supposedly showing that most of the public not only sides with abortion, but strongly wants <em>Roe<\/em> to stand. In response to the question, \u201cIn general, do you agree or disagree with the 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision that established a woman&#8217;s right to an abortion?\u201d 67% of respondents agreed and just 30% disagreed. Further:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>American voter opinions on abortion are:<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; 26 percent say it should be legal in all cases;<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; 38 percent say it should be legal in most cases;<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; 22 percent say it should be illegal in most cases;<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; 10 percent say it should be illegal in all cases.<\/p>\n<p>For Supreme Court nominees, Trump should consider only a nominee&#8217;s qualifications, 51 percent of voters say, while 40 percent say he also should consider the nominee&#8217;s opinions on issues such as abortion. Those who want a nominee&#8217;s opinions considered say 51 &#8211; 43 percent that Trump should not nominate Supreme Court justices who will vote to restrict abortion rights.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It sounds bad for the pro-life cause, but we need to keep some important caveats in mind.<\/p>\n<p>First, Quinnipiac\u2019s result on abortion itself, 64% generally for and 32% generally against, is a dramatic outlier in abortion polling, calling into question the rest of this poll\u2019s findings. <em>Two decades\u2019 <\/em>worth of polling data from Gallup, 1995 through 2015, <a href=\"http:\/\/cns7prod.s3.amazonaws.com\/attachments\/gallup-may_6-10-2015-abortion_survey.pdf\">has consistently found<\/a> that <em>at least<\/em> 54% of Americans want abortion limited to few or no circumstances. Further, Marist Institute polls commissioned by the Knights of Columbus (KoC is pro-life, but Marist is a respected independent group) in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kofc.org\/un\/en\/resources\/communications\/marist_poll_abortion_122012.pdf\">2008<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kofc.org\/un\/en\/resources\/communications\/marist-poll-abortion-restrictions2014.pdf\">2014<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kofc.org\/un\/en\/resources\/communications\/Abortion_in_America_January2015_For_Release_150121.pdf\">2015<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kofc.org\/un\/en\/resources\/communications\/abortion-america-january2016.pdf\">2016<\/a> consistently found that between 56% and 59% want to ban either all abortions or limit them to rape, incest, and life of the mother.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ArticleAd1\">\n<p><!-- \/1011927\/LAN_300_by_250_top_article --><\/p>\n<div id=\"div-gpt-ad-1473179053567-0\" class=\"ArticleAd1a\"><script>\ngoogletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1473179053567-0'); });\n<\/script><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>Second, we just had a presidential election that pollsters <a href=\"http:\/\/fivethirtyeight.com\/features\/the-polls-missed-trump-we-asked-pollsters-why\/\">got <em>epically<\/em> wrong<\/a>, so it\u2019s a bit rich that we\u2019re expected to turn around and take another poll as authoritative as if November 8, 2016, never happened.<\/p>\n<p>Besides, what\u2019s an election if not the ultimate poll, the most comprehensive referendum of the public\u2019s priorities? Donald Trump and House and Senate candidates explicitly campaigned on all of these questions. Voters knew their vote was a vote for a pro-life platform, overturning <em>Roe<\/em>, and pro-life judges\u2014and they said yes. Sure, there were any number of other issues that took precedence for voters on either side, but the fact remains that the electorate deemed Trump\u2019s abortion positions acceptable.<\/p>\n<p>Third, it is true that polls generally find the public more favorable to <em>Roe<\/em> than they are to the broader subject of abortion. But why is that? Because <em>Roe<\/em> has earned some sort of sacrosanct status akin to the Bill of Rights? Hardly.<\/p>\n<p>The <em>Roe<\/em>\u00a0that respondents embrace in polls like this isn\u2019t the real, historical <em>Roe v. Wade<\/em>, the one that <a href=\"\/news\/justice-scalias-refresher-on-constitutional-originalism\/\">not even abortion-friendly scholars can justify<\/a> because of its <a href=\"http:\/\/liveaction.org\/blog\/the-case-against-roe-v-wade-and-planned-parenthood-v-casey\/\">legal, factual, and historical bankruptcy<\/a>, the one that <a href=\"\/news\/5-things-you-didnt-know-about-roe-v-wade\/\">effectively protects abortion throughout all of pregnancy<\/a>. They\u2019re embracing a mythological version of <em>Roe<\/em> decades of media lies have conditioned them to believe in\u2014one that only protects early-term abortions or abortions for medical emergencies, one necessary to save women from <a href=\"\/news\/naral-spokeswoman-lies-about-abortion-on-complicit-msnbc\/\">dying in (also-mythical) back alleys<\/a>, and one as Americans they feel <em>compelled<\/em> to support as an outgrowth of the Constitution\u2019s <a href=\"\/news\/privacy-dumbest-argument-legal-abortion\/\">(nonexistent) right to privacy<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The media reinforcing ignorance of Roe\u2019s actual characteristics\u2014and then citing the fruits of their efforts as evidence against pro-lifers\u2014<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nrlc.org\/archive\/news\/2007\/NRL06\/PresidentColumn.html\">has been<\/a> a <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.thegospelcoalition.org\/justintaylor\/2010\/01\/22\/overturning-and-undermining-roe-v-wade-an-interview-with-clarke-forsythe\/\">known issue<\/a> for <a href=\"http:\/\/liveaction.org\/blog\/most-americans-dont-understand-effects-of-roe-v-wade\/\">years<\/a>. As David Andrusko of National Right to Life News <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalrighttolifenews.org\/news\/2015\/08\/what-five-facts-about-abortion-really-tell-us\/#.WDX5DqIrKRs\">explained in 2015<\/a>, covering a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/fact-tank\/2014\/01\/22\/5-facts-about-abortion\">Pew report<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>#1 \u201cMore than six-in-ten (63%) U.S. adults say they would not like to see the Supreme Court completely overturn Roe v. Wade, while about three-in-ten (29%) want to see the ruling overturned. These figures have remained relatively stable for more than 20 years.