{"id":156626,"date":"2016-11-16T17:04:03","date_gmt":"2016-11-16T22:04:03","guid":{"rendered":"\/news\/?p=156626"},"modified":"2016-11-16T15:01:58","modified_gmt":"2016-11-16T20:01:58","slug":"overturning-roe-would-require-abortion-advocates-to-persuade-voters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.liveaction.org\/news\/overturning-roe-would-require-abortion-advocates-to-persuade-voters\/","title":{"rendered":"Overturning Roe would require abortion advocates to persuade voters"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

Following a big loss for the abortion industry <\/a>with the election of Republicans to the White House, House of Representatives, and Senate<\/a>, Planned Parenthood continues to\u00a0beg for donations<\/a>\u00a0using scare tactics, as it fears for<\/a>\u00a0the fate of Roe v. Wade<\/em><\/a>. The nation’s largest abortion provider is pushing the\u00a0“WE reject your hate” narrative as part of #WeWontGoBack<\/a>. This is in reference to President-Elect Donald Trump’s pro-life campaign promises, namely to nominate judges<\/a> to the U.S. Supreme Court who would be more likely to\u00a0overturn\u00a0Roe v. Wade\u00a0<\/em>and\u00a0Doe v. Bolton.<\/em><\/p>\n

With the outrage and categorization of Trump, you would think abortion was on its way to being\u00a0completely banned tomorrow.<\/p>\n

The New York Times recently claimed\u00a0that Trump had “softened” his stance on immigration, “but not on abortion.”<\/a>\u00a0The NYT\u00a0admits that Trump acknowledges that, if Roe were overturned, the abortion issue would return to the states. Trump also mentioned this in his interview with CBS’\u00a060 Minutes<\/em><\/a>, which aired Sunday. As interviewer Lesly Stahl tried to get Trump to say that overturning the decision meant\u00a0“some women won\u2019t be able to get an abortion,” the President-elect correctly asserted,\u00a0“No. It’ll go back to the states,” and added that\u00a0women will “perhaps have to go… to another state.”<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n