\u201c [To be clear, this particular statement actually references polling done in early 2013.]<\/p>\n<p>To begin with what is it that the respondent is told to comment on? \u201cIn 1973, the Roe versus Wade decision established a woman\u2019s constitutional right to an abortion, at least in the first three months of pregnancy. Would you like to see the Supreme Court completely overturn its Roe versus Wade decision, or not?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>40 years after Roe is handed down, we had a major research organization characterizing Roe\u2019s holding of virtual abortion on demand \u201cas established a woman\u2019s constitutional right to an abortion, at least in the first three months of pregnancy.\u201d Although that canard should have been laid to rest at least a decade, if not more, ago, alas, it hasn\u2019t. What would the response be if the question were asked in a fashion that represented Roe fairly?<\/p>\n<p>So, if you radically underreport what Roe (and its companion case, Doe v. Bolton) concluded, it allows Michael Dimock, director of the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, to say that it is uncommon to see so little change in attitudes on a controversial issue.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<div class=\"ArticleAd2\">\n<p><!-- \/1011927\/LAN_300_BY_250_mid_article --><\/p>\n<div id=\"div-gpt-ad-1473179101244-0\" class=\"ArticleAd2a\"><script>\ngoogletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1473179101244-0'); });\n<\/script><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>There\u2019s one final reason pro-life officeholders shouldn\u2019t fear a political backlash from overturning <em>Roe<\/em>: if and when it happens, the American people will see for themselves that the results won\u2019t include women suddenly becoming helpless in the face of medical emergencies or thrust into back alleys.<\/p>\n<p>Even better, once the public sees that the sky didn\u2019t fall, they\u2019ll start to wonder which of the Chicken Little abortion lobby\u2019s other warnings have been nothing more than fear mongering.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Now that the presidential election has made overturning Roe v. Wade a very real possibility in the not-too-distant future, abortion advocates are shifting their focus to sowing discontent about the possibility, in the hopes that making a world without Roe sound outrageous and unthinkable will intimidate judges and politicians away from it. To that end, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":54,"featured_media":26346,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>New poll warns not to overturn Roe v. Wade. Don&#039;t buy it.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Quinnipiac\u2019s result on abortion, 64% generally for and 32% generally against, is a dramatic outlier in abortion polling, calling the poll into question.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"New poll warns not to overturn Roe v. Wade. Don&#039;t buy it.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Quinnipiac\u2019s result on abortion, 64% generally for and 32% generally against, is a dramatic outlier in abortion polling, calling the poll into question.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Live Action News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-11-23T23:20:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-23T23:13:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/roe-v-wade-shirt.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"648\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"432\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Calvin Freiburger\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@liveaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Calvin Freiburger\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Calvin Freiburger\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6eb2bf94c8064b71953ba137bf413c4d\"},\"headline\":\"New poll warns not to overturn Roe v. Wade. Don&#8217;t buy it.\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-11-23T23:20:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-23T23:13:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/\"},\"wordCount\":969,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Analysis\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/\",\"name\":\"New poll warns not to overturn Roe v. Wade. Don't buy it.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-11-23T23:20:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-23T23:13:25+00:00\",\"description\":\"Quinnipiac\u2019s result on abortion, 64% generally for and 32% generally against, is a dramatic outlier in abortion polling, calling the poll into question.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"New poll warns not to overturn Roe v. Wade. Don&#8217;t buy it.\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Live Action News\",\"description\":\"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Live Action\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png\",\"width\":701,\"height\":710,\"caption\":\"Live Action\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/\",\"https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6eb2bf94c8064b71953ba137bf413c4d\",\"name\":\"Calvin Freiburger\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e27533b6967b0c47cce543ba67e2a7a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e27533b6967b0c47cce543ba67e2a7a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Calvin Freiburger\"},\"description\":\"Calvin Freiburger is a Wisconsin-based conservative writer and 2011 Hillsdale College graduate, dedicated to the principles of the American Founding\u2014individual liberty, limited government, public virtue, free markets, and strong defense\u2014though he believes no issue is more important than defending the unalienable rights of society\u2019s most vulnerable members. Calvin is an editor and administrator for TheFederalistPapers.org, and his work has appeared on NewsRealBlog.com, PatriotUpdate.com, LifeNews.com, LifeSiteNews.com, RightWisconsin.com, AmericanThinker.com, Stream.org, AmericanClarion.org, and more. Please check out his official website, ConservativeStandards.com. Follow @CalFreiburger\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/calvin-freiburger\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"New poll warns not to overturn Roe v. Wade. Don't buy it.","description":"Quinnipiac\u2019s result on abortion, 64% generally for and 32% generally against, is a dramatic outlier in abortion polling, calling the poll into question.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"New poll warns not to overturn Roe v. Wade. Don't buy it.","og_description":"Quinnipiac\u2019s result on abortion, 64% generally for and 32% generally against, is a dramatic outlier in abortion polling, calling the poll into question.","og_url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/","og_site_name":"Live Action News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","article_published_time":"2016-11-23T23:20:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-23T23:13:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":648,"height":432,"url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/roe-v-wade-shirt.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Calvin Freiburger","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@liveaction","twitter_site":"@liveaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Calvin Freiburger","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/"},"author":{"name":"Calvin Freiburger","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6eb2bf94c8064b71953ba137bf413c4d"},"headline":"New poll warns not to overturn Roe v. Wade. Don&#8217;t buy it.","datePublished":"2016-11-23T23:20:17+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-23T23:13:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/"},"wordCount":969,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Analysis"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/","name":"New poll warns not to overturn Roe v. Wade. Don't buy it.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-11-23T23:20:17+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-23T23:13:25+00:00","description":"Quinnipiac\u2019s result on abortion, 64% generally for and 32% generally against, is a dramatic outlier in abortion polling, calling the poll into question.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/new-poll-warns-not-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-dont-buy-it\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"New poll warns not to overturn Roe v. Wade. Don&#8217;t buy it."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","name":"Live Action News","description":"Covering Human Rights, Abortion, &amp; Pro-Life Issues","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#organization","name":"Live Action","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Live-Action-Logo-Black.png","width":701,"height":710,"caption":"Live Action"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/twitter.com\/liveaction","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/liveactionorg\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/LiveActionFilms\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/LiveActionFilms"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/6eb2bf94c8064b71953ba137bf413c4d","name":"Calvin Freiburger","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e27533b6967b0c47cce543ba67e2a7a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e27533b6967b0c47cce543ba67e2a7a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Calvin Freiburger"},"description":"Calvin Freiburger is a Wisconsin-based conservative writer and 2011 Hillsdale College graduate, dedicated to the principles of the American Founding\u2014individual liberty, limited government, public virtue, free markets, and strong defense\u2014though he believes no issue is more important than defending the unalienable rights of society\u2019s most vulnerable members. Calvin is an editor and administrator for TheFederalistPapers.org, and his work has appeared on NewsRealBlog.com, PatriotUpdate.com, LifeNews.com, LifeSiteNews.com, RightWisconsin.com, AmericanThinker.com, Stream.org, AmericanClarion.org, and more. Please check out his official website, ConservativeStandards.com. Follow @CalFreiburger","url":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/author\/calvin-freiburger\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157286"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/54"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=157286"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157286\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":157295,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157286\/revisions\/157295"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/26346"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=157286"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=157286"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=157286"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}